Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2018 15:22:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 9, 2018 15:35:08 GMT
"And the truth will set you free..." John 8:32
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2018 14:15:06 GMT
I couldn't agree more.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2018 18:01:27 GMT
Others at Cathinfo are now chiming in and complaining about the lack of transparency of the False Resistance and commenting on the “caution” used in publicizing their sermons and conferences.
As someone said: “… why the secrecy when we are Catholic?”
And someone accurately answered: “He who speaks the Truth has nothing to fear and nothing to hide.”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2018 21:11:23 GMT
Others at Cathinfo are now chiming in and complaining about the lack of transparency of the False Resistance and commenting on the “caution” used in publicizing their sermons and conferences. As someone said: “… why the secrecy when we are Catholic?” And someone accurately answered: “He who speaks the Truth has nothing to fear and nothing to hide.” At least that is something the fake agree with us on. Now if only they can come to the doctrinal questions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2018 14:17:58 GMT
CI is having quite an examination in the last few days with some of the braver ones coming forward on the risk of being banned to show the ineptness of the fake bishops.
To keep them in line, one of their regulating enforcers just came out to pacify them to make a "False Resistance Directory", without consent from the "authority" (bishops). Is this another break in the ranks? No, just the paying faithful wanting more than the fake bishops wanting to give them.
The try is nice; but will the fake bishops comply when they demand secrecy? Look at Bishops Zendejas. Since being consecrated a bishop 9 months ago, no one knows what he is doing; where he is going to serve their people; no nothing. He does what he wants like a true vagabond bishop making up his own thing.
Notice after 5 years the "faithful" of the false resistance are having an identity problem? The top is plush, but the bottom faithful are always miffed. In recent days CI is bubbling over with distraughtnous about the top's dark secrecy.
And what do they have to show? At present, their "chapel directory" is empty. They are barren; no fruit. The people have to organize themselves; not their fake bishops. Of course. Yet the regulating enforcers among them still keeps the demoralizing contradictions wanting to be "united" in their trad-ecumenical brand at the same time to be "loose" demanded from their fake bishops. How is that catholic?
Shows to be another disagreement among them...morally detached from the fake bishops. Certainly they are not united among themselves in doctrine, they espouse all kinds of goulash contradicting each other. They are only united for the drive-thu secret sacraments they want to know more of. But their bosses do not. ONLY when it is convenient for the bosses to feed their caged "pay-pray-obey" faithful. How utopia, Christ in sacrament without Christ in faith.
Here's the narration from one of the regulation enforcers:
The false paradigm continues on to breed more distraughtnous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2018 15:05:13 GMT
That is the one of the fruits of that 'apostolate'. The laity have to do the organizing. It is more and more Protestanized. The laity take care of everything. It is not the proper hierarchy appointed by Our Lord Jesus Christ, where the bishops act like bishops and keep things running smoothly. No, the laity are the glue and the bishops appear to just randomly show up for confirmations in various locations throughout the year but that's it. No propagating the faith. Just sit in their homes, listening to Wagner and reciting Shakespeare. And perform a few confirmations to give the show of acting like bishops.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2018 15:52:06 GMT
So the bishops do nothing to unite but there are regulating enforcers to herd them? Too funny.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2018 14:40:49 GMT
As much as the plebs in the false resistance are complaining, there is no reprieve to give them from their fake bishops and priests. The top keeps a shadow governance all to their own. Funny how BW complains of the NWO and its secret societies when he created one of his own...against the will of the Church. Here is some of the shadowy secret stuff the fake bishops and priests try to suppress their people in secret sacraments, no recordings of sermons, lying to people and media... Secret Sacraments: Another held by Bishop Williamson"Faux Pas resistance": Darkness and secrecy!False resistance "contracts"Who is Fr. Gerardo Zendejas, the new Bishop Elect?Shadowy stuff! But why expect differently when the Fake bishops state their reason why - Bishop Williamson stated that he and the other bishops: But is it a surprise? No, his EC #513 "God’s Weapons", was of the SAME dread of indifferent. The secrecy of the false resistance will continue in mandate of their leaders -- quite cultist.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2018 15:47:42 GMT
And this is why there is so little effort from the false-fake resistance to reach souls. They have already decided that some souls are not worth saving. One could have said that Dismas, the good thief, also was not worth saving. It probably could have been said of him, that he just wouldn't have ears to hear. But where men are foolish, God is wise.
Would not Dismas be considered the weak of the world? A thief. A sinner. Dying a justified death for his crimes. Yet God, in His mercy shows an abundance of mercy to this man. And in his dying breaths, Dismas is saved. Perhaps Mary Magdalen would be considered worthy enough to hear their messages? By what yardstick do these bishops decide who 'has the ears to hear'?
What arrogance these bishops of the false-fake resistance display. Prejudging who is worthy of hearing 'their message'. And who is not. For shame! This is not the behavior of Catholic...anybody, much less the behavior of Catholic bishops. Are these true shepards? Searching for the one lost and leaving the ninety-nine? No. Unfortunately, these bishops are in comfortable, expensive homes. And the sheep are left to their own devices. With only a precious few within the inner circles privy to their 'efforts'.
Well, they can have those truly false bishops.
I have heard many people say, "Well, we need a bishop. We have to take Bishop Williamson. We can't not have a bishop." My reply is always: When are Catholic ever allowed to compromise for a title? That is a problem God alone can solve. Our only job is to remain faithful. God, in His Providence, will provide what we need, when we need it. And these times without a faithful bishop are surely a trial. A spiritual trial. And like Blessed Job, we must remain faithful. So that we can merit to hear the words:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2018 15:33:44 GMT
My “CI morning laughter” today comes from the thread titled, “Resistance Directory.” In it, Matthew is trying to justify why the false resistance doesn’t publish its Masses, bishop’s visits, sermons/conferences, etc. He says they have to be “discreet.” But in fact, everything in the false resistance has to be controlled or hidden because of all the errors they’re promoting. I bet Bishop Williamson’s followers often say to themselves: “Now if only there was a way to control those weekly incriminating Eleison Comments, since they always contain errors…." www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/resistance-directory-47660/15/
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2018 17:29:04 GMT
Matthew says: - Being forced to admit the elephant in the room - Bishop Williamson has "controversial positions".
- But, refuses to let them be declared on CI.
- Goes to every effort to distill and censor the narration.
And wants to call a Kettle Black, saying:
Ironic!
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 24, 2018 17:37:33 GMT
Have to love the fake vibs in the pews. Here is a CI cutie. ... Here's another - in a another attempt to propagate fake news in the last few days, the 'kind and charitable' folks at CI are falsely posturing that Fr. Pfeiffer is a supporter of Fr. Urrutigoity. But there are at least two sane voices in the 'babel' of that cesspool of calumny and falseness [re-formatted for clarity]: ignatius Newbie Posts: 19 Reputation: +20/-7 Gender: Male Re: Fr. Pfeiffer supports fr. Urrutigoity -- yep« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2018, 04:47:00 PM » Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant on February 15, 2018, 11:10:05 AM To whom did Fr P make these comments? Are they in one of his Youtube sermons?
Quote from: Fanny on Thu Feb 15 2018 I am not at liberty to reveal, but I heard it from 2 people who are very close to Fr. Pfeiffer.____________________________________________________________________ Are we back to allegations again? Can you please provide anything verifiable? Every time I visit CI there's another title based on hearsay. ++++ And another breath of fresh air from today: Unbrandable Newbie* Posts: 89 Reputation: +192/-1 Gender: Male Re: Fr. Pfeiffer supports fr. Urrutigoity -- yep« Reply #19 on: Today at 08:01:46 AM » Quote from: Fanny on February 14, 2018, 05:42:56 PM For anyone still doubting whether or not fr. Pfeiffer and OLMC is quickly becoming SSJ, part 2, I encourage you to ask fr. Pfeiffer his opinion of fr. Urrutigoity.
He recently made comments which support fr. Urrutigoity, saying fr. U is not a pervert and because he has not been convicted of anything, in the lay legal system, fr. U is innocent.For the record, we just spoke to Fr. Pfeiffer a few hours ago, in person, and he does not think this about Fr. Urrutigoity. Your statements are false. Good luck picking up all the feathers you spread. A woman once went for confession, accusing herself badmouthing people. The confessor, a wise old man, listened lovingly, absolved her and gave her a strange penance. He told her to go home, get a hen and come back, plucking the bird’s feathers as she walked along the street.
When she had returned to him he said: “Now go back home and, as you go, pick up each feather that you plucked on the way.” The woman told him that it would be impossible since the wind had almost certainly blown them away in the meantime.
And the confessor told her “You see, just as it is impossible to pick up the feathers once the wind has scattered them, it is likewise impossible to gather gossip and calumnies back up once they have come out of our mouth.”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2018 22:22:20 GMT
On CI, Matthew deleted the above post about Fr. Pfeiffer that cleared his name.
Matthew is allowing and supporting calumny on his website. He is obstructing truth, justice, and charity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2018 0:38:20 GMT
On CI, Matthew deleted the above post about Fr. Pfeiffer that cleared his name. Matthew is allowing and supporting calumny on his website. He is obstructing truth, justice, and charity. Reminds me of Herod not caring about substance only miracles. Before
After
|
|