|
Post by Admin on Sept 3, 2018 14:40:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 5, 2019 15:03:45 GMT
The Angelus - September 1982 Blessed James Fenn
by Malcolm Brennan
Some saints seem to be men and women of clear vision who understand early in life the role they are to play in serving God. Their piety appears while they are still children, their vocations are unmistakable and specific, and no matter what extraordinary circumstances turn up, they seem to know exactly what is to be done and they proceed to do it with dispatch. While our admiration goes out to such holy vessels of grace, perhaps our sympathy goes out more readily to those like Blessed James Fenn who several times had to pick up the shattered pieces of his life and try to start over at something new.
While the former kind of saints display the copious illumination and the clear insight into things spiritual that comes from a steadfast faith, there remains another element of the virtue of faith, which is not so much understanding of God's particular plans as it is a serene confidence in Him. It is an assurance and a child-like trust that, however inscrutable and confounding the situations He puts us in, our duty is always and simply to follow His commands. Perhaps this latter dimension of the first of the theologial virtues is especially suitable during the periods of turmoil and confusion in which James Fenn lived, and in which we live. Born at Montacute in Somersetshire, Blessed James received most of his university education at Oxford during the reign of Queen Mary, the only legitimate child of Henry VIII and his pious wife, Catherine of Aragon. It must have seemed to James at age fourteen when he began his studies there, following the footsteps of two elder brothers, that the long nightmare of England's rebellion against Rome would finally come to an end. But while Queen Mary was zealous to undo the crimes of her father and to restore the "Dower of Our Lady" to its rightful place in the universal Church, all her efforts had ended in failure before Blessed James completed his course of studies. Mary was succeeded in 1558 by her illegitimate sister Elizabeth, who very shortly instituted an oath of supremacy, as her father had done, requiring persons in authority to affirm solemnly that she, and not the pope, was the head of the Church in England. When James Fenn discovered, during the Oxford commencement ceremonies in 1559 that he and his fellow students were required to take the oath as a routine part of the proceedings, he removed his bachelor's hood and stepped down from the platform. Why God had allowed Queen Mary to fail to restore Catholic order, and why Queen Elizabeth succeeded in her destruction, and what the consequences would be of James's refusal of the oath, and why his fellow Catholics blithely took it—all these things must have been disturbing and baffling. But he knew with certainty that the Mystical Body of Christ was not at the beck and call of a lay woman, and he refused to say or pretend otherwise. The obscure causes and consequences of his act would just have to take care of themselves in God's good time; for the present his duty was clear. The authorities tried again to induce him to take the oath but again he refused, and he left Oxford without the degree. However, sympathetic friends found a place for him in his native Somersetshire at Gloucester Hall (now Worcester College) where he tutored students in preparation for university study. During his four years there he married and had two children: a daughter who later watched her father's martyrdom, and a son who was at the English College at Rheims at the time. Little else is known of them. James's father had moved from Montacute, where James was born, to Wells, and once when James was visiting him the local bishop arrested James and demanded that he make the oath of supremacy. James's refusal, according to the statute, constituted an act of high treason and earned the penalty of death. Fortunately, however, someone persuaded the bishop that the oath could not be demanded of anybody at random but only of certain people at certain times, such as at the conferral of academic degrees and holy orders, or a civil post. The bishop reluctantly released his prisoner. This was Bishop Gilbert Berkeley, formerly an Augustinian Canon, who spent most of his episcopal energy in litigation to cut off diocesan pensions to his predecessor's relatives and otherwise to increase his revenues. Since people were obviously out to get him, James abandoned his educational career and moved into his father's old house at the little village of Montacute to live a quiet and retired life of farming with his family. But this career was hardly begun when the vicar of Montacute, Thomas Morley, threatened to proceed against him for failure to comply with the Act of Uniformity. This Act, another feather in Queen Elizabeth's cap, required everyone to receive communion on certain days of the year, and James had failed to comply. Confronted with this threat, James was persuaded by a friend to go into hiding, and he wandered from place to place for two months. In this unsettled state he received news that his young wife had died. He arranged for his two children to be taken care of—we are not told how—and went to stay with an old friend from Oxford. One day near the house where he was staying, a man on horseback rode up, heaped "cartloads of abuse upon him," and began to horsewhip him brutally. This, it turned out, was a relative of several brothers that Blessed James had taught at Gloucester Hall. Under his tutelage the boys had become staunch Catholics, and the family had just recently found this out. For his own safety and out of consideration for his host, he moved again, this time to the home of Sir Nicholas Poyntz. Sir Nicholas was one of those Catholics who somehow managed to avoid confrontation with the government and the new church (perhaps by compromise, alas). He was a generous, open-hearted man, possessed of extensive land holdings, and he appointed James as his steward or business agent—the best there could be, the tenants came to think. Sir Nicholas was a robust man, full of vitality and nervous energy, but he also had a foul tongue and a fierce temper. James Fenn, by contrast, was slight of build, modest and unhurried in his ways. One day Sir Nicholas ordered James to do something or other and, noticing James's slow and deliberate manner of going about it, flew into a rage and shouted at him, "Mend your pace, you gallows-bird, or I will mow your sluggardly ankles with this scythe!" Blessed James replied, "Noble sir, by the eternal God I pray you to wait patiently, for you shall see, if God wills, that with all this slow pace, I will yet finish your business betimes, and wholly according to your desire." As if to illustrate that "a soft answer turneth away wrath," Sir Nicholas was reduced to tears of remorse for his harsh treatment. Sir Nicholas told this story many times in later years and he also declared that all the while that Blessed James lived at his estate, Iron Acton, his whole life and conversation were one continuous, uninterrupted sermon. One of the occasional visitors to Iron Acton was a wise and virtuous priest, probably John Colleton, who was greatly impressed with James's prudence, judiciousness and piety. He advised James, a widower now in his late thirties, to seek ordination abroad; accordingly James began his fourth career at the seminary at Rheims in 1579. He was ordained the next year and returned immediately to Somersetshire, where the position of the Church was deteriorating badly, partly because of the Queen's intimidations and partly because of a religious indifference that resulted from them, particularly among the lower classes.For a year he worked unmolested as a missionary where he had grown up, and he reconciled many to the Church; yet while he convinced many others of the truth of the Catholic cause, they declined to put themselves in jeopardy for its sake. In the second year of his ministry Father Edmund Campion was captured in an extensive manhunt, and it was probably because of all the commotion surrounding Campion that Father Fenn was also arrested shortly afterwards, although the authorities did not know that he was a priest. He was imprisoned temporarily at Ilchester. One day he was set in the town square in heavy chains for passers-by to mock at and abuse. They, however, impressed by his tranquil dignity and patient endurance, declined to play their role in the program. In fact, the episode began to stir up the religiously indifferent populace and to make religion once again a lively topic. From Ilchester the prisoner was sent to London and lodged in the Marshalsea prison, probably in September 1581. James found himself in the company of over a dozen other priests whom the dragnet had hauled in, but he was not as closely confined as they because his priesthood was still not known to the authorities, and indeed would not be for two years. Blessed James gave himself over to his priestly ministry in prison, secretly of course, drawn especially to the wretches guilty of the worst offenses. One such was a pirate who, because of his many and heinous crimes, had given up all hope of saving either his life or his soul. On the night before his execution, Blessed James comforted him with assurances of the inexhaustible mercies of God and, in the words of an early biographer, "bade him take as his example and patron the thief who was lifted up on the cross with Christ our Saviour," and whose very short prayer was answered so sweetly by Our Lord. "Finally he expounded to him a few of the chief heads of Catholic doctrine, so far as the shortness of time and the perils of his position would admit." The pirate was convinced, made his confession, and received the Holy Viaticum early next morning. Later in the day he flatly refused "to communicate in the Calvinistic manner," even in the face of promises of his freedom and of threats of torture upon the rack. When asked to pray with the crowd at the gallows, he refused to unite with the heretics and instead professed his new faith; and he praised the providence of God, who had brought him into prison and thereby into the Church. "With these words the catechumen of one night was turned off the ladder and strangled in the noose, to pass as confessor and martyr to the triumph of one day, but that a day most bright and beautiful, to which no nightfall shall ever put an end." For about a year before his own martyrdom, as if he had a premonition of it, Blessed James began to live as a hermit, so far as his ministry and the guards permitted, no longer seeking solace in the company of his fellow sufferers, but drawing apart for long sessions of silent prayer. In the latter half of 1583, he was recognized as a priest, perhaps betrayed by someone he had served, and he was lodged more strictly in a cell with three other priests. Even so they managed to say Mass occasionally, although constrained to use a tin cup for a chalice. Shortly after Father Fenn was discovered to be a priest, it pleased the Queen's Privy Council, for reasons of state, to execute some more priests. Blessed James was accused of having entered a conspiracy in September 1581 at Rheims to murder the Queen. The court and the jury were unimpressed when he pointed out that he had not been in Rheims at that time but in Marshalsea Prison. They found him guilty and condemned him to die, along with half a dozen other priests. The weeks between his sentence and his execution he spent in "the pit," a twenty foot deep hole, unlighted, unventilated, and with such sanitary facilities as may be imagined. He was executed with two others, Venerable George Haydock and Venerable Thomas Hemerford, secular priests like himself and his "co-conspirators" against the Queen. All protested their innocence to the end and professed their faith steadfastly. His daughter Frances had seen him hauled away from the Tower of London on a hurdle, but whether she witnessed this spectacle is not known. One of the officials rebuked his fellows: "You play the knaves. These be men; let them be used like men." And he ordered that they at least be allowed to hang until they were dead. But the knaves prevailed. Blessed Father Fenn regained his senses after he was removed from the gallows, and he was quite conscious when they opened his belly to remove his bowels. Parts of his body were displayed on the four main gates of the city and his head was mounted on a long pole on London Bridge. And so passed into glory Blessed James Fenn. He never quite mastered the worldly forces that shaped his life and his age, but he triumphed over the masters of this world by his generous perseverance in the service of God and His Church. " Martyrs of the English Reformation", formerly called " English Martyrs" is written each month by Dr. Malcolm Brennan, Professor of English at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. [Emphasis - The Catacombs]
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 6, 2019 13:08:22 GMT
The Angelus - July 1978
Saint Cuthbert Mayne
English Martyrs
Malcolm Brennan
While the lives of mighty churchmen and the deeds of heroic saints attract our attention naturally, it is still well worth while to try to understand the condition of ordinary Catholics, especially during a time of crisis. Saint Cuthbert Mayne, although his death was spectacular, was in fact a rather simple and ordinary man who lived up to his vocation as a priest. Before following his story, let us have a look at what life was like in England four hundred years ago. Here is a contemporary account: These events were not cases of the lawlessness of petty officials or outbreaks of popular religious intolerance. These were, rather, the enforcement of laws designed to wipe out the Catholic faith in England. The persecution of Catholics was an essential and prominent part of Queen Elizabeth's official policy to establish the Church of England. Englishmen did not simply change their religion in the sixteenth century. It was changed for them, by intimidation at first, then by brute force.During the short reign of the Catholic Queen Mary (1553-1558), most Englishmen thought they had seen the end of the madness of Henry VIII and the fanaticism of Edward VI's protectors. But Mary's return of sanity in religion was not done well, and the disease of heresy had spread further than most people seemed ready to acknowledge. Elizabeth reversed Mary's policies and far exceeded the novelties of her father and her half-brother. She plundered Church properties as her father had done, she asserted her supreme authority in the Church, she replaced the Mass with a communion service (Cranmer's, though he was dead now), and she provided heavy fines both for those who resisted the innovations and for those who urged resistance. For example, to encourage a priest to say the old Mass earned a fine of 100 marks (about $500.00) for the first offense, quadruple that for the second, and loss of all goods and chattels and life imprisonment for the third. The penalty for the priest who said a Mass—or for just being a priest within the realm—was death. Even failure to attend the new services was punished, at first rather haphazardly, but ferociously later on.The English people in general, even thirty years after the events for which More and Fisher gave their lives, could still be called Catholics, but their reaction to the new religion which Elizabeth was fashioning was deficient. Because the prescribed homilies, the new doctrinal formulations, and the new rites of worship were deliberately ambiguous and equivocal in key points, and because the sanctions were not imposed spectacularly at first, men found it easy to temporize, to compromise, to suspend judgment, to postpone decisions, and to imagine that they could cherish the traditional faith interiorly while they conformed exteriorly to the new requirements. Nearly all the bishops, to their everlasting honor, refused to take Elizabeth's Oath of Supremacy, having learned a lesson from their predecessors a quarter century earlier under Henry VIII, but those who refused were replaced by new men zealous to stamp out the old practices. For instance, the new Archbishop of York, Edmund Grimbal, ordered that: Meanwhile the faithful shepherds, deposed from their sees, languished in exile, or they suffered in prison where many died of disease or starvation. Thus those who wished to resist the reformation in England were rendered leaderless. Is it a sin to attend the new communion service? Since the bread is only bread, what can be the harm? On these and similar issues good men were divided, but most of all no one spoke with authority. Thus the years rolled by, and thus most men and women came by stages to accept what they had at first only tolerated, their beliefs gradually clouded, their wills progressively weakened. Their outward conformity begot by degrees an inward assent, or a cynical indifference to religious matters.This part of Queen Elizabeth's persecution, while not the bloodiest, is yet in a way the most vile, because it succeeded in destroying the faith and moral character of millions. Into this arid wasteland came, like a bolt of lightening, the 'seminary priests' and the Jesuits—splendid men burning with charity, spiritually formed, liberally educated, learned in Scripture, prudent in spiritual counselling, skilled in preaching and disputation, and determined to root out from their native land the choking weed of heresy. Cuthbert Mayne was the proto-martyr of the seminary priests. Seminaries were a new idea born of the Catholic Counter-Reformation, promoted by Pope Saint Pius V and decreed by the Council of Trent. The first one was founded at Douai, France, by William Allen (later Cardinal) of Lancashire, and it was staffed by scholars from Oxford and Cambridge, for many of the best university men had chosen to flee their homeland rather than acquiesce in the new religion. Born in 1544, Cuthbert was raised according to the reformed religion. His uncle was a comfortably beneficed cleric, and he intended his nephew to succeed him. Accordingly Cuthbert was sent to Oxford to prepare for Anglican ordination, which he received, and he began his pastoral duties in that city. However, at Oxford he came under the influence of men who were still staunchly Catholic, particularly Edmund Campion, who later became the epitome of the new Catholic missionaries, and Gregory Martin, who was later the main author of the Douai-Rheims translation of the Bible. Mayne soon came to understand that he was in the wrong religion, and he was not left long in doubt what he should do about it. A letter to him on matters of the faith was intercepted by the authorities, who ordered his arrest. Cuthbert was out of town at the time, and when his friends got word to him that he was a wanted man, he fled the country. He became one of the earliest students at Dr. Allen's seminary at Douai, and when he finished the rigorous and exhilerating course of priestly formation, he was sent immediately into the vineyard in 1576. Father Mayne began his ministry as the 'steward' at the country house of Francis Tregian in Cornwall. Here he said Mass, administered the sacraments, and reconciled to the Church many who had fallen into error. Word of his presence went round, but within a year the high sheriff of Cornwall conducted a raid on Mr. Tregian's house. His search was a success, for Catholics had not yet perfected their systems of lookouts and places of hiding for priests and their equipment. The incriminating evidence consisted of such things as an Agnus Dei (i.e., a small plaster disk embossed with the figure of the Lamb of God) and a copy of Gregory XIII's bull concerning indulgences for the Jubilee Year of 1575 (now expired). Mr. Tregian and several other laymen were charged with giving aid and comfort to a priest. After a most irregular trial Saint Cuthbert Mayne was sentenced to be hanged, drawn and quartered. "Which sentence pronounced," a contemporary account records, "Cuthbert Mayne, with a most mild and gladsome countenance, lifting up his eyes and hands unto Heaven, only said, 'God be thanked.' " The laymen were sentenced to forfeiture of goods and life imprisonment. On the day before his execution, Next day he was drawn roughly on a hurdle to the market place where the knives, the fire, and a very high gibbet were prepared. He was required to climb the ladder backwards and was allowed a short speech. He began with a plea for the innocence of his host, Francis Tregian, and the other laymen, but one of the justices quickly interrupted with an order to put the rope on his neck. "And then let him preach afterward." (The magistrate spoke better than he knew, for the execution became a powerful sermon in blood.) Then he was turned off the ladder abruptly and cut down while his body still swung in wide arc. He fell in such sort that his head first encountered the scaffold which was there prepared of purpose to divide the quarters, so that the one side of his face was sorely bruised and one of his eyes driven far out of his head. After he was cut down, the hangman first spoiled him of his clothes . . . and then in a butcherly manner opening his belly, he rent up his bowels and after tore out his heart, the which as a plausible spectacle he held up aloft in his hand. Lastly his head was cut off and his body divided into four quarters, which afterwards were dispersed and set up on the castle at Launceston, one quarter sent unto a town called Bodmin, the most populous town in Cornwall, another to a town called Barnstaple in Devonshire whereabout [Mayne] was born, the third into a town called Tregony, not above a mile distant from Mr. Tregian's house, the fourth into Wadebridge, the most common travelled way in that county. The holy death of this first of the new breed of priests was broadcast by the heretics themselves. And the government's harsh policy was further confirmed when the high sheriff was granted knighthood for his conduct of the affair (that is, for following the instructions from London on how to conduct it). The Catholic faith had been well on the way to utter obliteration in England (as happened in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden), except for those champions of Christ led by Saint Cuthbert Mayne, because (in the words of Tertullian) "The more you mow us down, the more we grow: the blood of Christians is the seed." Dr. Malcolm Brennan is Professor of English at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. [Emphasis - The Catacombs]
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 7, 2019 11:42:45 GMT
The Angelus - May 1979Saint Alexander Briant
Martyrs of the English Reformation
by Dr. Malcom Brennan
What are the methods of those who attack Holy Church? And what are the methods they use? And how does a good Catholic, who has a lively sense of his own sinful weaknesses, comport himself in such combats? The answers to these questions are as deep as the mystery of iniquity and the mystery of grace, and they are as varied as the long history of persecution. But the last days of Saint Alexander Briant provide a particularly intimate view of the motives, torments, and consolations that are part of martyrdom.Born in 1556 to a yeoman family in Somerset, Alexander had become an Oxford scholar by his eighteenth year, 1574. Like so many of Oxford's best sons, and under the influence of Robert Persons and others, he began to find the innovations in religion intolerable, and three years later he was enrolled in the English seminary at Douay. He was ordained to the priesthood in March 1579 and sent on the English mission the following year. Having landed in England in August 1580, he remained at liberty only until the following April, laboring at first in his native Somersetshire as "a priest of the greatest zeal," where among other things he reconciled Robert Persons's father to the Church, and then in London where he was captured. The ferocity of his captors is due to several causes. In the first place, the English government felt stung and threatened by the formal and public excommunication of Queen Elizabeth by Pope Saint Pius V. Rome's shrewdest minds had long considered such a delicate diplomatic ploy, and the capitals of Europe had lengthily disputed its advantages and disadvantages—not the least of which latter was the jeopardy into which it might place the Catholics in England. To the distress of many cautious politicians, the saintly Pope with little consultation simply called the situation as he saw it. The woman was a heretic. Nor did he flinch at the full implications of this judgment by the supreme spiritual authority on earth: he declared Elizabeth deposed and Englishmen no longer subject to her civil authority—to say nothing of her pretended spiritual authority. The prudence of his Bull, Regnans in Excelsis, and what might have been accomplished by alternate means, is still in dispute, but it had this great advantage then and in the centuries since, that it told unequivocally and boldly—like Pius V's other great monument, the Roman Missal—what the mind of the Church was. Men in England could be certain now of whether they were in the Church or out, without having to agonize over the comparative weight to give to a pious exhortation here, a diplomatic initiative there, or a theological opinion yonder. And what is a pope for, after all, but to shed Christ's light on such crucial issues? Elizabeth and her government were furious and, although the Bull had been published ten years before, they expected an immanent invasion from Europe's Catholic princes. In addition to this, there was a great influx of Jesuits and seminary priests beginning in about 1580. Besides the threat which they posed to the new-fangled religion which Elizabeth had established, the government imagined they were spies come to stir up rebellion in anticipation of the invasion supposedly orchestrated by the Pope. Many of the officials who dealt with the missionaries—whether through policy, like Elizabeth and Burghley, or directly, like the rack-master Norton or the master spy Walsingham—were simply unequipped with the mental capacity to take seriously the spiritual, non-political purposes which the missionaries professed. Thirdly and more immediately, the authorities were in pursuit of Father Robert Persons when they captured Father Briant, and they were convinced that he could lead them to Persons—as indeed he could. They were infuriated by the eloquence of St. Edmund Campion's Brag and Decem Rationes and by the effrontery of Father Persons in printing them and other writings right in England. In following the scent of Father Persons, who was never caught, they netted Father Briant and others. Father Briant's treatment, then, was the harsher for these multiple motives. He was cast into the Counter, a plain prison not equipped with modern methods of extracting information. A simple method of torture was, therefore, used—starvation. Thinking he would die of thirst, he tried to catch rainwater in his hat, but he could not reach out to the eaves of the building. After six fruitless days he was transferred to the better equipped Tower and there loaded with exceedingly heavy shackles. A history published the following year (by Father Persons) explained that "because he would not confess where he had seen Father Persons, how he was maintained, where he had said Mass, and whose confessions he had heard, they caused needles to be thrust under his nails, whereat Fr. Briant was not moved at all, but with a constant mind and pleasant countenance, said the Psalm Miserere, desiring God to forgive his tormentors; whereat Dr. Hammond [one of the examiners] stamped and stared, as a man half beside himself, saying, "What thing is this?" "Pricking" was a torture usually reserved for witches if they seemed insensible to other pain. This failing to elicit the desired information, he was thrown into the pit, "a subterraneous cave, twenty feet deep, without light", according to a fellow inmate. After eight days in the pit he was put directly to the rack, where he again revealed nothing, and so was returned to his cell. "Yet the next day following," the early historian records, "notwithstanding the great distemperature and soreness of his whole body, his senses being dead and his blood congealed (for this is the effect of racking), he was brought to the torture again, and there stretched with greater severity than before; insomuch that supposing within himself that they would pluck him in pieces, ... he put on the armor of patience, resolving to die rather than to hurt any living creature, and having his mind raised in contemplation of Christ's bitter Passion. He swooned away, so that they were fain to sprinkle cold water on his face to revive him again: yet they released no part of his pain. "And here Norton, because they could get nothing of him, asked him whether the Queen were supreme head of the Church of England or not? To this he answered, 'I am a Catholic and I believe in this as a Catholic should do.' 'Why,' said Norton, 'they say the Pope is.' 'And so say I,' answered Fr. Briant. Here also the Lieutenant [of the Tower, Sir Owen Hopton] used railing and reviling words, and bobbed him under the chin and slapped him on the cheeks after an uncharitable manner, and all the commissioners rose up and went away, giving commandment to leave him so all night." After these failures they transferred him to Wales-bourne prison to recover, "where, not able to move hand or foot or any part of his body, he lay in his clothes fifteen days together, in great pain and anguish." Writing a few weeks after these events, Father William Allen of Douay Seminary reported that "he laughed at his tormentors, and though nearly killed by the pain, said, 'Is this all you can do? If the rack is no more than this, let me have a hundred more for this cause.'" Later during his imprisonment, Saint Alexander Briant had an opportunity to write of these matters. In a letter addressed to the Jesuit Fathers of England, he offered to become a member of the Society, if they would have him, and he explained how this idea had grown in him. Saint Alexander offered the account of these events as evidence that his vocation to the Jesuits was a true one, seeing that the consolations came as he vowed to join the Society, but he asked for the judgment of wiser heads. Although Saint Alexander did not live long enough for his request to be acted upon, it has long been customary in the Church to call him by the name he longed for, Jesuit. The great manhunt for St. Edmund Campion and Father Persons continued apace while St. Alexander spent his days in a dungeon or on the rack—so that Norton boasted about having made him a foot longer than God had made him—and the hunt continued to capture other priests. In mid-June Campion was taken, and he, Briant, and six other priests were indicted together. They were charged with the treason of conspiring to foment rebellion. Few details of St. Alexander's treatment from early summer until his trial on November 17. For the trial he contrived to make a little wooden crucifix, small enough to be covered by his hand, on which he had drawn in charcoal a figure of Our Lord. He was punished for this impertinency. Also he cut away the hair on the crown of his head and by rough tonsure proclaimed his orders. He was tried with the second group of priests but execution was with the first. He was tied to a hurdle with Ralph Sherwin and dragged from the Tower to Tyburn through mud of that nasty December day behind the hurdle of St. Edmund Campion. He watched the execution of his two companions. When he stood in the cart beneath the gallows with the rope about his neck, Saint Alexander Briant, Jesuit, was canonized by Pope Paul in 1970. Dr. Brennan is Professor of English at The Citadel in Charleston, S. Carolina. [Emphasis - The Catacombs]
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 9, 2019 13:53:44 GMT
The Angelus - December 1978
Saint Oliver Plunkett
English Martyrs
by Malcolm Brennan
OLIVER PLUNKETT'S career provides glimpses of many things: the progress of the reformation heresies, the vitality of the counter-reformation Catholic Church, Ireland and the Church in Ireland devastated by persecution, and Plunkett's own career toward sanctity. Oliver was born into the tight network of Anglo-Irish gentry in 1625, and he was educated by his kinsman, Patrick Plunkett, later bishop of Meath, whom Oliver venerated all his life. In his teens he was sent to Rome to complete his education. Upon ordination to the priesthood in 1654, when he would normally have returned to Ireland, he requested and received permission to remain in Rome because of the severe Cromwellian persecutions still raging at home. He stayed in Rome fifteen more years, but not idly. An apt administrator and teacher, he was perfectly attuned to the extensive, canonically systematized bureaucracies of the Holy City, and he was moving comfortably up the ladder of ecclesiastical success. Outside of office hours he gave himself up to good works, especially at the hospital of Santo Spirito. It seemed for all the world that he would live out a useful and blameless life there. But then, surprisingly, the legalistic and orderly minds of counter-reformation Rome selected Oliver, at the age of 44, to be Archbishop of Armagh, a position which also carries the title Primate of All Ireland. He was an administrator and a theologian almost totally without pastoral experience as even a parish priest much less as bishop and head of a national hierarchy. And, while he no doubt knew the intra-mural politics of the Curia and had kept in touch with events in Ireland, he had little experience of national and international affairs. THE condition of the Church in Ireland when Archbishop Plunkett landed in 1670 was desolate. Besides the regular havoc wrought by the Reformation, the Irish had suffered centuries of oppression and abuse at the hands of the English. In addition, Ireland had been a main battleground between the royal armies of King Charles I and the Puritan Parliament's "army of saints" led by the fanatic Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell's final victories were followed by measures to suppress the Anglican church, and a fortiori, the Catholic. There were repeated bloody attempts to eradicate the Catholic clergy and to obliterate the Faith. Part of Cromwell's final solution to the Irish problem was to drive whole populations of native Irish from the lands of their fathers into the stark wildernesses of Connaght, west of the Shannon, populations already debilitated by war, famine, religious persecution, and plague, and to give their lands to those who had financed or fought for Cromwell. Thousands of the orphans thus produced, and others, were sold into slavery for plantation labor in the West Indies, not by a few enterprising renegades but by official policy of the Puritan conquerors. When the Puritan extravaganza collapsed and a king was restored to England's throne, Ireland returned to the less consistent persecution of the English monarchy. The confused state of political affairs is indicated by the fact that while King Charles II was executing harsh laws against Catholics (under pressure from his Parliament), his Queen, Catherine, lived a full Catholic life with a numerous Catholic clergy in her retinue. IT was into this state of affairs that Oliver returned to his homeland after an absence of 23 years. A good measure of the still inhospitable climate is that the Primate of All Ireland donned the disguise of a soldier for his first few months home. He was later criticized for this—dashing around the countryside on a fine horse and in a blond wig, stopping at a tavern, drinking the host's health, bussing a barmaid on the cheek, and clattering off again with swords and gear rattling. (Strange stuff these Roman bureaucrats were made of.) After learning where he could operate safely—for, despite the policies of the central government, the hereditary aristocracy still exercised extensive rule in their own feudal domains—he got down to the serious business of building up the Church. First, and constantly through his career, there were confirmations, hundreds and thousands of them, for bishops had not operated freely for many decades. Next he established schools for boys and clergy. They were a great success obtained at enormous personal sacrifice, but the government shut them down in less than four years. The clergy was numerous but mostly of very low calibre. Education was scant among them, strong drink a blight, concubinage common, and at least one pastor supplemented his income by highway robbery. Dominican and Franciscan friars were at each others' throats, sometimes literally and at the very altar. Archbishop Plunkett was necessarily severe in dealing with these matters, but never unfair. The interesting thing is not that he made bitter enemies in dealing with refractory clergy—one deposed cleric hired assassins to kill him—but that his orderly, clerical, canonically oriented, Romanized mind was adequate to the job . . . and more than adequate, because the results were immediate, solid and enduring. BY 1673 the favorable winds—shifted again. All Catholic clergy were ordered to register and report to seaports for exile. Oliver Plunkett had long since learned the art of compromise, of making the best of a bad situation, but at this juncture he counselled resistance. He and his old friend from student days in Rome, John Brennan, now Bishop of Waterford, found a dilapidated shack in a remote district and endured a harsh winter in it, sick and near starvation. These events marked a major turning point in St. Oliver's spiritual development and are the true beginnings of his real saintliness. Heretofore he had always worked for God and His Church, diplomatically adapting the circumstances before him to the cause of religion. But now he had taken a posture of defiance of the circumstances before him, abandoning diplomacy for a prophetic stance. Heretofore he had suffered willingly, as for his beloved schools, but now the sufferings were in a way absolute, uncompromising, because they could not be calculated as proportional to some worthwhile earthly project. He had reached a new kind of battle ground and, thank God, he was equal to the struggle. He knew that his present sufferings were not now for schools and synods and confirmation schedules but were rather in imitation of the Good Shepherd who lay down His life for His sheep—that somehow they worked for the glory of God and the salvation of souls in the purely spiritual order now that the ecclesiastical order was in ruins. Yet he did not, thank God and thanks to his theological formation in Rome, adopt a silly Anabaptist or Lutheran aversion or condescension to the "institutional church." When the wave of persecution fizzled out and a sort of normalcy returned, Oliver resumed his episcopal ministry with customary zeal and busyness—but now with a fuller sensitivity to the supernatural and a more complete abandonment to Providence. This temporary calm was broken by a fanatic outburst of anti-Catholic feeling cultivated in ill-disposed minds by the devilish imagination of Titus Gates and his patron, Lord Shaftsbury. Oates concocted an elaborate Popish Plot, a scheme supposedly engineered mainly by Jesuits to take over the whole country, replace the king with his Catholic brother, and massacre the Protestants. Oates suddenly became the "saviour of the nation," and his mere accusation was practically sufficient to send men to the gallows. He is conservatively credited with thirty-five such judicial murders. An important part of the Plot was the Irish connection: a 40,000 (or sometimes 70,000) man army was supposedly waiting there to invade England. When Archbishop Plunkett, again in hiding, was arrested on orders from London in 1679, the prosecution strategy was to show him to be a leader in the Popish Plot. The course of his imprisonment and trial is a tale in itself—the trial's illegal removal from Ireland to London, the consequent impossibility of assembling defense witnesses, the testimony of Catholic clerics against him, the shameful scheming of politicians, the incredible gullibility of otherwise sober men, the fanaticism of Catholic-haters, and the like. But more cogent than that tale is the story of St. Oliver's growth in sanctity. THE idea of dying for the Faith could never have been very far from the minds of Catholics in the British Isles during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. But martyrdom is a good bit more than just being done in because one is Catholic—though that might fit some minimal definition of the term. Rather, it is a stupendous event in the supernatural order, an imitation of and an extension of and a participation in the redemptive passion of Christ. In some cases—like that of the innocents slaughtered by Herod—the victims seem unaware of their role as martyrs; nor even in retrospect can we fully understand why Our Lord's advent required their bloody sacrifice. In other cases, the victim is required over and over again to face agonies of decision to follow Our Lord. In either case, anguished or not, what seems to be essential is a total abandonment of oneself to God. But this emptying of oneself, this passivity, this passion like Our Lord's, is not finally obliteration, but it is, paradoxically, a highly personal act of heroic courage. Christ promised to his martyrs, "In patience you shall possess your souls" (Gospel, Second Mass of Several Martyrs, Roman Missal)— that is, to give the soul up to suffering is somehow to be pre-eminently self-possessed. Oliver Plunkett was kept in solitary confinement from October to May in the very cold winter of 1680-81. Newgate Prison records call him "very ancient [he was 55] and subject to diverse infirmities," and they report his painful sufferings "by reason of his close confinement and want of assistance for the distemper of the stone and the gravel, which often afflicts him." He also suffered from filth and fetters. A fellow prisoner wrote: This report comes from Father Maurus Corker, a Benedictine who had been found innocent of treason but was still imprisoned. The most extraordinary friendship developed between him and Saint Oliver. They met face to face only once, when they gave each other absolution, yet they carried on a lively correspondence between their cells. Father Maurus goes on: Saint Oliver's career, at least its busiest parts, had been characterized by determination, self-assurance, and what some had called touchiness, but in his last weeks he successfully rid himself of all vestiges of self-will. Father Maurus describes it: ON the day of his death, Saint Oliver was allowed to say Mass with McKenna as his server, and then he awaited his execution with equanimity. Tied to a hurdle behind a horse, the Primate of All Ireland was dragged the two miles from Newgate Prison to Tyburn's 'triple tree.' He was permitted to address the crowds, which he did with a prepared speech asserting his innocence of treason. Afterwards, as he said some prayers in Latin, the cart was driven out from under him and he was left hanging. Though he may have been dead when they cut him down, the executioners proceeded with the full rigours of the traitor's death. Archbishop Plunkett's words and his demeanor and his blood seem to have had an impact. The crowd treated him sympathetically, and throughout the country the frenzy of the Popish Plot soon abated. St. Oliver Plunkett was the last Catholic executed in England for his Faith. He died July 11, 1681, and was canonized on October 20,1975. DR. MALCOLM BRENNAN is Professor of English at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. He and the staff of THE ANGELUS are deeply grateful to those readers who have written about this column this year. We hoped, when it began last Spring, that it would be of benefit to you—and, judging from your many letters—it has, indeed!
[Emphasis - The Catacombs]
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 11, 2019 12:11:23 GMT
The Angelus - January 1979 Saint Robert Southwell
English Martyrs
by Malcolm Brennan
STUDENTS OF ENGLISH literature know Robert Southwell, S. J., as a "sweet singer" of delicate and sensitive poetry. And while his life and writings show him to be a very gentle man and capable of exquisite and even dainty emotions, he is also to be seen as a man of tough determination and fearless constancy. Tender sentiments will not make an ordinary saint, much less a martyr. Born into an ancient and illustrious family in about 1560, Robert was stolen from his cradle by a gypsy or vagabond. He later reflected on the family tale: "What if I had remained with the vagrant? How abject! How destitute of the knowledge or the reverence of God! In what debasement of vice, in what great peril of crimes, in what indubitable risk of a miserable death and eternal punishment!" While the language is a bit theatrical, it should not be construed as an aristocrat's revulsion toward the lower orders; rather, it is a generous compassion for the spiritual dangers that afflict the destitute. For his education Robert was sent very early to the Continent and studied in Paris under Father Thomas Darbyshire, the former archdeacon of Essex who, for conscience' sake had relinquished his considerable ecclesiastical preferments at the accession of Queen Elizabeth. Robert's vocation to the priesthood came early, as did his attraction to the Jesuits. Always an excellent student, he attended the English college at Douai, then the Jesuit novitiate in Rome. He was ordained a priest in 1584. AS CHRIST WEPT over Jerusalem before entering it for His Passion, Father Southwell grieved over conditions in England and longed to join the English mission, and he returned to his native land in 1586—at just about the time that Shakespeare was beginning his career in London. We know too little about the first six years of his mission, and not much more about the last three, which were spent in prison. We know that he had a kind of refuge in London at the home of Anne, Countess of Arundel; her husband the Earl, St. Philip Howard, was imprisoned in London Tower, where he eventually died. And we know of a few episodes, such as Fr. Gerard's account of his and Fr. Southwell's narrow escape from some pursuivants who had surrounded the house where they said Mass. Although Robert had not seen many of his kin since early childhood and could not have known them as having a special claim on his ministry—both those who were faithful to the Church and threatened by the government, and especially those whose Faith was weak. But making contact with even his family was troublesome and dangerous because, he being a wanted man, the government kept watch on his kin as a likely way to capture him. Every overture, then, every contact endangered both himself and the person to whom his charity extended. And even when the danger was braved, the overture might require the utmost delicacy. A very long letter to his father states in very precise and very moving terms his filial love and obedience to his father in the flesh, but at the same time St. Robert severely rebukes his father as a wayward son in the spirit: for his father, while he had not abandoned the Faith, had dangerously compromised it for the sake of advancement at Court. The physically dangerous and morally painful situations of his missionary life are apparent in the episode of his capture. Anne Bellamy, a kinswoman, had shown notable marks of piety in her youth. Arrested for her Faith, however, she succumbed to the baleful pressure of the notorious Topcliffe, and she later married one of his vicious crew. At Topcliffe 's instigation, she sent word to Fr. Southwell that she was troubled in conscience and would like to meet with him at Uxenden Hall, her family's estate. Having visited the family often, he knew the house well and he knew Anne's recent history. Suspicious or not, he kept the appointment. When Topcliffe arrived with his assistant, Thomas Fitzherbert, they were able to go immediately to the 'priest's hole' which Anne had revealed and drag the priest forth as a most important trophy. RICHARD TOPCLIFFE was the vilest of men and enjoyed the special favor of 'Good Queen Bess.' He is the only man in the history of England who was authorized to maintain a torture chamber in his home. He suited the Queen's purposes because his fanatical hatred of Catholics, combined with an utter absence of scruples, made him an effective priest-hunter. His later fall from the Queen's favor reveals his sordid character. It seems that he had engaged with Thomas Fitzherbert, his assistant, to get rid of Fitzherbert's father and uncle, along with a Mr. Bassett, in return for a large share of the inheritance thus produced. When the older Fitzherberts died, young Thomas refused to share the inheritance, which he had heavily mortgaged anyway. He claimed that the old men, in their seventies and imprisoned, had died of natural causes. Topcliffe was indignant at this double dealing and had the confidence to address the petition to the Queen. He had carried out his part of the bargain in good faith, in fact he had spent seven years in hounding the old men to their deaths; could not the Queen do something about unworthy subjects like the faithless Fitzherbert? We do not know how far Topcliffe's petition might have gone, for in defending it before the Privy Council he made the mistake of accusing one of the members of having accepted a bribe to obstruct the course of justice. So, Topcliffe finally fell into disgrace—affluent disgrace. St. Robert Southwell's three year prison career thus began in Topcliffe's home, where he was tortured ten (some say thirteen) times before being transferred to a regular prison. Before his capture he had often written letters to his superiors about the harsh treatment of Catholic prisoners, especially priests. His own treatment was among the worst. He was hung up by metal straps around his wrists and, because the ceiling was low, his legs were bent back and tied to his thighs so that nothing of him would touch the floor. On occasion he remained thus for seven hours together.DURING HIS STAY in the Tower, St. Robert was kept in a dungeon called Limbo, a small cubicle infested with vermin, without light or ventilation, and with a nauseous stench. His father, finally worthy of his son, addressed a petition to the Queen, begging "that if his son had committed anything for which, by the laws, he had deserved death, he might suffer death; If not, as he was a gentleman, he hoped her Majesty would be pleased to order that he should be treated as a gentleman, and not be confined any longer to that stinking hole." Thereafter the harshness of his treatment was somewhat abated. When Saint Robert was arrested Topcliffe had to be ecstatic at the capture of so 'weighty' a man. The purpose of the torture was, besides pure cruelty and meaness, to make the saint implicate other priests and Catholics or, best of all, abjure the Faith. Saint Robert was, however, a model of patient endurance, and he gave to his captors and tormentors nothing but charity and the confession, frequently repeated in the midst of his agonies, "My God and my all."It was during his imprisonment that Father Southwell wrote many of the poems which have given him a modest fame. One will have to do as a sample of his work. [Please see insert.] It earned extremely high praise from Ben Johnson. This unusual Christmas meditation rewards careful study. Few of his poems refer directly to his sufferings in prison, yet many like this one deal with the paradox of love and pain, which is bound to be much on the mind of a martyr. After three years in prison, St. Robert Southwell was finally brought to trial on the capital crime of being a priest and Jesuit—not because of any new development in his case but because the government of Queen Elizabeth judged it expedient to execute a priest at that time. Sir Edward Coke, who has written with such eloquence about the law, conducted the prosecution of our saint with implacable viciousness. St. Robert's execution by hanging at Tyburn on February 21, 1595, attracted a large crowd which looked stupidly on at his departure from this world. Far otherwise were the heavenly hosts who beheld him that same day before the throne of God with his martyr's crown.
DR. MALCOLM BRENNAN is Professor of English at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. [Emphasis - The Catacombs]
|
|