Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2018 4:03:22 GMT
At +Williamson's 30 year episcopal anniversary sermon, he goes into his life history admitting he was protestant through and through with complete protestant thinking going to Econe seminary. Admits too he didn't even know the difference between the traditional mass and the novus ordo mass (5:50). And went to Econe didn't know where he was regarding what mass was being said (6:30).
Later said (23:10 ) the novus ordo mass is bad then says 'practitioners' of the novus ordo mass is good. How can something be bad and good at the same time? What mush! Isn't the sacrifice objective? Either it pleases God or it doesn't regardless what man thinks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2018 11:41:17 GMT
The problem with Bishop Williamson I think is that he allows his compassion for those in the Novus Ordo have an effect on his decisions regarding Novus Ordo Mass active attendance. We must separate the two. The question that he needs to answers clearly is this:
Is active attendance at the Novus Ordo Mass an intrinsically evil act?
I say, "Yes."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2018 16:08:18 GMT
The problem with Bishop Williamson I think is that he allows his compassion for those in the Novus Ordo have an effect on his decisions regarding Novus Ordo Mass active attendance. We must separate the two. The question that he needs to answers clearly is this: Is active attendance at the Novus Ordo Mass an intrinsically evil act? I say, "Yes." Yes, he once said it was intrinsically evil in the setting of the old-sspx forming him. Now on his own, he poffers the man-centric position using compassion as the unitive end and God's religion as the devotion means. Completely backwards!
|
|