Swiss bishop grants the FSSPX use of Conciliar churches

From the Reconquista blog [via Google translate]:

The lies in politics:

The current President of the French Republic said that " France can not welcome everyone if it wants to welcome well ". The speech seems anti-migrationist, like other statements of former Presidents of the Republic, such as Mr. Chirac who already recognized in 1984 : " The problem is that since 1981, very many immigrants have arrived in France. Given the economic situation, there are too many. So their numbers must decrease. " And on June 19, 1991, he said again: " Our problem is not foreigners, it is overdose." The speeches may therefore seem strong, but in the acts nothing happens, except the opposite of what is said.

This is the hallmark of the modern liberal political spirit: to please a fringe of people (right or left) who will support you because you will speak in their direction and tell them what they want to hear. Did not Mr. Pasqua cynically say that " Promises are binding only on those who receive them "?

But in the acts that guide the common good of the nation, politicians in reality obey the great financial lobbies that have supported and elect them, and the Masonic lodges that hold the entire administration of the country. The weakness of their will does the rest, because saving decisions often require great sacrifices, both from the rulers and their subjects.

Same state of mind in today's religious world:

This is unfortunately the same spirit that we find in the current Superiors of the FSSPX: sometimes strong words of the current Superior General, who believe in a probable return to normal, in fidelity to the Founder. It goes so far as to say that " the present Church is walking on the head ". Father Pagliarani realistically highlights the ecumenical and pluralist spirit of this neo-church and there is nothing wrong with his words:

But a few days after this firm speech, we learn that the SSPX has obtained the right to celebrate its 50th anniversary in a diocesan church. The authorization is given as an " ecumenical act " by Bishop Morerod of Lausanne, Geneva and Friborg. Of course, the term does not come from the SSPX, it comes from the bishop himself, who justifies his gesture as a derogation from the Brotherhood, precisely to the extent that it is not in perfect communion with Rome.

The FSSPX thus returns in this concrete ("practical") way in what it condemns in theory: to teach the truth on an equal footing (even in inferiority) with the conciliar error. By this scandalous fact,the principles of Roman ecumenism. Therefore, the good words of the abbot Pagliarani are worth nothing at all.

Why this radical contradiction between the speech of the Superior General of the SSPX and the actions taken?

It's all the liberal mystery that is based on an incurable contradiction. The spirit of the liberal Catholic could be reduced to the following formula: "The Church must yield to time and circumstances." In [this] specific case, with a "small" concession, we will obtain a beautiful church in Friborg, where we can celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the work of Archbishop Lefebvre.

In principle, it is certain - say the liberal Catholics - that the authority of the Church in matters of Faith and Manners is superior to all the powers of the earth, but in the actual concrete circumstances, it is not appropriate to raise this question not to irritate the spirits. But not to irritate the bishop of Friborg is to enter silently into his game, and that of the pope.

Supported by false principles, liberal Catholics are not afraid to be in constant contradiction with themselves. They proclaim, with their Master Jesus Christ, that no one can serve two masters, but in practice it is what they do: to serve in words the Catholic Church, and in acts the "conciliar" Church.

May God keep us from this double spirit.

Mikaël