When the shepherd will not defend the dog is next in line
Dec 31, 2017 15:27:49 GMT
Post by Deus Vult on Dec 31, 2017 15:27:49 GMT
How significant is the barking dog in the background of this sermon! Even nature was in agreement. For when the shepherd will not defend, the dog is the next line of resistance and dogs by nature bark to warn of danger.
Who was telling the truth then and who is still speaking the truth? The priests of the true resistance.
www.inthissignyoushallconquer.com
Donations: Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Church
1730 N. Stillwell Road, Boston, KY 40107 USA
May 27, 2012
Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer
Today is Pentecost Sunday and the Epistle is taken from the Acts of the Apostles, Chapter 2:
"When the days of Pentecost were accomplished, they were all together in one place and
suddenly there came a sound from Heaven as of a mighty wind coming and it filled the whole
house where they were sitting. There appeared to them parched tongues as it were of fire and it
sat upon every one of them and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost. And they began to
speak with diverse tongues according as the Holy Ghost gave them to speak. Now there were
dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under Heaven. And when this was
noised abroad, the multitude came together and were confounded in mind, because that every
man heard them speak in his own tongue. And they were all amazed and wondered saying:
'Behold, are not all these that speak Galileans? And how have we heard every man in our own
tongue wherein we were born? Parthians and Medes and Elamites and inhabitants of
Mesopotamia, Judea, and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt, and the
parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews also and proselytes, Cretes and
Arabians: we have heard them speak in our own tongues the wonderful works of God."
And the gospel, stand for the gospel which is taken from that according to St. John Chapter 14:
"At that time, Jesus said to His disciples: 'If anyone love Me, he will keep My word and My
Father will love him; and We will come to him and We will make Our abode with him. He that
loveth Me not keepeth not My words. And the word which you have heard is not Mine; but the
Father's Who sent Me. These things I have spoken to you, abiding in you. But the Paraclete, the
Holy Ghost, Whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things and bring all
things to your mind, whatsoever I shall have said to you. Peace I leave with you. My peace I
give unto you; not as the world giveth do I give unto you. Let not your heart be troubled; not let
it be afraid. You have heard that I said to you: I go away, and I come unto you. If you loved
Me, you would indeed be glad, because I go to the Father; for the Father is greater than I. And
now I have told you before it comes to pass; that when it shall come to pass, you may believe. I
will not now speak many things with you. For the prince of this world cometh; and in Me he hath
not any thing. But that the world may know that I love the Father; and as the Father hath given
Me commandments, so do I." Thus are the words of today's Holy Gospel.
In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, Amen.
Today is Pentecost Sunday, this May 27th. It marks the end of the last great Rosary Crusade
today. We are supposed to have completed our 130 million Rosaries or however million Rosaries
we were supposed to have said before today. And in the last few weeks, there have been
announcements, announcements particularly since the end of April about the great miracle that is
supposed to happen today. Maybe it is happening right now. Here at 6 PM in the Philippines it is
11 in the morning, 10 in the morning in Rome. The miracle: The reunification. The miracle:
The regularization of the Society of Saint Pius X.
They have said that the pope will make an announcement probably by today, but a few days ago
Bishop Fellay told one of the other bishops that he was worried that it may not happen today
because of the leaking of the letters. On April 7th, three bishops: Bishop Williamson, Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, and Bishop de Galaretta wrote a letter to Bishop Fellay telling him 'Do not
make a deal with Modernist Rome. Do not sleep with the Modernists. Stand firm in the line of
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. Rome has not converted and it is not at this time converting. We
must stand firm for the truth as we have for the last 40 years. And do not go to bed with the
Modernists because if we do, they will make us Modernists. We will not convert them.'
And Bishop Fellay wrote back a response to the three bishops stating that, 'I am very concerned
about you three bishops because you sound like sedevacantists, as if you have no confidence in
the Holy Father. And I would have told you many things, but I've heard that you don't seem to
agree with me. And in conclusion, you three bishops created a dialectic [dialectic meaning a
conflict, a fight] between the truth and Faith on one side, and authority on the other. And this is
against the spirit of the priesthood.'
Those are the words of Bishop Fellay to the three bishops in the letter of April 14, 2012 on the
occasion of the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic, and it may be very symbolic
indeed because on this day, the SSPX ship is in danger of sinking. We are in the most perilous
times since the foundation of our Society and it is being hailed as a miracle. You've been
prepared for this day by miracles and miracles and miracles. But if we look back over the gospel,
we will find that Our Lord said in Matthew Chapter 24: "There will be many signs and wonders
in the last days to deceive if possible even the elect." "Many signs and wonders."
The first miracle was announced in 2007. It was the miracle of Summorum Pontificum and the
result of the first Rosary Crusade. What was this miracle? We were praying the Rosary primarily
that the pope would consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart in fulfillment of the request of
Our Lady of Fatima. But instead, what happened was the pope released Summorum Pontificum
in which he said the Latin Mass was never abrogated; and so, Bishop Fellay and Menzingen told
us, 'This was a great miracle. It was a miracle of your Rosaries. You must have confidence in the
miracle of the Rosaries.' It was NOT a miracle.
What does Summorum Pontificum say? Summorum Pontificum says that the Latin Mass was
never abrogated and therefore, 'I, Pope Benedict XVI, give a general permission to celebrate the
Latin Mass, which permission I expect to be implemented by September 14, 2007.' In other
words, the Mass was never abrogated which means you do not need permission. But, I am giving
you permission—the permission you don't need—and the permission is being given because of
my gracious charity as pope; and I expect this permission to be put into practice by September
14th. In other words, when I said it was never abrogated, that was a lie.
And then he adds conditions: 'This general permission to celebrate the Latin Tridentine Mass is
under conditions and the first condition is: You must accept the New Mass as the ordinary rite of
the Church and the Old Mass, the True Mass, is extraordinary which means only tolerated in
special circumstances.' This is an abomination!
The Blessed Virgin Mary does not approve of the New Mass. The Blessed Virgin Mary does not
accept the New Mass as ordinary; and She does not accept the true Sacrifice of the Mass of Her
Son as something only extraordinary; and She doesn't accept that the Mass is only by the gracious
permission of Pope Benedict XVI. The Mass is the center of our worship as Catholics and it has
been around for 2000 years and it doesn't depend on Benedict XVI. It was not a miracle but it
was hailed as such. 'Mary has heard your prayers.
And then comes the second miracle: The lifting of the excommunications announced on January
23, 2009. Four bishops had their excommunications lifted and Bishop Fellay asked that we sing
the Te Deum. Many priests refused throughout the whole world, but he asked that we sing the Te
Deum in thanksgiving for the lifting of the excommunications of the four bishops.
Now, if you go back and see the pictures of the events after 1988, you will discover that there
were six bishops involved. There was Bishop de Castro Mayer, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre,
and the four bishops; and all six of them were declared excommunicated; and the
excommunications are lifted only for four of them which means that according to Rome--
NeoModernist Rome--Bishop de Castro Mayer and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre remain
excommunicated. They are right now in Heaven. But according to the pope, they remain
excommunicated. And for what? For celebrating the Latin Tridentine Mass which was never
abrogated. If he really meant it was never abrogated back in 2007, then that would mean all those
who received punishment because it was believed to be abrogated—their punishments were null
and void and four bishops, or rather six bishops, were punished because they celebrated the Latin
Tridentine Mass and because they consecrated bishops so that priests could be ordained to
continue to celebrate that Mass and to preserve the Catholic Faith in the Church. It is another
abomination. Six bishops are excommunicated, so called, and they lifted four of them, claiming
the other two—their excommunication remains.
And furthermore, we have another problem: You cannot have your excommunication lifted
unless you are excommunicated. As I mentioned a few weeks ago in the Bohol-Cebu sermon,
you cannot have resurrection, you cannot rise from the dead, unless you are dead. If you are not
dead, you cannot rise. So likewise, if you are not excommunicated, you cannot have the
excommunication lifted. Bishop de Castro Mayer, Archbishop Lefebvre and the other four
bishops were never excommunicated. Therefore, the excommunication cannot be lifted and it
was not a miracle. It was a confusion. It was a deception to soften the hearts and to weaken the
will of the Catholics defending the Faith.
And then the doctrinal talks: Now we're going to make a deal. And after the doctrinal talks, it
was declared, 'Rome has not changed Its position. Rome still believes in Modernism. Rome is
still rejecting the Faith and the Society is still holding the Faith. Nothing has changed' so says
Bishop Fellay. And now, it's changed. Now we've got to make a deal. Now we're going to be
accepted and regularized. Now we're going to receive a personal prelature and all the documents
are secret, and all the communications are secret, and all the going back and forth is secret.
You don't keep truth a secret! You don't keep GOOD a secret, but you do keep lies a secret and
you do keep evil a secret, and you keep deception a secret. That's why all the secrecy of the last
several years—because if Bishop Fellay and Fr. Pfluger and Fr. Nely and the superiors of the
Society of Saint Pius X stood up boldly and told the truth to us a year ago or two years ago,
everyone would have rebelled. And so they said, 'Have confidence. You don't know all the
details. You're just foolish, stupid, idiotic, moronic sheep; and your job is to never think, only
pay, pray, and obey. You don't even know your Faith! You need to have confidence in the holy
superior. You don't need to know what he's doing with your Faith!'
There are secret communications. What are these secret communications about? They are about
the Faith and the Faith was not meant to be placed under a bushel, so said Jesus Christ, but upon
the candle stand. The Faith is meant to be publicly confessed and publicly professed unto the
time of death.
Now they avoided heresy. They avoided heretical statements until the last two weeks. Now the
deal is almost done. The betrayal is almost complete and they think we can do nothing about it
anymore, and they have the iron fist of Menzingen held over us.
Fr. Cardozo, a Spanish priest, an Argentinian priest I believe in South America—he preached
against the agreement a month and a half ago and now he can no longer say Mass in a Society
church. Now he is living in a monastery. Now he is in exile. Prepare for the iron fist to come
down again. And for those that do not kowtow, we have been asked to be silent. We don't know
the deal. We don't know the circumstances. We don't know the details. Why not? I'll read you
the details.
When Bishop Fellay was in Austria, he spoke to one of the priests telling him about the deal, the
personal prelature. He told him about the deal. Then, that priest told the faithful and that faithful
put it on the Internet. Here's the deal. Now remember, these are only rumors. So far every other
rumor has turned out to be true! Because Menzingen is telling us nothing, when a rumor comes
out, they verify that it is true. Here's the latest:
What is in the deal of the personal prelature?
Number One: The Pope will decide on who will be bishops of the SSPX, who will replace those
who leave or who do not choose to go along with the agreement. Those bishops will be free to
leave and they will be replaced. Who are those bishops? Bishop Williamson, Bishop de
Galaretta, and Bishop Tissier de Mallerais. They are free to leave and they will be replaced.
Who decides? His name is now Pope Benedict XVI. He became a cardinal in 1977, Joseph
Cardinal Ratzinger and since that time he has devoted his Cardinal life to destroying Catholic
Tradition. He was the one who arranged the deal in 1987 for a small group called Mater Dei,
nine seminarians who left Archbishop Lefebvre to form a small group in Rome and it fell apart;
they were deceived.
Cardinal Ratzinger was the one who promised Dom Gerard, who was the closest friend--a
Benedictine monk and the closest friend of Archbishop Lefebvre--to betray Archbishop Lefebvre
in 1988 and not go along with the consecrations, and he told Dom Gerard, 'You want me to visit
your monastery? I will make you an abbot but you have to come to Rome and you, Dom Gerard,
have to concelebrate the New Mass with the pope and I'll be there watching you to make sure you
really concelebrate.' Dom Gerard agreed because he wanted to be an abbot. He died with his
abbot's mitre three years ago. What was the price? How much did it cost? Who was the one
who arranged the betrayal? Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger.
In 1989 or 1990, Monsignor Gilles Wach comes to Rome. 'I want to start a Traditional Institute
which we will call the Institute of Christ the King.' Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger tells him: 'You
can start your Institute AFTER you concelebrate a New Mass with me. Let me see you
concelebrate the New Mass, then I'll sign your agreement; I'll make you approved.'
That same year, Bishop Zanic comes from Yugoslavia. He visits Rome. He visits Cardinal
Ratzinger and he says, 'Cardinal Ratzinger, you are the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith and I am the Bishop of Medjugorje in Yugoslavia; and in Medjugorje, they are liars.
In Medjugorje they are enemies of God. In Medjugorje, the priests are sleeping with nuns. In
Medjugorje, this is a fake miracle and people are coming from all over the world and I have
condemned it but they won't listen to me. Can you please make a public proclamation from
Rome condemning Medjugorje?' and do you know what Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger said?
'Zanic, you take care of it. There are too many friends of Medjugorje here. I will not condemn it
but I agree with you.' His name was Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger.
In the year 2000, the lie of releasing the Third Secret of Fatima. Cardinal Bertone makes the
announcement and lies to the world and tells them: 'We are releasing the Third Secret' when they
knew it was a lie. Who was sitting next to him? Who was in charge? Who was the man in
charge? His name was Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith. He let Bertone do the dirty talking but he was the one in charge and he sat there
while Bertone spoke a lie.
Who is the most responsible man in the Catholic Church for suppressing the Secret of Fatima?
He used to be called Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger; he now goes by Pope Benedict XVI. He will be
the one to choose our new bishops.
Number 2: No new structures are allowed to be erected without the approval of the diocesan
bishops. Do you think Bishop Carpalia will approve of our new church that we want to build
down at the bottom of the hill? Do you think the new bishop will approve of our new church at
the bottom of the hill? 'No new structures without the permission of the diocesan bishops.' That
is the DEATH of the growth of Tradition.
Number 3: (It gets better. Be patient.) 'Any buildings less than three years old must be closed
down. Any buildings older than three years old may remain up and running.'
I was the pastor in Denver, Colorado, and we built a church there, a large church called St.
Isidore's. It was completed in 2001. That's more than three years ago, so the building can be
saved but it became a priory only three years ago and the priory building, which is on a different
property, was donated to the Society a year and a half ago. Will the priests in the Denver priory
have to leave their priory? And what about Davao? What about Gensan? What about all of
Mindanao? All of Leyte? All of Bohol and Cebu? Are we really here, canonically speaking?
The Society of Saint Pius X doesn't own any property in these areas, except for the ones at the
bottom of the hill, but that's less than three years and there is no church there.
We own only property in Manila and in Iloilo and in Bacolod. So maybe the Society is only in
Manila, Iloilo, and Bacolod and maybe we're not canonically here! So maybe we have to ask
permission to keep saying Mass in Gensan, to go and visit the stranded Faithful in Zamboanga.
And now we gotta know, 'Can I go and bring Jesus Christ to the souls in need? PLEASE give me
permission!' 'I'm so sorry, but the bishop said, 'You can go to hell.' 'I'm so sorry!'' or 'I'm so
happy! The bishop allowed me to be a Catholic priest.' You should also be happy because the
bishop allowed you to be Catholic!
As we mentioned a couple of months ago, when you get married you come before the priest and
you kneel down in front of the altar and you say, "I do" in front of the priest and in front of the
altar and you are married until death do you part. You don't come back to Father seven years
later, "Father, can I still be married?" "It's done! It's finished!" Live a miserable life until you
die! You can't change it.
So likewise, when we are baptized, we're Catholic and no pope can take away my Catholic Faith
and no bishop can take away my Catholic Faith and no priest can take away my Catholic Faith, and no king and no magistrate and no authority can take away my Catholic Faith. But now, we
gotta ask permission to be Catholic.
On June 13, 1988, Archbishop Lefebvre gave a talk to the four bishops. One of them was then
Bishop Bernard Fellay and at the end of his talk, which was recorded, he said, "The saints and the
martyrs always had to choose between Faith and authority. They chose Faith over authority."
That was in 1988.
In 2012, Bishop Fellay says, "You three bishops make a dialectic between truth and Faith on the
one side and authority on the other and this is against the spirit of the priesthood." In other
words, authority can never be against Faith; and if there seems to be a conflict between authority
and Faith, you must obey the authority. That is exactly the opposite of what Archbishop Lefebvre
said to the four bishops elect. Did he forget what the Archbishop told him 24 years ago?
And now the errors. The warning was from many priests and from the three bishops: 'Bishop
Fellay, do not go to bed with the Modernists because when you lie down with dogs you get up
with fleas. If we make a deal with Rome, we will enter into the Roman mystery and we will
become Modernists. Modernists will not become Catholics.'
It has already happened. On May 11, 2012, CNS (Catholic News Service) visited Menzigen,
Switzerland. Many priests have tried calling there but they don't answer the phone. The priests
in Mexico who are completely against this foolish agreement have tried to call Menzingen; they've
tried to get a message through to Menzingen; but they're not available. They're not available. But
they WERE available for the Novus Ordo Catholic News Service and they had lots of time to talk
to Bishop Fellay. The video cameras came in and the bright lights for one of the main outlets of
communication of heresy in the United States, and the Catholic News Service asked Bishop
Fellay some questions:
'What do you think about the SSPX versus Rome? Is there a fight between the SSPX and Rome?'
and Bishop Fellay said, 'No. There's no battle between the SSPX and Rome. That's not the right
way to look at it. It's rather that there are some bad men in positions of authority.'
'What about the Council? You SSPX people are always against the Council of Vatican II. What
about the Council?' And Bishop Fellay said these words, "We learned from the doctrinal
discussions that what we would have before condemned as an error of the Council was in fact not
an error of the Council but only an error of the common interpretation of the Council."
Let's go over that again. 'There is nothing wrong with the Council. The only problem is that of
abuses and the bad interpretation of the Council.' This has been the line of the liberal Novus
Ordo for the last 50 years.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1965 wrote a book called, I Accuse the Council. Not I Accuse
Those People That Have a Bad Interpretation of the Council. Not I Accuse the Misunderstanding
of the Council. I Accuse the Council. The Council teaches error. The Council teaches heresy,
particularly the errors of Religious Liberty and Ecumenism but Bishop Fellay learned from the
doctrinal talks that what we have taught over the last 40 years is incorrect. He has already
converted. He says he's going to go in to convert the Modernists but he's already speaking
Modernist language.
And then the CNS reporter asked him: 'What about Religious Liberty? We know you SSPX guys.
You don't like Religious Liberty. So Bishop Fellay, tell us about Religious Liberty and the
Council.'
And Bishop Fellay said, "The Religious Liberty as it is defined in the Council is a very, very
limited liberty." "It's very limited."
If you go to Mong Hing Teochew you get unlimited rice. If you go to a regular restaurant, you
get limited rice and Bishop Fellay says the liberty spoken of in the Council is very limited.
Religious Liberty as it is spoken of in Vatican Council II is not limited. It's heretical! It's wrong!
It's against the 2000-years' teaching of our Church. It leads to the damnation of souls and has led
to it down the last 50 years; and what are the effects of this false idea that a man has a right to
believe what is wrong is that millions of souls have left the Church.
I just picked up three Protestant ministers (I didn't know they were ministers at the time but there
were three guys at the side of the road in Bohol when I was dropping off Fr. Tim so I picked them
up.) They wanted to go into town and I brought them into town. It turned out they were three
Protestant ministers. They're in Hong Kong and they are very happy with their ecumenical
relations with the Catholic Church in Hong Kong.
Ecumenism and the false Religious Liberty are alive and well and Bishop Fellay says, "It is
limited" whereas we used to say it's heretical! "Limited" means you don't get to eat as much.
"Heretical" means it's poison! He is now speaking error publicly and the whole world can see it.
You can Google it and YouTube. The articles are available and it's on YouTube--Catholic News
Service interviewing the Superior General of the Society of Saint Pius X.
And then they ask him: 'Do you think that Vatican Council II is really a part of the great
Tradition of the Church?' and he said, "I hope so." A bishop of the Church says, "I hope so."
This Council is known well and even the men who promote the Council, they even admit that this
Council is totally different than all the other Councils. This Council is not part of the great
Tradition of the Church. This Council is other. This Council teaches other than what was taught
before and Bishop Fellay says, 'Rome is changing. Rome is converting.'
Is Pope Benedict XVI converting? If he's converted, why is he worshiping to Mecca a few
months ago?--praying and bowing in the Muslim form of prayer to Mecca? John Paul II never
did that! Why is Pope Benedict XVI telling the Muslims that their religion has so much to offer
to us Catholics and our religion? Why is he saying to the Jews that they don't need to become a
follower of Jesus Christ in order to go to Heaven? He is teaching the same heresies and the same
Modernism that he has always taught, only he's an expert in subtle words. He knows the right
buttons to push. He knows the right words to say to deceive Traditional Catholics, such words as
"never abrogated."
Now Bishop Fellay is telling us we don't have to change anything. We don't have to give in
anything. We're gonna be able to walk in without any changes but Rome is saying you gotta
accept Vatican II.
Now we have the Doctrinal Preamble. Finally, the bishops got their hands on the Doctrinal
Preamble in the last couple of days, that secret Doctrinal Preamble. Ambiguities. Foolishness.
But let me give the example we gave a couple of weeks ago in Bohol: It was still before the
Ascension, so it was the Paschal candle that was there. So we will give the example of this light.
Now let us suppose I love light bulbs. I love light bulbs. And you HATE light bulbs. You hate
light bulbs. You hate light bulbs. I love light bulbs, so we don't get along because you have
different ideas about light bulbs. Now we decide that we need to become friends, so therefore I
write up a document: "I declare that WE love light bulbs." And you say, "No! because I hate
light bulbs." So you write up an agreement and your agreement says, "We hate light bulbs" and I
say, "No! because I like light bulbs." We got a problem.
So then a wise man comes and he says, "I can make you friends! We will make another
agreement which is, 'You and I are near light bulbs. I agree that I am near a light bulb and you
agree that you are near a light bulb so let's be friends!' Did anything change? Do you like light
bulbs? No. You still hate them. Do I hate light bulbs? No. I still like them. But we made an
agreement. We had a Doctrinal Preamble which is called QUACK! QUACK! Meaningless
garbage! And the meaningless garbage says, 'we're both next to light bulbs.'
So now, we're gonna make a Doctrinal Preamble with Rome. Rome believes in Modernism.
Rome hates the Catholic Faith. Rome is living the prophecy of Mary and the Blessed Virgin
Mary said, "Rome will lose the Faith" and if we unite with Rome we also lose the Faith. Mary
knows more about Rome than Menzingen. The Blessed Virgin Mary, our Holy Mother Mary, said
at Quito, Ecuador 400 years ago that at the end of the 20th century the priests will lose their
compass--they will lose the Divine compass, and the Church will attack the seven sacraments and
they will abuse and destroy all seven of them, and the priests will not know what it means to be a
priest of God, and there will be a great loss of Faith. That's what the Blessed Virgin Mary said
400 years ago. She knew more back then than Menzingen knows today. Mary knows better! And
in 1846, the Blessed Virgin Mary said, "In the 20th century, Rome will lose the Faith and it will
be the seat of the Anti-Christ." She knows better than Menzingen.
According to Menzingen, it is getting better now. According to the Blessed Virgin Mary, it
CANNOT get better until Russia is consecrated to the Immaculate Heart. Russia has not been
consecrated; therefore, things are NOT better; and if Bishop Fellay and the office help think
things are better, they think differently than our Holy Mother. We will stick with our Holy
Mother, and the Blessed Virgin Mary told the people of Ecuador and the entire world. She said
the same thing at La Salette. She said the same thing at Fatima and again at Akita, Japan most
recently in 1973. Mary said, "When the devil has had his greatest conquest, when it is the darkest
hour, when it seems as though the kingdom of hell is about to conquer, and the kingdom of
Heaven is about to completely collapse, THIS will be My hour. This will be My hour, the hour of
Mary. This will be the hour that I will show in a most magnificent way My power and crush the
devil."
So what do we followers of Mary believe? We followers of Mary believe that things are going to
continue to get worse until SHE fixes it; and therefore, as the world gets worse, we have a double
heart: One part of our heart is sorrowful because of the number of souls that are being lost but
another part of our heart is filled with confidence and filled with great joy because as things get
worse, it means we're getting closer to the Marian victory.
The natural method that is the temptation of adultery is that being given to Menzingen right now:
'Go inside of Rome. Mix with the Modernists. You'll be able to be a good influence, you holy
SSPX priests. You wonderful SSPX priests! You're gonna come in and your halo is gonna glow
to the Modernists.' I'm gonna walk in and, "Oh! He's SO holy! I don't think I'm gonna be a
Modernist anymore! I feel so guilty about being a Modernist!" It isn't going to work.
I was speaking with a priest, a classmate of mine in Mexico, a very gentle, a very kind-hearted, a
very soft-spoken priest. He told me, "Is Menzingen trying to take the truth out of the mouth of the
prophets?" A prophet is meant to speak the truth, and how can we be a prophet if the truth is
taken out of our mouths?
Father Iscara, a professor at St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary, SSPX, in early May presented a
document for all of us to read on the "Economy of Silence"; that the way that St. Basil
condemned the error of the Arians was by hugging them more often, by being nicer to the Arians.
It's a policy of Hug the Heretic and He'll Be Better—that St. Basil didn't use offensive language.
He didn't use the clear, Catholic terminology because it would offend the Arians and therefore he
found a nice way of saying the truth that wouldn't offend the Arians. Try that method with
Jeremiah, the prophet. Did Jesus Christ try that method?
Our Lord Jesus Christ when He was in front of the Pharisees said, "You brood of vipers!" When
He was in front of Caiphas on Good Friday morning and He was about to be sent to death, He
told Caiphas, "Today I go to be crucified but behold! The day will come when you, Caiphas,
shall see the Son of Man in great power and majesty" [Jesus Christ speaking of Himself]. You,
Caiphas, will see the Son of Man coming in great power and majesty and He shall judge you."
This is going to happen at the end of the world.
The prophet must speak the truth and must condemn the errors and hugging heretics does not
make them into saints! We must condemn the errors.
And now another Modernist comes forth. His name is Fr. Celier. He is being brought before the
English-speaking world for the first time. You can find him on the SSPX.org web site. Fr. Celier
is a priest ordained by Archbishop Lefebvre in 1986, an SSPX priest. In 2007 he wrote a book
and in this book he talks about the union between the New Mass and the Old and that we could
have some kind of hybrid Mass by which the New and the Old could somehow mutually enrich
each other. When he tried to sell this book in France, the French Traditional Catholics about
killed him so he had to be put on the back burner until May of 2012. Now, Bishop Fellay has put
him forward again. Only this time, Fr. Celier is teaching us the proper interpretation of the
teaching of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
See, we all know Archbishop Lefebvre said No to NeoModernist Rome. We know Archbishop
Lefebvre said 'Have nothing to do with the Novus Ordo heresy.' We know that he stood firmly
and unequivocally for the truth against all odds. 'But you know what? Let's go back and look at
it again' says Fr. Celier. 'Let us remember that he was speaking in specific times according to
practical circumstances that were prevalent at that time in 1975, in 1988.' You know what that's called? The heresy of Modernism.
What do the Modernists teach? The Modernists teach that the Council of Trent was wonderful in
1545. Vatican Council I was wonderful in 1870. They were the right medicine for the Church at
that time. But in the 1990s and in the 2000s, they no longer apply. Now, we need a new
doctrine. We need a new Council. We need a new way of looking at things. Modernists believe
that truth changes with history just like evolution of species. And so now, Fr. Celier, a priest of
the Society of Saint Pius X, the Society that condemned Modernism, is going to use Modernism
in order to reinterpret Archbishop Lefebvre.
And now come the re-education classes. In October of 2012, there's going to be a meeting in
Kansas City in the US at the headquarters of the SSPX and they're going to talk about the papacy.
There's a big banner with a smiling Pope Benedict XVI. St. Pius X's picture cannot be found.
We're gonna learn about papal authority, or we're gonna re-learn. We're gonna learn about the
danger of Sedevacantism. We're going to learn about the importance of 'obedience, obedience,
obedience! Don't stand for the Faith over obedience!'
As of May of 2012, many, many priests of the Society of Saint Pius X worry and are firmly
against this agreement; but they are also afraid because of the iron fist of Menzingen that has
already crushed some. I go to America next week. I come back in theory July 5th. Will I survive
the Modernists? This may be the summer of the divorce.
And they tried to keep it a secret until the last moment. Father Tim pointed out in a sermon last
week about adultery, adultery—a sin against the family. Adultery occurs when a man is with a
woman that is not his wife, but adultery can also happen to a priest. A priest is a man of truth
who is a follower of THE TRUTH, Who is Jesus Christ, and we are said to be "another Christ"
which means we are meant to be another walking Truth. Who sees a priest should see the Truth.
Who hears the words of a priest should hear the words of Christ and the words of Christ are the
words of the Truth because He said, "I AM THE TRUTH"; not "I am the obedience"; not "I am
the authority"; "I AM THE TRUTH."
How does adultery happen to a priest? Fr. Tim pointed out last week that adultery happens to a
priest when truth in the mind of the priest is co-habitating and mingling with error in the mind of
the same priest. If a man lives with a woman, we call that living in sin. A priest lives in sin when
he has the truth in one side of his mind and error and heresy on the other. We cannot sleep with
the Modernists! We cannot be united with the Modernists because if we are united with the
Modernists, the truth side will be destroyed by the lying side.
What happens when a man sleeps with a woman who is not his wife? First of all, there are no
legitimate children. So likewise, when a priest mixes truth with lies he can have no legitimate
children of Faith. The Faith is dead! And furthermore, if there ARE children, they will be
bastards.
The New Mass is a bastard Mass. The new priests are bastard priests. Archbishop Lefebvre, and
remember, it was back in the old days, you must remember the circumstances—if you believe in
Modernism remember the circumstances—but if you're a Catholic only remember the truth. And
the truth is Archbishop Lefebvre said, "The New Mass is a bastard Mass!" Why did he say it was
a bastard Mass? Because it is a Mass in which a Catholic priest celebrates Protestant rites.
Catholic/Protestant co-habitating bastards. Adultery.
What is going to happen? Maybe we are going to have to go back to the catacombs again. Many
priests are afraid. Maybe we won't be able to come back to our rectories. Maybe we will be
driven out to the streets. There are many against in May of 2012, but when the ax falls, how
many will stay against?
In 1965, 250 bishops at the end of the Council said, "We will stand firm against the Council!"
Two hundred and fifty bishops. In 1969, four years later, one of them founded a seminary, one
out of 250. Later on, a second one stayed faithful in his diocese. Two out of 250, but in 1965,
they were all united.
The SSPX is now, for the first time in history, in a practical state of division. Even if Bishop
Fellay doesn't sign on the dotted line, even if the pope doesn't come through with a miracle today
he will come through with it tomorrow or next week. From now on, there's going to be liberal
priests in the Society and there's going to be priests faithful to Archbishop Lefebvre. Up until this
day, the smart priests and the stupid priests, young and old, lazy and hardworking—all of them
believed the same Faith! But now, you will find two directions.
Pope Benedict XVI is the master of disaster. He has been destroying and dividing Tradition for
the last 20, 30 years. Now, he has Bishop Fellay in a diabolical disorientation. He has the bishop
believing that the new friends in Rome are gonna help him, and he's gonna help them become
good Catholics. He doesn't need his old friends anymore. He doesn't need the three bishops
anymore. And you will see a purge, baring a miracle, you will see a purge. 'This priest was
expelled from the Society because he's disobedient, that one because he's crazy, this one—you
know—we can't tell you—you don't want to know.'
We must stand firm for the Faith. Many souls are in grave jeopardy today because Bishop Fellay
has decided to play with fire and smile, because he's got the grace of state. FAITH is greater than
the grace of state! FAITH IS FIRST. And the father of the family does not have the right to
jeopardize his family. He doesn't have the right to tear it apart. He doesn't have the right to
compromise. For what? What promises have they made him? They've lied to the others.
They've destroyed the others.
You know that Fr. Laguerie, the Superior of the Good Shepherd Institute which was started in
2006—he called Fr. de Cacqueray a month ago. Fr. de Cacqueray is a French priest who came
here. Back in 2006, Fr. Laguerie was in his church and he wasn't going to leave it. Fr. de
Cacqueray came in by himself. He walked up the center isle with 250 people who were all
behind Fr. Laguerie. He stood in front of all the people and he said, 'Fr. Laguerie, get out of this
church! This is a SSPX church. You're not following our rules. Get out! And you people: Get
out!' Fr. Laguerie said, 'I am happy that you came to me like a man and you spoke to me like a
man and you condemned me like a man. I go out' and he went out. Six years later, Fr. Laguerie
calls up Fr. de Cacqueray and says, 'Father, remember me? I'm the priest you threw out in the
correct way you should have done it. I am telling you, don't make a deal with Rome! I did! We
made a deal six years ago and now they're crushing us! You saw the document of March 23rd
where Cardinal Pozzo, the clown, commands us to live according to the spirit of Summorum
Pontificum; that we have to accept the New Mass; that we have to incorporate the Catechism of
the Catholic Church into our seminary; that we have to teach Modernism and crap in our
seminary. We are trapped! But they told us six years ago, 'No conditions.' I am calling you
because of the respect I have for you because you treated me like a man, so I'm telling you' so Fr.
de Cacqueray passed on the word to Bishop Fellay. He's not turning back.
Also, the last part of this, according to Bishop Fellay--the General Chapter which is going to meet
in July will not be a meeting to discuss an acceptance of the agreement because it is already
accepted, but simply to learn what the new statutes will be under the new agreement with Rome.
We've got to go back to re-education classes. I'm not going to those classes. The Faith does not
need re-education.
This may be my last Sunday in Davao. We do not know what will happen. The iron fist is
above. Fear is below, but the truth is larger than both. Many of the faithful are afraid all over the
world.
And lastly, let us consider Moses. After 40 days on the mountain; in fact, it was 48 days because
he went up to the top of the mountain and prayed for 8 days and then he went to the higher part of
the mountain and remained for 40 days, so in fact it was 48 days. At the end of the 40 days, he
came down to the middle of the mountain where Joshua was waiting and they began to walk
down that mountain and they heard noise like this in the background. And Joshua said to Moses,
'Moses, let us hurry to the camp because I hear the sound of battle! I hear the sound of war down
in the Jewish camp!' Moses said, 'Don't hurry. It's not the sound of war, Joshua. It's not the
sound of battle, Joshua. It is the sound of laughter. It is the sound of the minstrels playing. It is
the sound of my people Israel worshipping a golden calf, a golden calf that was made by my own
brother, Aaron, during the time that I was receiving the Commandments and all the prescriptions
of the Old Law from God. While I was talking with God over the last 40 days, they were talking
to the devil! Joshua, you do not hear the sound of battle.'
Now this is what we think: Menzingen is telling us, 'We're gonna go in and fight! We're gonna go
in and do battle! We're gonna go in and fight the Modernists.' No, they're not. They're gonna go
in and drink with Modernists. They're gonna go in and sing songs with Modernists. They're
gonna go in and pray with Modernists. They're gonna go in and worship the golden calf.
Moses continued down the mountain. When he arrived at the bottom, they were all surprised to
see him and they were afraid, and they were right to be afraid. It was a bad day to meet Moses.
Moses came down that mountain and he said, 'These are the Commandments I received from
God. Here is their value in front of you' and he took those Commandments and he threw them on
the ground and they broke into pieces. And then he said these words: 'Who is on the Lord's
side?' No argument. No theological discussion with the Jews. No telling the Jews all the
beautiful things that happened on top of the mountain. He simply said, 'Who is on the Lord's
side? Whoever is on the Lord's side, come over here. Whoever is not, stand over there' and they
divided. Still no theological discussions. Moses then pulled out a sword and he said, 'Those of
you who are on the Lord's side, kill every one of them! Leave not one alive!' and 40,000 were
killed on that day. It was a bloody day.
We are at a time in which arguments have already been made. They already know the tune of the
Modernists. They already know the tricks and the Modernists say, "Obedience over Faith!"
We've heard those words before. Argument, though it must occasionally be done, is not the
answer. Now we must decide who is on the Lord's side.
There are two excommunicated bishops who remain excommunicated and they are on the Lord's
side. One of them is Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. He's on the Lord's side. The other is Bishop
de Castro Mayer. He's on the Lord's side, and they're both excommunicated from the
NeoModernist Church. How we have been afraid of excommunication! We should rather be
afraid of offending God, not of excommunication.
And lastly, we'll read from a letter—it takes a while to get to the bottom of it here—from English
Catholics of the Society of Saint Pius X, an open letter to Bishop Fellay. We'll read here only the
conclusion, a letter saying that we must stand for Tradition.
"Bishop Fellay, which Bishop Fellay do we listen to? The one that said in 1999 that the Council
is erroneous and not just the hermeneutics of the Council, or the one in 2012 that says there's
nothing wrong with the Council, only the hermeneutics? Bishop Fellay in 1999 said, 'The
Council is wrong.' Bishop Fellay in 2012 says, 'The Council is right.' Which Bishop Fellay do
we listen to? We will listen to the one that was faithful to Archbishop Lefebvre and Catholic
Tradition. Here is the conclusion of this long article which we will not read; you can get it off the
Internet:
"It is our fervent hope [these English Catholics, many who have signed and sent this letter on
May 19th] it is our fervent hope that the future of the SSPX and the future of Tradition are, as in
the days past, one and the same thing. It is our hope that the SSPX continues to be the same as
Tradition. Whatever may be the case, however, we will do all within our power to believe and
spread the truth, to denounce error and in so doing to remain faithful to Our Lord and His
Church, to Tradition and the legacy of Archbishop Lefebvre whatever the cost and whether Your
Excellency chooses to abandon us or to remain with us. St. Pius X, ora pro nobis."
As Bishop Williamson used to say many times, the SSPX is a pilot light. It carries the light of
Faith. If it should ever abandon that light, then we must abandon the SSPX. Archbishop
Lefebvre used to say, "I teach you the truth. Follow it as long as I teach it. But if the day comes
that I don't teach it anymore, then abandon me for we must be followers of the truth, followers of
the Faith."
Now let us pray for a miracle and the miracle is that enough priests and enough faithful stand up
and preserve the legacy of the Society of Saint Pius X which is to continue to stand firm for the
Faith, and that Bishop Fellay realizes and wakes up from his stupor and realizes that he is being
deceived by the devil and comes back to the firm teaching of the truth, to the firm condemnation
of errors and strengthens us in that truth and continues to condemn the errors and stays faithful to
the legacy of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the Society of Saint Pius X, and what is necessary for
the continuation of our Holy Church: THE FAITH! THE FAITH!
Viva Cristo Rey!
Who was telling the truth then and who is still speaking the truth? The priests of the true resistance.
www.inthissignyoushallconquer.com
Donations: Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Church
1730 N. Stillwell Road, Boston, KY 40107 USA
May 27, 2012
Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer
Today is Pentecost Sunday and the Epistle is taken from the Acts of the Apostles, Chapter 2:
"When the days of Pentecost were accomplished, they were all together in one place and
suddenly there came a sound from Heaven as of a mighty wind coming and it filled the whole
house where they were sitting. There appeared to them parched tongues as it were of fire and it
sat upon every one of them and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost. And they began to
speak with diverse tongues according as the Holy Ghost gave them to speak. Now there were
dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under Heaven. And when this was
noised abroad, the multitude came together and were confounded in mind, because that every
man heard them speak in his own tongue. And they were all amazed and wondered saying:
'Behold, are not all these that speak Galileans? And how have we heard every man in our own
tongue wherein we were born? Parthians and Medes and Elamites and inhabitants of
Mesopotamia, Judea, and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt, and the
parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews also and proselytes, Cretes and
Arabians: we have heard them speak in our own tongues the wonderful works of God."
And the gospel, stand for the gospel which is taken from that according to St. John Chapter 14:
"At that time, Jesus said to His disciples: 'If anyone love Me, he will keep My word and My
Father will love him; and We will come to him and We will make Our abode with him. He that
loveth Me not keepeth not My words. And the word which you have heard is not Mine; but the
Father's Who sent Me. These things I have spoken to you, abiding in you. But the Paraclete, the
Holy Ghost, Whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things and bring all
things to your mind, whatsoever I shall have said to you. Peace I leave with you. My peace I
give unto you; not as the world giveth do I give unto you. Let not your heart be troubled; not let
it be afraid. You have heard that I said to you: I go away, and I come unto you. If you loved
Me, you would indeed be glad, because I go to the Father; for the Father is greater than I. And
now I have told you before it comes to pass; that when it shall come to pass, you may believe. I
will not now speak many things with you. For the prince of this world cometh; and in Me he hath
not any thing. But that the world may know that I love the Father; and as the Father hath given
Me commandments, so do I." Thus are the words of today's Holy Gospel.
In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, Amen.
Today is Pentecost Sunday, this May 27th. It marks the end of the last great Rosary Crusade
today. We are supposed to have completed our 130 million Rosaries or however million Rosaries
we were supposed to have said before today. And in the last few weeks, there have been
announcements, announcements particularly since the end of April about the great miracle that is
supposed to happen today. Maybe it is happening right now. Here at 6 PM in the Philippines it is
11 in the morning, 10 in the morning in Rome. The miracle: The reunification. The miracle:
The regularization of the Society of Saint Pius X.
They have said that the pope will make an announcement probably by today, but a few days ago
Bishop Fellay told one of the other bishops that he was worried that it may not happen today
because of the leaking of the letters. On April 7th, three bishops: Bishop Williamson, Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, and Bishop de Galaretta wrote a letter to Bishop Fellay telling him 'Do not
make a deal with Modernist Rome. Do not sleep with the Modernists. Stand firm in the line of
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. Rome has not converted and it is not at this time converting. We
must stand firm for the truth as we have for the last 40 years. And do not go to bed with the
Modernists because if we do, they will make us Modernists. We will not convert them.'
And Bishop Fellay wrote back a response to the three bishops stating that, 'I am very concerned
about you three bishops because you sound like sedevacantists, as if you have no confidence in
the Holy Father. And I would have told you many things, but I've heard that you don't seem to
agree with me. And in conclusion, you three bishops created a dialectic [dialectic meaning a
conflict, a fight] between the truth and Faith on one side, and authority on the other. And this is
against the spirit of the priesthood.'
Those are the words of Bishop Fellay to the three bishops in the letter of April 14, 2012 on the
occasion of the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic, and it may be very symbolic
indeed because on this day, the SSPX ship is in danger of sinking. We are in the most perilous
times since the foundation of our Society and it is being hailed as a miracle. You've been
prepared for this day by miracles and miracles and miracles. But if we look back over the gospel,
we will find that Our Lord said in Matthew Chapter 24: "There will be many signs and wonders
in the last days to deceive if possible even the elect." "Many signs and wonders."
The first miracle was announced in 2007. It was the miracle of Summorum Pontificum and the
result of the first Rosary Crusade. What was this miracle? We were praying the Rosary primarily
that the pope would consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart in fulfillment of the request of
Our Lady of Fatima. But instead, what happened was the pope released Summorum Pontificum
in which he said the Latin Mass was never abrogated; and so, Bishop Fellay and Menzingen told
us, 'This was a great miracle. It was a miracle of your Rosaries. You must have confidence in the
miracle of the Rosaries.' It was NOT a miracle.
What does Summorum Pontificum say? Summorum Pontificum says that the Latin Mass was
never abrogated and therefore, 'I, Pope Benedict XVI, give a general permission to celebrate the
Latin Mass, which permission I expect to be implemented by September 14, 2007.' In other
words, the Mass was never abrogated which means you do not need permission. But, I am giving
you permission—the permission you don't need—and the permission is being given because of
my gracious charity as pope; and I expect this permission to be put into practice by September
14th. In other words, when I said it was never abrogated, that was a lie.
And then he adds conditions: 'This general permission to celebrate the Latin Tridentine Mass is
under conditions and the first condition is: You must accept the New Mass as the ordinary rite of
the Church and the Old Mass, the True Mass, is extraordinary which means only tolerated in
special circumstances.' This is an abomination!
The Blessed Virgin Mary does not approve of the New Mass. The Blessed Virgin Mary does not
accept the New Mass as ordinary; and She does not accept the true Sacrifice of the Mass of Her
Son as something only extraordinary; and She doesn't accept that the Mass is only by the gracious
permission of Pope Benedict XVI. The Mass is the center of our worship as Catholics and it has
been around for 2000 years and it doesn't depend on Benedict XVI. It was not a miracle but it
was hailed as such. 'Mary has heard your prayers.
And then comes the second miracle: The lifting of the excommunications announced on January
23, 2009. Four bishops had their excommunications lifted and Bishop Fellay asked that we sing
the Te Deum. Many priests refused throughout the whole world, but he asked that we sing the Te
Deum in thanksgiving for the lifting of the excommunications of the four bishops.
Now, if you go back and see the pictures of the events after 1988, you will discover that there
were six bishops involved. There was Bishop de Castro Mayer, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre,
and the four bishops; and all six of them were declared excommunicated; and the
excommunications are lifted only for four of them which means that according to Rome--
NeoModernist Rome--Bishop de Castro Mayer and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre remain
excommunicated. They are right now in Heaven. But according to the pope, they remain
excommunicated. And for what? For celebrating the Latin Tridentine Mass which was never
abrogated. If he really meant it was never abrogated back in 2007, then that would mean all those
who received punishment because it was believed to be abrogated—their punishments were null
and void and four bishops, or rather six bishops, were punished because they celebrated the Latin
Tridentine Mass and because they consecrated bishops so that priests could be ordained to
continue to celebrate that Mass and to preserve the Catholic Faith in the Church. It is another
abomination. Six bishops are excommunicated, so called, and they lifted four of them, claiming
the other two—their excommunication remains.
And furthermore, we have another problem: You cannot have your excommunication lifted
unless you are excommunicated. As I mentioned a few weeks ago in the Bohol-Cebu sermon,
you cannot have resurrection, you cannot rise from the dead, unless you are dead. If you are not
dead, you cannot rise. So likewise, if you are not excommunicated, you cannot have the
excommunication lifted. Bishop de Castro Mayer, Archbishop Lefebvre and the other four
bishops were never excommunicated. Therefore, the excommunication cannot be lifted and it
was not a miracle. It was a confusion. It was a deception to soften the hearts and to weaken the
will of the Catholics defending the Faith.
And then the doctrinal talks: Now we're going to make a deal. And after the doctrinal talks, it
was declared, 'Rome has not changed Its position. Rome still believes in Modernism. Rome is
still rejecting the Faith and the Society is still holding the Faith. Nothing has changed' so says
Bishop Fellay. And now, it's changed. Now we've got to make a deal. Now we're going to be
accepted and regularized. Now we're going to receive a personal prelature and all the documents
are secret, and all the communications are secret, and all the going back and forth is secret.
You don't keep truth a secret! You don't keep GOOD a secret, but you do keep lies a secret and
you do keep evil a secret, and you keep deception a secret. That's why all the secrecy of the last
several years—because if Bishop Fellay and Fr. Pfluger and Fr. Nely and the superiors of the
Society of Saint Pius X stood up boldly and told the truth to us a year ago or two years ago,
everyone would have rebelled. And so they said, 'Have confidence. You don't know all the
details. You're just foolish, stupid, idiotic, moronic sheep; and your job is to never think, only
pay, pray, and obey. You don't even know your Faith! You need to have confidence in the holy
superior. You don't need to know what he's doing with your Faith!'
There are secret communications. What are these secret communications about? They are about
the Faith and the Faith was not meant to be placed under a bushel, so said Jesus Christ, but upon
the candle stand. The Faith is meant to be publicly confessed and publicly professed unto the
time of death.
Now they avoided heresy. They avoided heretical statements until the last two weeks. Now the
deal is almost done. The betrayal is almost complete and they think we can do nothing about it
anymore, and they have the iron fist of Menzingen held over us.
Fr. Cardozo, a Spanish priest, an Argentinian priest I believe in South America—he preached
against the agreement a month and a half ago and now he can no longer say Mass in a Society
church. Now he is living in a monastery. Now he is in exile. Prepare for the iron fist to come
down again. And for those that do not kowtow, we have been asked to be silent. We don't know
the deal. We don't know the circumstances. We don't know the details. Why not? I'll read you
the details.
When Bishop Fellay was in Austria, he spoke to one of the priests telling him about the deal, the
personal prelature. He told him about the deal. Then, that priest told the faithful and that faithful
put it on the Internet. Here's the deal. Now remember, these are only rumors. So far every other
rumor has turned out to be true! Because Menzingen is telling us nothing, when a rumor comes
out, they verify that it is true. Here's the latest:
What is in the deal of the personal prelature?
Number One: The Pope will decide on who will be bishops of the SSPX, who will replace those
who leave or who do not choose to go along with the agreement. Those bishops will be free to
leave and they will be replaced. Who are those bishops? Bishop Williamson, Bishop de
Galaretta, and Bishop Tissier de Mallerais. They are free to leave and they will be replaced.
Who decides? His name is now Pope Benedict XVI. He became a cardinal in 1977, Joseph
Cardinal Ratzinger and since that time he has devoted his Cardinal life to destroying Catholic
Tradition. He was the one who arranged the deal in 1987 for a small group called Mater Dei,
nine seminarians who left Archbishop Lefebvre to form a small group in Rome and it fell apart;
they were deceived.
Cardinal Ratzinger was the one who promised Dom Gerard, who was the closest friend--a
Benedictine monk and the closest friend of Archbishop Lefebvre--to betray Archbishop Lefebvre
in 1988 and not go along with the consecrations, and he told Dom Gerard, 'You want me to visit
your monastery? I will make you an abbot but you have to come to Rome and you, Dom Gerard,
have to concelebrate the New Mass with the pope and I'll be there watching you to make sure you
really concelebrate.' Dom Gerard agreed because he wanted to be an abbot. He died with his
abbot's mitre three years ago. What was the price? How much did it cost? Who was the one
who arranged the betrayal? Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger.
In 1989 or 1990, Monsignor Gilles Wach comes to Rome. 'I want to start a Traditional Institute
which we will call the Institute of Christ the King.' Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger tells him: 'You
can start your Institute AFTER you concelebrate a New Mass with me. Let me see you
concelebrate the New Mass, then I'll sign your agreement; I'll make you approved.'
That same year, Bishop Zanic comes from Yugoslavia. He visits Rome. He visits Cardinal
Ratzinger and he says, 'Cardinal Ratzinger, you are the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith and I am the Bishop of Medjugorje in Yugoslavia; and in Medjugorje, they are liars.
In Medjugorje they are enemies of God. In Medjugorje, the priests are sleeping with nuns. In
Medjugorje, this is a fake miracle and people are coming from all over the world and I have
condemned it but they won't listen to me. Can you please make a public proclamation from
Rome condemning Medjugorje?' and do you know what Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger said?
'Zanic, you take care of it. There are too many friends of Medjugorje here. I will not condemn it
but I agree with you.' His name was Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger.
In the year 2000, the lie of releasing the Third Secret of Fatima. Cardinal Bertone makes the
announcement and lies to the world and tells them: 'We are releasing the Third Secret' when they
knew it was a lie. Who was sitting next to him? Who was in charge? Who was the man in
charge? His name was Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith. He let Bertone do the dirty talking but he was the one in charge and he sat there
while Bertone spoke a lie.
Who is the most responsible man in the Catholic Church for suppressing the Secret of Fatima?
He used to be called Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger; he now goes by Pope Benedict XVI. He will be
the one to choose our new bishops.
Number 2: No new structures are allowed to be erected without the approval of the diocesan
bishops. Do you think Bishop Carpalia will approve of our new church that we want to build
down at the bottom of the hill? Do you think the new bishop will approve of our new church at
the bottom of the hill? 'No new structures without the permission of the diocesan bishops.' That
is the DEATH of the growth of Tradition.
Number 3: (It gets better. Be patient.) 'Any buildings less than three years old must be closed
down. Any buildings older than three years old may remain up and running.'
I was the pastor in Denver, Colorado, and we built a church there, a large church called St.
Isidore's. It was completed in 2001. That's more than three years ago, so the building can be
saved but it became a priory only three years ago and the priory building, which is on a different
property, was donated to the Society a year and a half ago. Will the priests in the Denver priory
have to leave their priory? And what about Davao? What about Gensan? What about all of
Mindanao? All of Leyte? All of Bohol and Cebu? Are we really here, canonically speaking?
The Society of Saint Pius X doesn't own any property in these areas, except for the ones at the
bottom of the hill, but that's less than three years and there is no church there.
We own only property in Manila and in Iloilo and in Bacolod. So maybe the Society is only in
Manila, Iloilo, and Bacolod and maybe we're not canonically here! So maybe we have to ask
permission to keep saying Mass in Gensan, to go and visit the stranded Faithful in Zamboanga.
And now we gotta know, 'Can I go and bring Jesus Christ to the souls in need? PLEASE give me
permission!' 'I'm so sorry, but the bishop said, 'You can go to hell.' 'I'm so sorry!'' or 'I'm so
happy! The bishop allowed me to be a Catholic priest.' You should also be happy because the
bishop allowed you to be Catholic!
As we mentioned a couple of months ago, when you get married you come before the priest and
you kneel down in front of the altar and you say, "I do" in front of the priest and in front of the
altar and you are married until death do you part. You don't come back to Father seven years
later, "Father, can I still be married?" "It's done! It's finished!" Live a miserable life until you
die! You can't change it.
So likewise, when we are baptized, we're Catholic and no pope can take away my Catholic Faith
and no bishop can take away my Catholic Faith and no priest can take away my Catholic Faith, and no king and no magistrate and no authority can take away my Catholic Faith. But now, we
gotta ask permission to be Catholic.
On June 13, 1988, Archbishop Lefebvre gave a talk to the four bishops. One of them was then
Bishop Bernard Fellay and at the end of his talk, which was recorded, he said, "The saints and the
martyrs always had to choose between Faith and authority. They chose Faith over authority."
That was in 1988.
In 2012, Bishop Fellay says, "You three bishops make a dialectic between truth and Faith on the
one side and authority on the other and this is against the spirit of the priesthood." In other
words, authority can never be against Faith; and if there seems to be a conflict between authority
and Faith, you must obey the authority. That is exactly the opposite of what Archbishop Lefebvre
said to the four bishops elect. Did he forget what the Archbishop told him 24 years ago?
And now the errors. The warning was from many priests and from the three bishops: 'Bishop
Fellay, do not go to bed with the Modernists because when you lie down with dogs you get up
with fleas. If we make a deal with Rome, we will enter into the Roman mystery and we will
become Modernists. Modernists will not become Catholics.'
It has already happened. On May 11, 2012, CNS (Catholic News Service) visited Menzigen,
Switzerland. Many priests have tried calling there but they don't answer the phone. The priests
in Mexico who are completely against this foolish agreement have tried to call Menzingen; they've
tried to get a message through to Menzingen; but they're not available. They're not available. But
they WERE available for the Novus Ordo Catholic News Service and they had lots of time to talk
to Bishop Fellay. The video cameras came in and the bright lights for one of the main outlets of
communication of heresy in the United States, and the Catholic News Service asked Bishop
Fellay some questions:
'What do you think about the SSPX versus Rome? Is there a fight between the SSPX and Rome?'
and Bishop Fellay said, 'No. There's no battle between the SSPX and Rome. That's not the right
way to look at it. It's rather that there are some bad men in positions of authority.'
'What about the Council? You SSPX people are always against the Council of Vatican II. What
about the Council?' And Bishop Fellay said these words, "We learned from the doctrinal
discussions that what we would have before condemned as an error of the Council was in fact not
an error of the Council but only an error of the common interpretation of the Council."
Let's go over that again. 'There is nothing wrong with the Council. The only problem is that of
abuses and the bad interpretation of the Council.' This has been the line of the liberal Novus
Ordo for the last 50 years.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1965 wrote a book called, I Accuse the Council. Not I Accuse
Those People That Have a Bad Interpretation of the Council. Not I Accuse the Misunderstanding
of the Council. I Accuse the Council. The Council teaches error. The Council teaches heresy,
particularly the errors of Religious Liberty and Ecumenism but Bishop Fellay learned from the
doctrinal talks that what we have taught over the last 40 years is incorrect. He has already
converted. He says he's going to go in to convert the Modernists but he's already speaking
Modernist language.
And then the CNS reporter asked him: 'What about Religious Liberty? We know you SSPX guys.
You don't like Religious Liberty. So Bishop Fellay, tell us about Religious Liberty and the
Council.'
And Bishop Fellay said, "The Religious Liberty as it is defined in the Council is a very, very
limited liberty." "It's very limited."
If you go to Mong Hing Teochew you get unlimited rice. If you go to a regular restaurant, you
get limited rice and Bishop Fellay says the liberty spoken of in the Council is very limited.
Religious Liberty as it is spoken of in Vatican Council II is not limited. It's heretical! It's wrong!
It's against the 2000-years' teaching of our Church. It leads to the damnation of souls and has led
to it down the last 50 years; and what are the effects of this false idea that a man has a right to
believe what is wrong is that millions of souls have left the Church.
I just picked up three Protestant ministers (I didn't know they were ministers at the time but there
were three guys at the side of the road in Bohol when I was dropping off Fr. Tim so I picked them
up.) They wanted to go into town and I brought them into town. It turned out they were three
Protestant ministers. They're in Hong Kong and they are very happy with their ecumenical
relations with the Catholic Church in Hong Kong.
Ecumenism and the false Religious Liberty are alive and well and Bishop Fellay says, "It is
limited" whereas we used to say it's heretical! "Limited" means you don't get to eat as much.
"Heretical" means it's poison! He is now speaking error publicly and the whole world can see it.
You can Google it and YouTube. The articles are available and it's on YouTube--Catholic News
Service interviewing the Superior General of the Society of Saint Pius X.
And then they ask him: 'Do you think that Vatican Council II is really a part of the great
Tradition of the Church?' and he said, "I hope so." A bishop of the Church says, "I hope so."
This Council is known well and even the men who promote the Council, they even admit that this
Council is totally different than all the other Councils. This Council is not part of the great
Tradition of the Church. This Council is other. This Council teaches other than what was taught
before and Bishop Fellay says, 'Rome is changing. Rome is converting.'
Is Pope Benedict XVI converting? If he's converted, why is he worshiping to Mecca a few
months ago?--praying and bowing in the Muslim form of prayer to Mecca? John Paul II never
did that! Why is Pope Benedict XVI telling the Muslims that their religion has so much to offer
to us Catholics and our religion? Why is he saying to the Jews that they don't need to become a
follower of Jesus Christ in order to go to Heaven? He is teaching the same heresies and the same
Modernism that he has always taught, only he's an expert in subtle words. He knows the right
buttons to push. He knows the right words to say to deceive Traditional Catholics, such words as
"never abrogated."
Now Bishop Fellay is telling us we don't have to change anything. We don't have to give in
anything. We're gonna be able to walk in without any changes but Rome is saying you gotta
accept Vatican II.
Now we have the Doctrinal Preamble. Finally, the bishops got their hands on the Doctrinal
Preamble in the last couple of days, that secret Doctrinal Preamble. Ambiguities. Foolishness.
But let me give the example we gave a couple of weeks ago in Bohol: It was still before the
Ascension, so it was the Paschal candle that was there. So we will give the example of this light.
Now let us suppose I love light bulbs. I love light bulbs. And you HATE light bulbs. You hate
light bulbs. You hate light bulbs. I love light bulbs, so we don't get along because you have
different ideas about light bulbs. Now we decide that we need to become friends, so therefore I
write up a document: "I declare that WE love light bulbs." And you say, "No! because I hate
light bulbs." So you write up an agreement and your agreement says, "We hate light bulbs" and I
say, "No! because I like light bulbs." We got a problem.
So then a wise man comes and he says, "I can make you friends! We will make another
agreement which is, 'You and I are near light bulbs. I agree that I am near a light bulb and you
agree that you are near a light bulb so let's be friends!' Did anything change? Do you like light
bulbs? No. You still hate them. Do I hate light bulbs? No. I still like them. But we made an
agreement. We had a Doctrinal Preamble which is called QUACK! QUACK! Meaningless
garbage! And the meaningless garbage says, 'we're both next to light bulbs.'
So now, we're gonna make a Doctrinal Preamble with Rome. Rome believes in Modernism.
Rome hates the Catholic Faith. Rome is living the prophecy of Mary and the Blessed Virgin
Mary said, "Rome will lose the Faith" and if we unite with Rome we also lose the Faith. Mary
knows more about Rome than Menzingen. The Blessed Virgin Mary, our Holy Mother Mary, said
at Quito, Ecuador 400 years ago that at the end of the 20th century the priests will lose their
compass--they will lose the Divine compass, and the Church will attack the seven sacraments and
they will abuse and destroy all seven of them, and the priests will not know what it means to be a
priest of God, and there will be a great loss of Faith. That's what the Blessed Virgin Mary said
400 years ago. She knew more back then than Menzingen knows today. Mary knows better! And
in 1846, the Blessed Virgin Mary said, "In the 20th century, Rome will lose the Faith and it will
be the seat of the Anti-Christ." She knows better than Menzingen.
According to Menzingen, it is getting better now. According to the Blessed Virgin Mary, it
CANNOT get better until Russia is consecrated to the Immaculate Heart. Russia has not been
consecrated; therefore, things are NOT better; and if Bishop Fellay and the office help think
things are better, they think differently than our Holy Mother. We will stick with our Holy
Mother, and the Blessed Virgin Mary told the people of Ecuador and the entire world. She said
the same thing at La Salette. She said the same thing at Fatima and again at Akita, Japan most
recently in 1973. Mary said, "When the devil has had his greatest conquest, when it is the darkest
hour, when it seems as though the kingdom of hell is about to conquer, and the kingdom of
Heaven is about to completely collapse, THIS will be My hour. This will be My hour, the hour of
Mary. This will be the hour that I will show in a most magnificent way My power and crush the
devil."
So what do we followers of Mary believe? We followers of Mary believe that things are going to
continue to get worse until SHE fixes it; and therefore, as the world gets worse, we have a double
heart: One part of our heart is sorrowful because of the number of souls that are being lost but
another part of our heart is filled with confidence and filled with great joy because as things get
worse, it means we're getting closer to the Marian victory.
The natural method that is the temptation of adultery is that being given to Menzingen right now:
'Go inside of Rome. Mix with the Modernists. You'll be able to be a good influence, you holy
SSPX priests. You wonderful SSPX priests! You're gonna come in and your halo is gonna glow
to the Modernists.' I'm gonna walk in and, "Oh! He's SO holy! I don't think I'm gonna be a
Modernist anymore! I feel so guilty about being a Modernist!" It isn't going to work.
I was speaking with a priest, a classmate of mine in Mexico, a very gentle, a very kind-hearted, a
very soft-spoken priest. He told me, "Is Menzingen trying to take the truth out of the mouth of the
prophets?" A prophet is meant to speak the truth, and how can we be a prophet if the truth is
taken out of our mouths?
Father Iscara, a professor at St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary, SSPX, in early May presented a
document for all of us to read on the "Economy of Silence"; that the way that St. Basil
condemned the error of the Arians was by hugging them more often, by being nicer to the Arians.
It's a policy of Hug the Heretic and He'll Be Better—that St. Basil didn't use offensive language.
He didn't use the clear, Catholic terminology because it would offend the Arians and therefore he
found a nice way of saying the truth that wouldn't offend the Arians. Try that method with
Jeremiah, the prophet. Did Jesus Christ try that method?
Our Lord Jesus Christ when He was in front of the Pharisees said, "You brood of vipers!" When
He was in front of Caiphas on Good Friday morning and He was about to be sent to death, He
told Caiphas, "Today I go to be crucified but behold! The day will come when you, Caiphas,
shall see the Son of Man in great power and majesty" [Jesus Christ speaking of Himself]. You,
Caiphas, will see the Son of Man coming in great power and majesty and He shall judge you."
This is going to happen at the end of the world.
The prophet must speak the truth and must condemn the errors and hugging heretics does not
make them into saints! We must condemn the errors.
And now another Modernist comes forth. His name is Fr. Celier. He is being brought before the
English-speaking world for the first time. You can find him on the SSPX.org web site. Fr. Celier
is a priest ordained by Archbishop Lefebvre in 1986, an SSPX priest. In 2007 he wrote a book
and in this book he talks about the union between the New Mass and the Old and that we could
have some kind of hybrid Mass by which the New and the Old could somehow mutually enrich
each other. When he tried to sell this book in France, the French Traditional Catholics about
killed him so he had to be put on the back burner until May of 2012. Now, Bishop Fellay has put
him forward again. Only this time, Fr. Celier is teaching us the proper interpretation of the
teaching of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
See, we all know Archbishop Lefebvre said No to NeoModernist Rome. We know Archbishop
Lefebvre said 'Have nothing to do with the Novus Ordo heresy.' We know that he stood firmly
and unequivocally for the truth against all odds. 'But you know what? Let's go back and look at
it again' says Fr. Celier. 'Let us remember that he was speaking in specific times according to
practical circumstances that were prevalent at that time in 1975, in 1988.' You know what that's called? The heresy of Modernism.
What do the Modernists teach? The Modernists teach that the Council of Trent was wonderful in
1545. Vatican Council I was wonderful in 1870. They were the right medicine for the Church at
that time. But in the 1990s and in the 2000s, they no longer apply. Now, we need a new
doctrine. We need a new Council. We need a new way of looking at things. Modernists believe
that truth changes with history just like evolution of species. And so now, Fr. Celier, a priest of
the Society of Saint Pius X, the Society that condemned Modernism, is going to use Modernism
in order to reinterpret Archbishop Lefebvre.
And now come the re-education classes. In October of 2012, there's going to be a meeting in
Kansas City in the US at the headquarters of the SSPX and they're going to talk about the papacy.
There's a big banner with a smiling Pope Benedict XVI. St. Pius X's picture cannot be found.
We're gonna learn about papal authority, or we're gonna re-learn. We're gonna learn about the
danger of Sedevacantism. We're going to learn about the importance of 'obedience, obedience,
obedience! Don't stand for the Faith over obedience!'
As of May of 2012, many, many priests of the Society of Saint Pius X worry and are firmly
against this agreement; but they are also afraid because of the iron fist of Menzingen that has
already crushed some. I go to America next week. I come back in theory July 5th. Will I survive
the Modernists? This may be the summer of the divorce.
And they tried to keep it a secret until the last moment. Father Tim pointed out in a sermon last
week about adultery, adultery—a sin against the family. Adultery occurs when a man is with a
woman that is not his wife, but adultery can also happen to a priest. A priest is a man of truth
who is a follower of THE TRUTH, Who is Jesus Christ, and we are said to be "another Christ"
which means we are meant to be another walking Truth. Who sees a priest should see the Truth.
Who hears the words of a priest should hear the words of Christ and the words of Christ are the
words of the Truth because He said, "I AM THE TRUTH"; not "I am the obedience"; not "I am
the authority"; "I AM THE TRUTH."
How does adultery happen to a priest? Fr. Tim pointed out last week that adultery happens to a
priest when truth in the mind of the priest is co-habitating and mingling with error in the mind of
the same priest. If a man lives with a woman, we call that living in sin. A priest lives in sin when
he has the truth in one side of his mind and error and heresy on the other. We cannot sleep with
the Modernists! We cannot be united with the Modernists because if we are united with the
Modernists, the truth side will be destroyed by the lying side.
What happens when a man sleeps with a woman who is not his wife? First of all, there are no
legitimate children. So likewise, when a priest mixes truth with lies he can have no legitimate
children of Faith. The Faith is dead! And furthermore, if there ARE children, they will be
bastards.
The New Mass is a bastard Mass. The new priests are bastard priests. Archbishop Lefebvre, and
remember, it was back in the old days, you must remember the circumstances—if you believe in
Modernism remember the circumstances—but if you're a Catholic only remember the truth. And
the truth is Archbishop Lefebvre said, "The New Mass is a bastard Mass!" Why did he say it was
a bastard Mass? Because it is a Mass in which a Catholic priest celebrates Protestant rites.
Catholic/Protestant co-habitating bastards. Adultery.
What is going to happen? Maybe we are going to have to go back to the catacombs again. Many
priests are afraid. Maybe we won't be able to come back to our rectories. Maybe we will be
driven out to the streets. There are many against in May of 2012, but when the ax falls, how
many will stay against?
In 1965, 250 bishops at the end of the Council said, "We will stand firm against the Council!"
Two hundred and fifty bishops. In 1969, four years later, one of them founded a seminary, one
out of 250. Later on, a second one stayed faithful in his diocese. Two out of 250, but in 1965,
they were all united.
The SSPX is now, for the first time in history, in a practical state of division. Even if Bishop
Fellay doesn't sign on the dotted line, even if the pope doesn't come through with a miracle today
he will come through with it tomorrow or next week. From now on, there's going to be liberal
priests in the Society and there's going to be priests faithful to Archbishop Lefebvre. Up until this
day, the smart priests and the stupid priests, young and old, lazy and hardworking—all of them
believed the same Faith! But now, you will find two directions.
Pope Benedict XVI is the master of disaster. He has been destroying and dividing Tradition for
the last 20, 30 years. Now, he has Bishop Fellay in a diabolical disorientation. He has the bishop
believing that the new friends in Rome are gonna help him, and he's gonna help them become
good Catholics. He doesn't need his old friends anymore. He doesn't need the three bishops
anymore. And you will see a purge, baring a miracle, you will see a purge. 'This priest was
expelled from the Society because he's disobedient, that one because he's crazy, this one—you
know—we can't tell you—you don't want to know.'
We must stand firm for the Faith. Many souls are in grave jeopardy today because Bishop Fellay
has decided to play with fire and smile, because he's got the grace of state. FAITH is greater than
the grace of state! FAITH IS FIRST. And the father of the family does not have the right to
jeopardize his family. He doesn't have the right to tear it apart. He doesn't have the right to
compromise. For what? What promises have they made him? They've lied to the others.
They've destroyed the others.
You know that Fr. Laguerie, the Superior of the Good Shepherd Institute which was started in
2006—he called Fr. de Cacqueray a month ago. Fr. de Cacqueray is a French priest who came
here. Back in 2006, Fr. Laguerie was in his church and he wasn't going to leave it. Fr. de
Cacqueray came in by himself. He walked up the center isle with 250 people who were all
behind Fr. Laguerie. He stood in front of all the people and he said, 'Fr. Laguerie, get out of this
church! This is a SSPX church. You're not following our rules. Get out! And you people: Get
out!' Fr. Laguerie said, 'I am happy that you came to me like a man and you spoke to me like a
man and you condemned me like a man. I go out' and he went out. Six years later, Fr. Laguerie
calls up Fr. de Cacqueray and says, 'Father, remember me? I'm the priest you threw out in the
correct way you should have done it. I am telling you, don't make a deal with Rome! I did! We
made a deal six years ago and now they're crushing us! You saw the document of March 23rd
where Cardinal Pozzo, the clown, commands us to live according to the spirit of Summorum
Pontificum; that we have to accept the New Mass; that we have to incorporate the Catechism of
the Catholic Church into our seminary; that we have to teach Modernism and crap in our
seminary. We are trapped! But they told us six years ago, 'No conditions.' I am calling you
because of the respect I have for you because you treated me like a man, so I'm telling you' so Fr.
de Cacqueray passed on the word to Bishop Fellay. He's not turning back.
Also, the last part of this, according to Bishop Fellay--the General Chapter which is going to meet
in July will not be a meeting to discuss an acceptance of the agreement because it is already
accepted, but simply to learn what the new statutes will be under the new agreement with Rome.
We've got to go back to re-education classes. I'm not going to those classes. The Faith does not
need re-education.
This may be my last Sunday in Davao. We do not know what will happen. The iron fist is
above. Fear is below, but the truth is larger than both. Many of the faithful are afraid all over the
world.
And lastly, let us consider Moses. After 40 days on the mountain; in fact, it was 48 days because
he went up to the top of the mountain and prayed for 8 days and then he went to the higher part of
the mountain and remained for 40 days, so in fact it was 48 days. At the end of the 40 days, he
came down to the middle of the mountain where Joshua was waiting and they began to walk
down that mountain and they heard noise like this in the background. And Joshua said to Moses,
'Moses, let us hurry to the camp because I hear the sound of battle! I hear the sound of war down
in the Jewish camp!' Moses said, 'Don't hurry. It's not the sound of war, Joshua. It's not the
sound of battle, Joshua. It is the sound of laughter. It is the sound of the minstrels playing. It is
the sound of my people Israel worshipping a golden calf, a golden calf that was made by my own
brother, Aaron, during the time that I was receiving the Commandments and all the prescriptions
of the Old Law from God. While I was talking with God over the last 40 days, they were talking
to the devil! Joshua, you do not hear the sound of battle.'
Now this is what we think: Menzingen is telling us, 'We're gonna go in and fight! We're gonna go
in and do battle! We're gonna go in and fight the Modernists.' No, they're not. They're gonna go
in and drink with Modernists. They're gonna go in and sing songs with Modernists. They're
gonna go in and pray with Modernists. They're gonna go in and worship the golden calf.
Moses continued down the mountain. When he arrived at the bottom, they were all surprised to
see him and they were afraid, and they were right to be afraid. It was a bad day to meet Moses.
Moses came down that mountain and he said, 'These are the Commandments I received from
God. Here is their value in front of you' and he took those Commandments and he threw them on
the ground and they broke into pieces. And then he said these words: 'Who is on the Lord's
side?' No argument. No theological discussion with the Jews. No telling the Jews all the
beautiful things that happened on top of the mountain. He simply said, 'Who is on the Lord's
side? Whoever is on the Lord's side, come over here. Whoever is not, stand over there' and they
divided. Still no theological discussions. Moses then pulled out a sword and he said, 'Those of
you who are on the Lord's side, kill every one of them! Leave not one alive!' and 40,000 were
killed on that day. It was a bloody day.
We are at a time in which arguments have already been made. They already know the tune of the
Modernists. They already know the tricks and the Modernists say, "Obedience over Faith!"
We've heard those words before. Argument, though it must occasionally be done, is not the
answer. Now we must decide who is on the Lord's side.
There are two excommunicated bishops who remain excommunicated and they are on the Lord's
side. One of them is Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. He's on the Lord's side. The other is Bishop
de Castro Mayer. He's on the Lord's side, and they're both excommunicated from the
NeoModernist Church. How we have been afraid of excommunication! We should rather be
afraid of offending God, not of excommunication.
And lastly, we'll read from a letter—it takes a while to get to the bottom of it here—from English
Catholics of the Society of Saint Pius X, an open letter to Bishop Fellay. We'll read here only the
conclusion, a letter saying that we must stand for Tradition.
"Bishop Fellay, which Bishop Fellay do we listen to? The one that said in 1999 that the Council
is erroneous and not just the hermeneutics of the Council, or the one in 2012 that says there's
nothing wrong with the Council, only the hermeneutics? Bishop Fellay in 1999 said, 'The
Council is wrong.' Bishop Fellay in 2012 says, 'The Council is right.' Which Bishop Fellay do
we listen to? We will listen to the one that was faithful to Archbishop Lefebvre and Catholic
Tradition. Here is the conclusion of this long article which we will not read; you can get it off the
Internet:
"It is our fervent hope [these English Catholics, many who have signed and sent this letter on
May 19th] it is our fervent hope that the future of the SSPX and the future of Tradition are, as in
the days past, one and the same thing. It is our hope that the SSPX continues to be the same as
Tradition. Whatever may be the case, however, we will do all within our power to believe and
spread the truth, to denounce error and in so doing to remain faithful to Our Lord and His
Church, to Tradition and the legacy of Archbishop Lefebvre whatever the cost and whether Your
Excellency chooses to abandon us or to remain with us. St. Pius X, ora pro nobis."
As Bishop Williamson used to say many times, the SSPX is a pilot light. It carries the light of
Faith. If it should ever abandon that light, then we must abandon the SSPX. Archbishop
Lefebvre used to say, "I teach you the truth. Follow it as long as I teach it. But if the day comes
that I don't teach it anymore, then abandon me for we must be followers of the truth, followers of
the Faith."
Now let us pray for a miracle and the miracle is that enough priests and enough faithful stand up
and preserve the legacy of the Society of Saint Pius X which is to continue to stand firm for the
Faith, and that Bishop Fellay realizes and wakes up from his stupor and realizes that he is being
deceived by the devil and comes back to the firm teaching of the truth, to the firm condemnation
of errors and strengthens us in that truth and continues to condemn the errors and stays faithful to
the legacy of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the Society of Saint Pius X, and what is necessary for
the continuation of our Holy Church: THE FAITH! THE FAITH!
Viva Cristo Rey!