Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2018 4:35:19 GMT
We must seek the truth not want we want to hear. It is what God wants not what we are prepared to give him
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2018 4:42:25 GMT
We live in times when there are not enough priests to give us mass but we must make sure that the priest is complely true to Catholic Doctrine.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2018 0:46:38 GMT
On the other hand, why doesn't this forum promote Fr. Rafael, O.S.B. He is faithful to Archbishop Lefebvre, is not associated with the false resistance, and denounces Ambrose Moran. We have to stop with this cult-like mentality and stand for the truth. Fr. Pfeiffer needs to be opposed, especially on the Ambrose Moran issue. Which other Priests do you believe are faithful to Archbishop Lefebvre? Do Fr. Chazal, Fr. Picot, Fr. Suneel, etc. belong on that list? From their point of view, they agree with your position, i.e. oppose Archbishop Moran. Have you created a list on who should and should not be in the true and false resistance. In your list, has Fr. Pfeiffer joined the ranks of the false resistance Priests? Fr. Ruiz is another priest being faithful to Archbishop Lefebvre. Fr. Chazal et al are problematic because they have made excuses one way or another for Bishop Williamson regarding his comments on the New Mass. This is not acceptable. Being against active attendance at the New Mass is a core principle in our fight for Catholic Tradition. I have not created a list nor will I. Fr. Pfeiffer, if he proceeds with Ambrose Moran, will have founded a sect at the time the first seminarian is made a deacon. In the meantime, we must oppose him on principle and the best way to do that is to refuse to attend his Masses.
|
|
nick
New Member
Posts: 7
|
Post by nick on Nov 19, 2018 3:42:46 GMT
Which other Priests do you believe are faithful to Archbishop Lefebvre? Do Fr. Chazal, Fr. Picot, Fr. Suneel, etc. belong on that list? From their point of view, they agree with your position, i.e. oppose Archbishop Moran. Have you created a list on who should and should not be in the true and false resistance. In your list, has Fr. Pfeiffer joined the ranks of the false resistance Priests? Fr. Ruiz is another priest being faithful to Archbishop Lefebvre. Fr. Chazal et al are problematic because they have made excuses one way or another for Bishop Williamson regarding his comments on the New Mass. This is not acceptable. Being against active attendance at the New Mass is a core principle in our fight for Catholic Tradition. I have not created a list nor will I. Fr. Pfeiffer, if he proceeds with Ambrose Moran, will have founded a sect at the time the first seminarian is made a deacon. In the meantime, we must oppose him on principle and the best way to do that is to refuse to attend his Masses. If a Priest does something you personally disagree with, should he be charged with founding a sect? Isn't that the same manner of accusation that was passed on to Archbishop Lefebvre by Rome?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2018 12:45:28 GMT
Fr. Ruiz is another priest being faithful to Archbishop Lefebvre. Fr. Chazal et al are problematic because they have made excuses one way or another for Bishop Williamson regarding his comments on the New Mass. This is not acceptable. Being against active attendance at the New Mass is a core principle in our fight for Catholic Tradition. I have not created a list nor will I. Fr. Pfeiffer, if he proceeds with Ambrose Moran, will have founded a sect at the time the first seminarian is made a deacon. In the meantime, we must oppose him on principle and the best way to do that is to refuse to attend his Masses. If a Priest does something you personally disagree with, should he be charged with founding a sect? Isn't that the same manner of accusation that was passed on to Archbishop Lefebvre by Rome? Do you really want to compare the history of Archbishop Lefebvre with that of the fraud called Ambrose Moran? This disagreement I have with Fr. Pfeiffer is not based on anything personal, it is based on facts and questions regarding the legitimacy of Ambrose Moran's story. Ambrose Moran's story is so fantastic that not even Hollywood could come up with such a script.
|
|
nick
New Member
Posts: 7
|
Post by nick on Nov 19, 2018 14:09:41 GMT
If a Priest does something you personally disagree with, should he be charged with founding a sect? Isn't that the same manner of accusation that was passed on to Archbishop Lefebvre by Rome? Do you really want to compare the history of Archbishop Lefebvre with that of the fraud called Ambrose Moran? This disagreement I have with Fr. Pfeiffer is not based on anything personal, it is based on facts and questions regarding the legitimacy of Ambrose Moran's story. Ambrose Moran's story is so fantastic that not even Hollywood could come up with such a script. The history of Archbishop Lefebvre have left us Priests like Fr. Chazal et al. whom you pronounce problematic, and Bp. Fellay et al. who now make deals with Rome. Aren't these also equally worthy Hollywood scripts? Rome has many more interesting Hollywood scripts. Archbishop Ambrose Moran's script has more to do with Cardinal Josyf Slipyj's script, who like Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated Bishops without papal mandate for the preservation of the Church.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 19, 2018 14:29:25 GMT
|
|