True Agenda of the WHO: New World Order Modeled After China
May 13, 2020 15:55:28 GMT
Post by Admin on May 13, 2020 15:55:28 GMT
The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China
The WHO has been handling the COVID-19 outbreak in a specific matter. It went from downplaying the virus and lobbying against travel bans from China to pushing for the constant lockdown of the world and its economy. There’s a method behind the madness: The WHO is using the pandemic to move towards a New World Order that is modeled after China’s oppressive regime.
Since the outbreak of COVID-19 outside of China, the World Health Organization (WHO) has taken a prominent role in the handling of the pandemic on a global level. The unquestioned power and influence of this organization created by the United Nations lead most governments around the world to shape their policies and pandemic response according to the WHO’s data and guidelines. In other words, nations enabled a global (and non-democratic) entity to dictate decisions that are taken on a national and local level.
The result of this direct pipeline between the WHO and national governments has been profound and far-reaching. Fueled by apocalyptic models and projections, governments were urged to confine their entire population while shutting down their entire economies for several months. The devasting consequences of this global lockdown are still difficult to quantify. However, a prediction made in my article COVID-19 Lockdown: A Global Human Experiment quickly came to fruition: Billions of dollars were funneled from the working class towards the elite.
A Fast Company headline about the financial elite profiting from the pandemic.
So why is the WHO giving orders to nations and their democratically elected governments? Is it due to its proven track record and educated advice? Clearly not. Because the organization’s response to the pandemic at its earliest and most critical stages was nothing less than disastrous. Some might argue that it was even deliberate.
On January 14th, the WHO claimed that there was no human-to-human transmission – citing Chinese sources.
On February 4th, WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus spoke against travel restrictions on China, saying such measures could cause “fear and stigma”. He added that there “no reason for panic and fear”, he said.
Since most world governments blindly followed the WHO’s recommendations, air travel from China continued for weeks and allowed the spread of the virus across the world. And, when some countries nevertheless moved forward to stop travel from China, the WHO actively lobbied against it.
The WHO directly lobbied against banning travel to countries, including China.
A statement released as late as February 29, argued against travel bans because they “may disrupt businesses, and may have negative social and economic effects on the affected countries”.
“WHO continues to advise against the application of travel or trade restrictions to countries experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks,” the statement said.
“In general, evidence shows that restricting the movement of people and goods during public health emergencies is ineffective in most situations and may divert resources from other interventions.”
Academic research by the University of Southampton has revealed up to 95 percent of deaths would not have happened if the WHO acted earlier.
A statement released as late as February 29, argued against travel bans because they “may disrupt businesses, and may have negative social and economic effects on the affected countries”.
“WHO continues to advise against the application of travel or trade restrictions to countries experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks,” the statement said.
“In general, evidence shows that restricting the movement of people and goods during public health emergencies is ineffective in most situations and may divert resources from other interventions.”
Academic research by the University of Southampton has revealed up to 95 percent of deaths would not have happened if the WHO acted earlier.
The last sentence is particularly damning: 95% of deaths could have been avoided if the WHO did not go against travel bans from China. Considering the fact the WHO actively worked against the single most important measure to stop the spread of the virus, why is it still shaping government policies? Because it is linked to the global elite.
Despite spreading information that was outright false and dangerous, the WHO remains unquestionably influential across the world. On April 18th, the organization showcased its immense power by broadcasting Together At Home, a massive media event that had countless celebrities and powerful people praise the WHO and the elite entities behind it.
The WHO is also heavily invested in controlling the flow of information regarding the virus.
A headline from The Verdict.
Speaking on CNN’s Reliable Sources, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki stated that the streaming platform would be “removing information that is problematic” and that would include “anything that is medically unsubstantiated”. She added:
“So people saying ‘take vitamin C; take turmeric, we’ll cure you’, those are the examples of things that would be a violation of our policy. Anything that would go against World Health Organisation recommendations would be a violation of our policy.”
Why? Because the WHO is banking on a single, universal solution: A Vaccine.
To fully understand the mindset behind the WHO, we must look at the funding behind the WHO.
Two of the five biggest funders of the WHO are the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Gavi Alliance. As seen in the article Bill Gates is Calling for a Digital ID to Idenfity Who is Vaccinated, these two organizations are advocating for using vaccines to create a global ID system using some sort of implant. COVID-19 is the perfect occasion for them to make this happen.
To make sure this happens, the world needs to live in fear and without a cure until that vaccine is released.
One of the many headlines warning against any kind of cure or treatment.
The WHO is also fighting against the most “natural” remedy to a virus: Herd immunity. Indeed, considering the fact that COVID-19 is non-deadly to healthy people, allowing the population to naturally develop antibodies against the virus by just living with it is probably the most natural way to combat it. Some countries such as Sweden defied the WHO’s dogma, refused to confine its population, and is now claiming that herd immunity could be achieved by June. Of course, the WHO is warning against this strategy. Media sources that are completely sold to the WHO’s agenda have been hard at work to shun this age-old concept. Here’s a headline from The Guardian.
The article can be summed up in two quotes:
“The simple fact is that herd immunity, without a vaccine, is not an easy way forward.”
And the article ends with this aberrant statement.
“I can’t speak for everyone, but personally I’d rather stay inside for a few more months and still see my parents next year.”
These statements are 100% in line with the WHO’s true agenda: No freedom without a vaccine. In order to justify this line of thinking, the article talks about the “sacrifice of the vulnerable on the altar of the economy”. Not unlike other articles warning against any kind of solution, it goes to extremes by claiming that herd immunity would kill millions of elderly people, without considering the fact that a strategy of targeted quarantines could be used for the most vulnerable while allowing healthy people to remain free.
Here’s another article pushing the same agenda.
The article argues that the only solution is an all-out police state.
“We won’t get to herd immunity in the near future. A miracle drug is not in sight. The only way to restart the economy, then, is to put a highly effective system in place to test millions of people, trace their movements, and quickly quarantine those who might have been infected.”
This quote leads us to another reason why the WHO and its elite system want COVID anxiety to last as long as possible: The justification of population surveillance.
Here are some magazine covers and headlines that popped up in the past week.
“Can Big Brother Save Us?” on a French magazine.
A mind-boggling headline from the Times UK.
“Quebec prepares its Big Brother for the 2nd wave”. Cell phones could be tracked,
The WHO has been telling the world that the only viable solution is a vaccine. And they say that a vaccine could take months or years to be available. So what happens until they decide that a vaccine is ready? A police state where high tech surveillance, bio-paranoia, and the forced quarantine of selected people at a moment’s notice. Big Brother is now a “savior” as the constant tracking of individuals and the people they come in contact with is portrayed as the only solution to save lives.
Telling fact: Theresa Tam, Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer, who is currently at the forefront of the country’s pandemic response (while fully abiding by the WHO’s guidelines) appeared in bizarre 2010 movie about a pandemic. The movie “OUTBREAK: Anatomy of a Plague” is about the fictional scenario of the resurgence of smallpox in Canada. What she says during the movie is stunning.
Theresa Tam in the movie “Outbreak: Anatomy of a Plague”.
In the movie, Tam talks about measures to be taken if there’s an outbreak of smallpox. She says:
“If there are people who are non-compliant, there are definitely laws and public health powers that can quarantine people in mandatory settings.”
She adds:
“It’s potential you can track people, put bracelets on their arms, have police and other setups to ensure quarantine.”
She adds:
“It’s potential you can track people, put bracelets on their arms, have police and other setups to ensure quarantine.”
“Police checkpoints are set up on all the bridges and everyone leaving the city required to show proof of vaccination. Those who refuse to cooperate are taken away to temporary detention centers.”
Worldwide China
Through its Orwellian social credit system, its horrific re-education camps, its brutal suppression of dissenting voices, and its constant surveillance of its population, China has been a laboratory for a high-tech new world order. Furthermore, several elite-connected corporations have been aiding China to achieve its aims. Unsurprisingly enough, the WHO has been steadily praising this oppressive regime.
WHO director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus with the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Xi Jinping.
Here’s an extremely symbolic tweet Ghebreyesus’ official account:
At center of the above picture is the hindu deity Shiva, also known as “The Destroyer”. Through destruction, Shiva enables profound transformation. This goes in hand with the elite’s favorite motto: Order Out of Chaos.
Telling fact: There’s also a prominent statue of Shiva at CERN.
In Conclusion
The WHO has been handling this pandemic in a very specific manner. When the virus was solely contained in China, the WHO denounced governments that were looking to restrict travel originating from China. Despite every ounce of common sense, the WHO claimed that restricting travel would not be effective against the spreading of the virus. Once the virus spread across the world, the WHO then pushed for the most the restrictive and destructive confinement policies in human history, causing a massive crash of the economy and a complete reshaping society.
In this unhealthy environment, the WHO strived and went for massive power grabs. The organization is now pushing for the prolonging of these measures and the creation of high-tech police states while waiting for the only cure it will ever approve: A universal vaccine. Considering the fact that Bill Gates is the current top funder of the WHO and that he is also part of ID2020 – which is advocating for using vaccines to create a digital ID using a tattoo or a microchip – we can clearly see what is the true agenda of the WHO: To create a worldwide China.