Seven Bishops: the Pontius Pilate of Tradition
Jan 14, 2018 16:44:43 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2018 16:44:43 GMT
What is truth?
Those are the infamous words of Pontius Pilate to our Lord when confronted between a mob of indifferentism and Truth Himself. What Pilate did next foreshadows every leader placed by God to serve His people. Either they will be saints or persecutors of the Church.
Where are the seven bishops in Tradition? What do they stand for? Whom do they serve: the mob or Him who is Truth?
We already know to whom the three bishops in the neo-sspx serve -- all things conciliarism. But to whom do the other four bishops serve?
Placated in controversy, the four false resistance bishops promote "Universal salvation" as a guide for their followers. They offer all three platforms of traditionalism, conservatism, and liberalism playing a theme for every like and every whim. All to all -- giving the same equal footing for evil and truth.
Bishop Faure's new "Priestly Society of the Apostles of Jesus and Mary" (SAJM) adds to the confusion promoting both models of social structure: one of a "loose network of independent priests", and its opposite, one for something of an organization. It is like offering a liberal cake and a conservative cake for their followers.
The same goes for their doctrinal side promoting for opposite sides of the faith. They offer freedom to go to the revolutionary novus ordo mass, believe in its pastoral mission for its conservative priests, believe in its false "miracles", they believe in the conciliar church, they grow sedevacantism in their missions, promote indifferentism not needing to convert others, believe the Traditional movement is "outside" the Catholic Church, graft conciliarism, they fail to make necessary distinctions, they defend their errors, promote condemned books, the list goes on... While also saying the opposite, they stand for what Archbishop Lefebvre stood for.
You cannot have it both ways!
That's the point, they do want it both ways. Polar opposites -- as confusing as that continues to be with them in these five years. It is all a part of the "Wanna-be Soup" offering move flavors to their trad-ecumenical followers than Baskin' Robins does with ice cream.
They also have a moral side and a political side of opposites too. They have set up in their moral side a precedent to say two different things and claim they are both right -- when it suits them. Situation ethics is the more common word. But modernism is the parent word.
Bishop Williamson fosters the policy of entwining the objective with the subjective keeping liberals around him in hundreds and Catholics who follow the voice of the Good Shepherd at a great distance.
The Political side is all to clear once you put their pieces together they scattered like weeds in the garden of the Church. They first cower trying to hide away from the NWO, the sky is going to fall, giving reason why Bishop Williamson consecrated Bishop Faure and proved the SAJM was set up as a political tool to bring in any conservative sspx priest who wants to leave the sspx in a easy transition wanting structure. However, they too see the sham of the Faux-pas all too clear seeing the Fake resistance bishops offering more modernism that Bishop Fellay is doing.
It all comes down to the teaching of these Fake resistance bishops and what they stand for.
Where are the Four Marks of the Catholic Church: One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolate? Where are those Marks of Christ in these bishops? Are they present in the teaching and mission of so and so bishop and so and so priest? Where are the Four Marks of the Church in the neo-sspx and the false resistance? Are they present? Obviously not.
Truly, it is making parts out of God to please the itching ears of their followers. But where is Christ in all of this?
If you ask that question, you will be CRUSHED and scorned by the fake resistance and suppressed by Bishop Fellay in the neo with a heavy hand. What then are the Catholic people in tradition fed with by these renegade bishops? All seven bishops give opposite extremes: either the far right (neo-sspx), or the choice of the far left (false resistance). So much for the Catholicism of the Cross.
For those who can see and hear, we'll keep the joy of the Cross our Lord blessed and gave fruit the great Archbishop Lefebvre handed down from his predecessors that gives life and truth which will set you free.
Those are the infamous words of Pontius Pilate to our Lord when confronted between a mob of indifferentism and Truth Himself. What Pilate did next foreshadows every leader placed by God to serve His people. Either they will be saints or persecutors of the Church.
Where are the seven bishops in Tradition? What do they stand for? Whom do they serve: the mob or Him who is Truth?
We already know to whom the three bishops in the neo-sspx serve -- all things conciliarism. But to whom do the other four bishops serve?
Placated in controversy, the four false resistance bishops promote "Universal salvation" as a guide for their followers. They offer all three platforms of traditionalism, conservatism, and liberalism playing a theme for every like and every whim. All to all -- giving the same equal footing for evil and truth.
Bishop Faure's new "Priestly Society of the Apostles of Jesus and Mary" (SAJM) adds to the confusion promoting both models of social structure: one of a "loose network of independent priests", and its opposite, one for something of an organization. It is like offering a liberal cake and a conservative cake for their followers.
The same goes for their doctrinal side promoting for opposite sides of the faith. They offer freedom to go to the revolutionary novus ordo mass, believe in its pastoral mission for its conservative priests, believe in its false "miracles", they believe in the conciliar church, they grow sedevacantism in their missions, promote indifferentism not needing to convert others, believe the Traditional movement is "outside" the Catholic Church, graft conciliarism, they fail to make necessary distinctions, they defend their errors, promote condemned books, the list goes on... While also saying the opposite, they stand for what Archbishop Lefebvre stood for.
You cannot have it both ways!
That's the point, they do want it both ways. Polar opposites -- as confusing as that continues to be with them in these five years. It is all a part of the "Wanna-be Soup" offering move flavors to their trad-ecumenical followers than Baskin' Robins does with ice cream.
They also have a moral side and a political side of opposites too. They have set up in their moral side a precedent to say two different things and claim they are both right -- when it suits them. Situation ethics is the more common word. But modernism is the parent word.
Bishop Williamson fosters the policy of entwining the objective with the subjective keeping liberals around him in hundreds and Catholics who follow the voice of the Good Shepherd at a great distance.
The Political side is all to clear once you put their pieces together they scattered like weeds in the garden of the Church. They first cower trying to hide away from the NWO, the sky is going to fall, giving reason why Bishop Williamson consecrated Bishop Faure and proved the SAJM was set up as a political tool to bring in any conservative sspx priest who wants to leave the sspx in a easy transition wanting structure. However, they too see the sham of the Faux-pas all too clear seeing the Fake resistance bishops offering more modernism that Bishop Fellay is doing.
It all comes down to the teaching of these Fake resistance bishops and what they stand for.
Where are the Four Marks of the Catholic Church: One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolate? Where are those Marks of Christ in these bishops? Are they present in the teaching and mission of so and so bishop and so and so priest? Where are the Four Marks of the Church in the neo-sspx and the false resistance? Are they present? Obviously not.
Truly, it is making parts out of God to please the itching ears of their followers. But where is Christ in all of this?
If you ask that question, you will be CRUSHED and scorned by the fake resistance and suppressed by Bishop Fellay in the neo with a heavy hand. What then are the Catholic people in tradition fed with by these renegade bishops? All seven bishops give opposite extremes: either the far right (neo-sspx), or the choice of the far left (false resistance). So much for the Catholicism of the Cross.
For those who can see and hear, we'll keep the joy of the Cross our Lord blessed and gave fruit the great Archbishop Lefebvre handed down from his predecessors that gives life and truth which will set you free.
