Ten Questions to Ask the Priests
Dec 18, 2017 19:50:40 GMT
Post by Admin on Dec 18, 2017 19:50:40 GMT
Do you believe and accept Vatican II : Yes or No.
Do you accept Vatican II as able to be saved if it is interpreted in the traditional understanding? Yes or No. No. It is ambiguous language. The hermeneutic continuity.
Do you accept Bishop Fellay's doctrinal Declaration of April 15th 2012? Yes or No.
Do you accept that the new mass is legitimately promulgated? Yes or No.
Do you admit religious liberty of the council is somehow reconcilable with the Church's magisterium? Yes or No. (B. Fellay said yes - he signed on it) No it is a heresy condemned by the church) Yes or No. B. Fellay said it can.
Do you think it is OK to attend the new mass. Yes or No. ABL said you do not fulfil your suday obliation by attending the NO. It is poisonous to your soul
Do you deny religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality are heresies repeatedly condemned by all the Popes before Vatican II? Yes or No. We do not deny them...they are heresies
Do you think any priest or bishop can be trusted, who claimed to be with the resistance, but give ambiguous answers to above direct questions and fails to make a clear declaration of his position. Yes or No.
Do you agree that it is OK and posits no danger to the faith if one keeps going to the indult moto proprio Mass, or of St. Peter's fraternity Mass, or now the conciliar SSPX Masses? Yes or No. No you cannot agree and it is dangerous to the faith. *
Do you think Archbishop Lefebvre was against reconciliation with modernist Rome, but open to recognition from modernist rome. Refused both. Yes or No. No . The poison is in the text. It is openly ambiguous. The heresies are in the text which means they can be doubly interpreted. It is pure modernism.
Source
Do you accept Vatican II as able to be saved if it is interpreted in the traditional understanding? Yes or No. No. It is ambiguous language. The hermeneutic continuity.
Do you accept Bishop Fellay's doctrinal Declaration of April 15th 2012? Yes or No.
Do you accept that the new mass is legitimately promulgated? Yes or No.
Do you admit religious liberty of the council is somehow reconcilable with the Church's magisterium? Yes or No. (B. Fellay said yes - he signed on it) No it is a heresy condemned by the church) Yes or No. B. Fellay said it can.
Do you think it is OK to attend the new mass. Yes or No. ABL said you do not fulfil your suday obliation by attending the NO. It is poisonous to your soul
Do you deny religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality are heresies repeatedly condemned by all the Popes before Vatican II? Yes or No. We do not deny them...they are heresies
Do you think any priest or bishop can be trusted, who claimed to be with the resistance, but give ambiguous answers to above direct questions and fails to make a clear declaration of his position. Yes or No.
Do you agree that it is OK and posits no danger to the faith if one keeps going to the indult moto proprio Mass, or of St. Peter's fraternity Mass, or now the conciliar SSPX Masses? Yes or No. No you cannot agree and it is dangerous to the faith. *
Do you think Archbishop Lefebvre was against reconciliation with modernist Rome, but open to recognition from modernist rome. Refused both. Yes or No. No . The poison is in the text. It is openly ambiguous. The heresies are in the text which means they can be doubly interpreted. It is pure modernism.
Source