"In his November 2019 newsletter Issue #6, he writes the following "OLMC in Kentucky, seems sadly to have joined the ranks of the Fake Resistance on this score, since they promote now, that "the new sacraments are all valid, and cannot be doubted!?" This approval goes for the new rite of ordinations and consecration of bishops as well."
Does anyone know where in Fr. Pfeiffer's video he says that?
Seriously?? Fr. Hewko's got nothing better to do so he should be going back reviewing old Angelus articles eh? Who died and made these characters Fr. Hewko's boss?
This letter is a real joke.
They are desperate going back in time searching for articles to compare one priest's words with another like apples and oranges. They live so close, yet they have to bring it to the public circus to grab those who hate or know less than they do of what ABL stated. They certainly want to waste Fr. Hewko's time telling him what to do and what Fr. Hewko is responsible for , like old Angelus articles? Give me a break. They need to go and read a book written by ABL, instead of showing the world how crazy they are.
I am wondering where the best sources are regarding this issue of grace or no grace in the Novus Ordo? Is there a specific book by ABL that most covers this issue? How about another theologian who makes an extensive presentation of church history and teaching regarding the said issue of grace concerning false councils and false priests and bishops in error. Am I just not understanding what grace is as the Church defines it, and how it is recognized as being present or not present?
Perterd: I am wondering why I did not get a response to some questions I had regarding the Fr. Pfeiffer and Fr. Hewko split? Could it be Fr. Hewko is in error with respect to understanding what Fr. Pfeiffer is really saying in his video.
It could very well be we are tired of this old information being discussed for over a year now and have no desire or time to look up what has been answered over and over already. Who has time to look up for you all the answers to your questions that have already been answered?
as for this question and other questions:
I am wondering where the best sources are regarding this issue of grace or no grace in the Novus Ordo?
Answer: The best source would be the catechism.
Another good source for answers to your questions would be to listen to Fr. Hewko's sermons of which you can hear it from him directly.
Who here has time to go back and read over a year's worth of posts on this subject and to listen to all the sermons as well to give answers to you? For all of us who have stayed on top of this for nearly 2 years now we already get it. I for one, see this battle as a waste of time at this point, and simply want to move forward to focus on the big battle and not get distracted with this old information. The devil is tricky and likes to distract from what is important. I'm not saying this wasn't important a year ago when decisions had to be made. We're past that now. If you missed it then I suggest you call Fr. Hewko and stop interpreting what he said from bits and pieces of things you read on the forum. He can explain up to date what he said, and why
At 33:10 Fr. Pfeiffer says, " He is the true pope, they are true bishops, they are true priests".
Not sure if this is the information you are looking for.
Fr. Pfeiffer is trying to sell the idea that the Novus Ordo priests, bishops are valid. Then why did the SSPX do reordinations? Why did ABL do reordinations? According to Fr. Pfeiffer, they are all priests and bishops.
1990 - Letter of Archbishop Lefebvre to Bishop de Castro Mayer:
...because priests and faithful have a strict right to have shepherds who profess the Catholic Faith in its entirety, essential for the salvation of their souls, and to have priests who are true Catholic priests. Secondly, because the Conciliar Church...