Fr. Kramer: Sedevacantist, Sedealterist, or Hypocrite?
Jan 23, 2018 1:01:09 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2018 1:01:09 GMT
We have pointed out the duplicit position held by Fr. Kramer regarding his belief of two legitimate popes, in his mind, he holds valid as one position. Yes, two legitimate popes.
First the background.
Provided within Fr. Kramer's Newest Position, he had demonstrated:
Ad nauseam, I receive all of his emails trying to justify his duel positions.
Let's cut to the chase.
Question:
If Fr. Kramer alleges pope Francis is not the pope, not legitimate, never happened, and pope Benedict still is (because of a flawed document, he says) why in Fr. Kramer's conscience is he literally DEFENDING the papacy of pope Francis as a pope, so he could "denounce" him with sedevacantist rhetoric as a heretic pope?
It doesn't make sense does it?
Another question:
If fr. Kramer wants to believe pope Benedict is still the true pope, without having any modernist heresy, does Fr. Kramer visit him? Does he follow all of his teaching? Is the Church crisis gone for him? Does he subject himself to his jurisdiction? Is their a valid ordinary bishop that follows this same sede-alterist position (believing that a different pope exists)? Then shouldn't Fr. Kramer be under in this bishop for his valid jurisdiction?
If the answer is NO to any or all of these questions, them Fr. Kramer would be a hypocrite and twisting catholic teaching into a weave of subjective interpretation.
It's that clear.
Sedevacantism is a fraud; as is believing pope Benedict is still the pope.
First the background.
Provided within Fr. Kramer's Newest Position, he had demonstrated:
- He believed in the Catholic appointment of Pope Francis and said his name in his masses.
- He then stated sedevacantism on Nov. 28, 2013 for 24 hours on his Facebook page relating to Pope Francis not to be the pope out of "heresy", saying, “The conclusion is inescapable: Sede Vacante”. Which validates his belief that pope Francis is the true pope...to then dethrone him in his mind as a "heretic" pope.
- Fr. Kramer then disband that idea the next day to take up the sede-alterist position that another pope, Benedict, is [still] the pope.
- He then days later quickly banded together his former position of sedevacantism again in his belief in pope Francis, simultaneously with pope Benedict, to spend most of his energy defending his sedevacantist position that pope Francis is a heretic pope.
Ad nauseam, I receive all of his emails trying to justify his duel positions.
Let's cut to the chase.
Question:
If Fr. Kramer alleges pope Francis is not the pope, not legitimate, never happened, and pope Benedict still is (because of a flawed document, he says) why in Fr. Kramer's conscience is he literally DEFENDING the papacy of pope Francis as a pope, so he could "denounce" him with sedevacantist rhetoric as a heretic pope?
It doesn't make sense does it?
Another question:
If fr. Kramer wants to believe pope Benedict is still the true pope, without having any modernist heresy, does Fr. Kramer visit him? Does he follow all of his teaching? Is the Church crisis gone for him? Does he subject himself to his jurisdiction? Is their a valid ordinary bishop that follows this same sede-alterist position (believing that a different pope exists)? Then shouldn't Fr. Kramer be under in this bishop for his valid jurisdiction?
If the answer is NO to any or all of these questions, them Fr. Kramer would be a hypocrite and twisting catholic teaching into a weave of subjective interpretation.
It's that clear.
Sedevacantism is a fraud; as is believing pope Benedict is still the pope.