Is Fr. Chazal really a Vagabond?

"This news is sad to a fault.

Of course, Father Joseph could have personal reasons to be there: maybe one of his nephews was taking the cassock? or that he hopes that by his presence, he will be able to testify in favor of resistance to rallying?
There may be good subjective reasons and that is why we will not judge the intentions.

What interests us today is the real, objective and concrete testimony given by priests and bishops to the ongoing subversion in the work of the SSPX. And objectively, to come to contests of cassocks in Flavigny, is this a way to testify by ACTS that one does not want to rally to the Rome of François?

So that our readers can better understand the gravity of this action, let's compare it to another one: imagine that the RP Joseph goes next Saturday February 10 to the taking of the cassock at AVRILLE !! [ED. And why haven't they done so already if they are in the "resistance"?]  We do not even dare to imagine the response of the rallyerists within the SSPX.

More deeply, these priests with a good heart, can be sincerely opposed to a rallying, preaching even to their flock fervently ... these priests, I say, make the game of rallying as long as they do not pose ACTS that break with the process.

Because the revolution has NEVER been able to operate without its "right" wing. In the first act of any revolution / subversion, the front-guard party poses ACTS that make things progress, then in a second step, the back-guard party reacts to slow down the revolution a little and wants to give it a more serious framework. So the French revolution will behead the God and the King but Napoleon will reassure Catholics by giving them a certain freedom in a revolutionary framework. Thus the counter-revolutionaries had to stop the fight for lack of resistance.  [ED. Sounds much like Bishop Williamson and his rear-guard conservative approach].

Same thing with the council, the front-guard pose the worst principles and the "conservatives" will then try to curb the evil.

Same with François. This pope needs conservatives and opponents of these advances (marriage, liturgy), so he avoids the hemorrhage of Catholics who do not like the excess of disorder.

It is this DIABOLIC mechanism that we find in the SSPX. The left wing pushes and places the bombs ("practical agreements, canonical standardization etc ...").  The actions of this wing are very concrete and well in step with what was done before 2012.  What will be the role of the "conservatives" of the SSPX?  Save the structure, reassure the faithful that one day it will be better, that it is important not to join the resistance, that it is necessary to wait for a providential leader etc.  In short it is necessary especially to prevent people to leave the framework of the FSSPX, they give themselves as mission to save the current framework but in truth they are only saving this same frame which will then allow the front-guard to continue their work of undermining when these preservatives will be in their turn eliminated (because they will be but they will be do not want to believe it).  This is why the conciliar revolution did not eliminate all the "conservatives" at once.  This is also why Menzingen does not want to refer the most hostile elements to rallying: these are necessary for them as long as the faithful are still a little worried about the current process.

Conservatives are generally reassuring, pious, intelligent and brilliant people.  And that's why the front-guard use them, do not want to put them out of order ... to pick up as many people as possible and reassure the crowd. "See Father Joseph was at Econe, Fatima, Flavigny" ...

Let's pray for these poor "conservatives" to open their eyes to their bad work and to really do penance for their past imprudence. "


translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fresistance.vraiforum.com%2F&langpair=auto|en&hl=en