Where is the False Resistance Now?

Where is the False Resistance now?

Adapted from the Cor Mariae site, started by Machabees, Mar 3, 2017.


Certainly lines have been drawn. But where is the false resistance? Below are the stated positions of each of the three 'resistance' bishops and some of their priests within the false resistance.


[As of March 2017]




To his credit:

• He stood up, for what we publicly know, against the new direction of the neo-sspx within his Eleison Comments of 2012; in which he was clearly and unjustly expelled for. He also stated this in his last [public] letter to Bishop Fellay www.therecusant.com/bp-w-open-letter-to-bp-f
  

• In fairness too, though Bishop Fellay said the expulsion was about “disobedience”, he then restated otherwise on March 2015, and hence, admitted in his Dici.org publication it was about the relations with conciliar rome. Bishop Fellay, quote: “...because of [his] violent criticisms of any relations with the Roman authorities. According to them, such contacts were incompatible with the apostolic work of Archbishop Lefebvre.” New Press Release from Menzingen: Consecration of Fr. Faure

His public position (post 2012 to date):

• Accepts the false “Extraordinary mass” in the 2007 Moto Proprio:
  

• Accepts the false “lifting of the excommunications”. With his own pen, he gives a sincere personal thank you to Benedict XVI:
  

• At his expulsion from the sspx, he wrote an open letter to Bishop Fellay stating he is still a SSPX priest and one of its Bishops cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/two-bishops-in-one-williamson.4814/

• He states however he is NOT of the “Resistance”; he does NOT want to lead NOR organize. He believes it is not going anywhere. “Put away your toys” he declared for anyone wanting to see it transpire. Here is a very good rebuttal to it cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/conference-fr-pfeiffer-november-15-2014-canada.3196

• He states that each priest should be independent and have no organization. Eleison Comments Nov. 3, 2012 stmarcelinitiative.com/andnow/

• He believes in the conciliar church. cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop-williamson-believes-in-the-conciliar-church.3918/
  

• He legitimizes the novus ordo mass saying people can actively go to it. cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop-williamson-states-novus-ordo-mass-is-legitimate.2892/

• He believes and promotes a book on the Church’s INDEX called Maria Valtorta and her Poem of the Man-God. cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop-williamson-believes-valtorta-a-gift-from-god.4027/ The Avrille Dominicans rebuked this www.dominicansavrille.us/wha...-the-poem-of-the-man-god-by-maria-valtorta-2/

• He supports going to sedevacantist masses. Conference in Houston TX (USA) - 25th September, 2016 cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop-williamson-“keeps-digging”.4595/ Starts at 1:17:38

• He administered Confirmations to the Feeneyite Chapel; twice Bishop Richard Williamson Administered Confirmations At Feeneyite Chapel - May 25, 2016He did say in Nov. 2012, quote: “

[/i]stmarcelinitiative.com/andnow/[/quote][/ul]

• He believes in novus ordo “miracles”. (Conference in Mahopac NY (usa), June 2015; Eleison Comments #437, 30th November 2015; Eleison Comments #437, 30th November 2015)

• When asked to retract these errors, Bishop Williamson banged his fist on the table with an emphatic “No! I would not consider it!”. Conference in Veneta, Oregon (USA) - 19th September, 2016 cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop-williamson-“keeps-digging”.4595/

• He says that the Anglican church has true worship in it:
  

• More unbelievable quotes from Bishop Williamson can be found here: Quotes of Bp. Williamson supporting the new religion and conciliarism
  

To his credit:

• He stood firm in the 2012 sspx General Chapter resulting to his departure seeing the persistence of the authorities to succeed in their betrayal to tradition.

• He accepts being a Bishop of the “resistance”.  Concerning the episcopal consecration of Jean-Michel Faure And here, cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/“emergency-mandate”-used-to-consecrate-bishop-faure.2775/

• He started a seminary and founded a new Congregation.cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop-faure-founds-new-congregation.4267/
  

His public position (post 2012 to date):

• He accepts “non una cum” seminarians to be ordained.

[/a][/ul]

• He accepts and supports Bp. Williamson’s belief in the NOM. “Where did you see that Archbishop Lefebvre said that the New Mass is outside the Church?” (Bishop Faure, Letter to Father Ernesto Cardozo, 1/6/2016)

• He accepts and supports Bp. Williamson’s belief in the novus ordo “miracles”. cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/letter-from-fr-altamira-to-bishop-faure.3606/ And confirmed in Bishop Aquinas’ own letter to defend Bishop Williamson’s errors.

[/a][/ul]

• Believes in the conciliar church. “It is not possible that God has abandoned 98% of the souls. We have to read attentively and understand what Bishop Williamson wants to say. There can be, within us, the danger of radicalization.” (Bishop Faure, Sermon 12/06/15, Saltillo, Mexico)

• It was discovered however he founded the new congregation for “political purposes”. "Resistant" Bishops Create New Congregation for Political Reasons

• Refuses to accept other priests who disagree with his errors. “Do not invite Father Cardozo to say Mass.” (Bishop Faure, Letter to the faithful of Santo Andres)

To his credit:

• He stood up side by side with Archbishop Lefebvre in the early days; Was removed by his mother Monastery in Le Barroux France; Chastised by Menzingen being against their own modernism with rome causing a split within the three Traditional monasteries; Detracted from the other traditional Benedictines supported and developed by him -in France and America.
  

• He accepts being a bishop. cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop-thomas-aquinas-osb.3732/ And here,Where is the emergency Apostolic Mandate of Bp. Williamson for Bp. Thomas Aquinas?
  

His public position (post 2012 to date):

• He defends and accepts Bp. Williamson’s position on the NOM:
  

• He defends and accepts Bp. Williamson’s position on the novus ordo “miracles”. cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/dom-thomas-defends-b-williamson-miracles-in-no-masses.3068/
  

• He too supports Sedevacantism in the false resistance. cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop-faure-sajj-seminary-accepts-“non-una-cum”-seminarians-to-be-ordained.4493/
  

• Believes in the conciliar church. “It cannot be said, absolutely, that the conciliar church is not the Catholic Church.” (Bishop Aquinas, “In defense of Bp. Williamson 1”).cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/dom-thomas-defends-b-williamson-miracles-in-no-masses.3068/
  

• Boycotts anyone who goes against Bishop Williamson:
  

To their credit:

• They stood up against Menzingen, finally. cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/avrillé-dominicans-call-out-the-leaders-of-the-sspx.3524/ Though not 100%. cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/avrille-dominicans-new-declaration.2834/ And still resulted in a split within their community.  SSPX erects neo-Dominican Community for Rome Reconciliation
  

• The Dominicans are helping to teach in Bishop Faure new seminary.

Their public position (post 2012 to date):

• The Dominicans stated they are not “taking sides” between those who are opposed to the liberal conciliar sspx to those within the sspx position itself. Avrillé Dominicans July Declaration (analysis) page 22.
  

• They now believe in the conciliar church:
  

• They too support Sedevacantism in the false resistance:
  

• They support the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; and are silent on their errors!

To his credit:

• He was strong and prosperous within the sspx; though silent regarding the deal with the sspx/rome relations.
  

His public position (post 2014 to date):

• To this day, Fr. Zendejas had never stated his public position why he left the sspx. He lets people believe it is because of the sspx/rome relations; but never confirmed nor denied it when directly asked. Being so, there was a real concern from priests and faithful where he was coming from and what his motives were. Archbishop Lefebvre said the faithful have a strict right to know the doctrine of their priests. Fr. Zendejas remained silent; but aggressive in taking over some of the established chapels within the Catholic Resistance. See here directly from the priests themselves:cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/father-zendejas-joins-the-catholic-resistance.2720/
  

• Believes: “The apparent conflict between ‘obedience’ and ‘Truth’ rests on AMBIGUITY”  [Not true. Truth and obedience are not alternatives, they go together.]; There might be salvation outside the conciliar church; The novelty and false teaching of Vatican II came AFTER. See here:www.therecusant.com/fake-resistance-statements   Also, Who is Fr. Gerardo Zendejas? See The Recusant, Issue 31 – November/December 2015 (page 38) www.stmaryskssspxmc.com/?page_id=46

• He supports the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; and is silent on their errors!

To his credit:

• He was strong and prosperous within the sspx and was one of the first with Fr. Pfeiffer to go public with the sspx modernism/rome relations. Fr. Pfeiffer g Fr. Chazal - War on…
  

• He was expelled from the SSPX in Oct. 2012.

• He began SSPX-MCmissions throughout the world with Fr. Pfeiffer.

His public position (post 2012 to date):

• Fr. Chazal believes in N.O. "miracles". cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/fr-chazal-believes-in-n-o-miracles.4399/
  

• Supports Bp. Williamson and the other two false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility regardless of their open errors. Fr. Chazal now dismisses the errors as just to say it is a thing we need to deal with - “I'd rather stick to the dino”.Fr. Chazal's sad letter to the Australian Faithful

• Broke away from the SSPX-MC and announces he is starting his [third?] group. Fr. Chazal breaks with Archbishop Lefebvre; begins hybrid   Yet contradicts himself and says that “centralization and concentration of power” is a bad thing (?).cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/more-foolery-and-slander-from-the-false-resistance.5008/
  

To his credit:

• He stood up as a Prior of th SSPX with admonishment before Bishop Fellay fostering the corruption of modernism within the neo-sspx and sell-out to conciliar Rome.

• He began helping Fr. Chazal in the seminary and missions in Asia.

His public position (post 2014 to date):

• He supports and aligns with the three false resistance bishops out of utility; and down plays Bp. Williamson's errors in a conference he gave in Australia. cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/fr-picots-conference.3687/

To his credit:

• He stood up before Bishop Fellay against the modernism in the neo-sspx.
  

• He is the owner/author of the Non Posumus website and sister site Syllabus-errorum.blogspot

His public position (post 2013 to date):

• Believes and supports Bp. Williamson’s view of the NOM, and it’s novus ordo “miracles”:
  

• He dedicates his two websites to Bp. Williamson’s cause; again out of utility regardless of the errors.
  

To his credit:

• He too stood up against Menzingen for their false deal with Rome.

• He wrote a fantastic article entitled “THE NEW "HERMENEUTICS" OF BISHOP FELLAY Has the Society changed its position?” www.therecusant.com/fr-ortiz-speaks-out

His public position (post 2013 to date):

• He aligns and supports out of utility the three false ‘resistance’ bishops; while remaining silent to their errors, he has come out to attack anyone who is against them:   New Unfounded Attack of Fr. Ortiz against OLMC: The Fathers Respond
  

To his credit:

• He made a declaration against the SSPX/Rome deal. www.therecusant.com/frgirouard-declaration

• Started a chapel in western Canada.
  

His public position (post 2013 to date):

• Refuses to expand in helping missions without personal compensation.cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/false-resistance-contracts.4931/

• He supports the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility and chastises those who don’t. He is silent on their errors!
  

To his credit:

• He was a part of the original stand against Menzingen, openly starting an opposition.
  

His public position (post 2013 to date):

• Became resolute to follow the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; and is silent on their errors!

• Started his own home mission in Utica, New York.
  

[Unknown post false resistance]








To his credit:

• He also stood against Menzingen, openly starting an opposition.

His public position (post 2013 to date):

• With a dialectic, he says he doesn’t agree with what Bp. Williamson said regarding the NOM (above), he yet says that “In this case His Excellency gave bad advice. Most good priests do from time to time. The Church is infallible, priests and bishops are not.” (Fr. MacDonald letter to Mr. Johnson’s false claim defending Bp. Williamson) Reply #6  The dialectic is that Fr. MacDonald remains the error(s) only as a view (conveniently?) of “bad advice” when Bp. Williamson adamantly shows over and over again, Fr. MacDonald knows, a pertinacity in his Eleison Comments and conferences spreading this SAME error!

• Fr. MacDonald now supports and aligns himself in utility to the work of the three false ‘resistance’ bishops NOW remaining silent to their errors. So much so, that he now “defends” them by chastising others who do not support these errant bishops! cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/the-underground-false-resistance.4930/
  

• Fr. MacDonald began to disclose his own precarious understanding of “grace” and the new mass here still under development.  Open letter to the Recusant on Father MacDonald's (and Bishop Williamson's) strange new theology
  

To their credit:

• They stood up respectively against the workings of Menzingen trying to acquire a practical deal with modern Rome.

Their public position (post 2013 to date):

• They all support and align with the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; while silent to their errors!Bishop Faure SAJJ seminary: accepts “non una cum” seminarians to be ordained
  

Conclusion

Many other SSPX priests have called out these three bishops on their compromises and errors, as with the PAX priests aligning with them, only to receive cold-chastisement: repeated refusals of the Catholic sacraments (Confirmations and elevation to Holy orders); As well as repeated refusals to receive Holy oils for the sick and dying!

What is the difference between these three bishops and the three bishops of the neo-sspx committing the SAME betrayals against the faith and tyranny holding the sacraments as weapons? None!

Therefore we as Catholics must continue the perennial fight for the purity of the faith and honor of God Archbishop Lefebvre has stood so mightily for against the Vatican II onslaught designed to apostate souls. Many popes and over 5,000+ bishops have fallen with thousands of other priests and multitudes of Catholics throughout the world. This is NOT a game! Our Lady had foretold this apostation in Fatima and La Salette; do we head the message from heaven or squander like those walking by our Lord hanging on the blood soaked Cross?

Of course the SSPX-MC priests [Frs. Pfeiffer, Hewko and friend priests: Frs. Hugo Riuz, Fuchs, de Mérode, Ernesto Cardozo, Arturo Vargas, Fernando Altamira, Raphaël Arizaga OSB, Bufe, Ribas, to my memory] had spoken out and are on the top of these [false] Catholic bishops' list to boycott. These faithful priests to our Lord have been with the bishops from the beginning, only to be chastised for remaining steadfast according to the guidance of Archbishop Lefebvre; everyone knows this, but turns a blind eye!

Here are some recent articles from these friend priests:

Fr. Cardozo:
www.therecusant.com/cadozo-he-who-gathers-not
And his latest: The Recusant, Issues 38 - Christmas 2016 (page 16) www.stmaryskssspxmc.com/?page_id=46

Fr. Raphael’s latest:
cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/newsletter-from-san-jose-monastery.4540/#post-9101

Fr. Fernando Altamira:
cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/letter-from-fr-altamira-to-bishop-faure.3606/
And his latest, www.therecusant.com/altamira-contra-williamson
Christ needs to be first; not last!

(Matthew 10):
“Everyone therefore that shall confess me before men, I will also confess him before my Father who is in heaven. But he that shall deny me before men, I will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven.”