Remy - where is the fraud and where is the deceit?
Fr. Pfeiffer HAS sacramentally associated with Bp. Ambrose by the re-ordination of Fr. Poisson.
Fr. Pfeiffer HAS repeated that he intends to accept Bp. Ambrose even if he is found to be dishonest - I can personally attest to this and I know others on this forum can as well.
Fr. Pfeiffer, in the second conference, referred to and did NOT deny that paperwork and picture(s?) submitted by Bp. Ambrose concerning his association with Cardinal Slipyj were forged.
+++
As for YOUR yet again uncharitableness in calling Fr. Ruiz's letter "sordid" - again watch yourself!
This is Fr. Ruiz's letter, of which there is nothing sordid about it. He simply and kindly warns his fellow priests to not associate with Bp. Ambrose but as you can see it is written in a spirit of true fraternal charity. May we all imitate him in treating with others with whom we do not agree.
Do not start attacking the priests who have long been friends of OLMC. If they do not have all the particulars, a fact of whether they do or not we ALL do not know, that does not earn them censure and ridicule and vitriol if they express prudent caution and reserve.
These priests are all long defenders of tradition in the line of Archbishop Lefebvre. Fr. Cardozo I believe was the very first priest to stand up to Bp. Fellay and tell him he was wrong about the new direction. We do not have the right to castigate them if they advise caution in the setting of doubt. These priests too have no bishop. They have everything to gain if Bp. Ambrose is licit. Their advice and counsel is not irrelevant.
We are not in a cult. We do not function as if anyone who disagrees with us is automatically 'excommunicated' from our little group. That is dangerous. It is what Holy Mother Church teaches us that we cling to. For many there are still doubts that have to be worked through. But this immediate castigation of anyone who doesn't toe the party line is disturbing.
God bless.