The "Great Replacement" is only a conspiracy theory ...

The words of the cardinal, born in Guinea-Conakri in West Africa, are especially courageous since dignitaries of the Church, including Pope Francis, have spoken in favor of mass immigration to Europe citing passages from the Gospel and implying that whoever opposes He is a good Christian, or worse.

Sarah knows well that these contemporary migrations do not benefit emigrants, much less the countries that receive them.



What are the consequences and cui bono? Who benefits from this?
It could be seen that in addition to Islam, those who benefit are globalist and anti-Christian interests in general, or at least that is what they want, and have long desired.

Le Grand Remplacement

The Great Replacement is the gradual and orchestrated genocide of European and Christian peoples is their ancestral lands through African, Asian and Muslim immigrants.

The foundations of the Great Replacement were developed by the so-called Frankfurt school in the 1930s. Today after a long march on institutions, often violent [1] , his disciples have taken over the mainstream media and universities, and come down incessantly line. They use the fallacy of matching love for people with "hatred" for the rest . But this is required only for European Christian nations, showing that it is but a dishonest tactic of domination.

Curiously, it was Renaud Camus, a left-wing homosexual, who coined the concept of "Le Grand Remplacement" surely when observing the events in his native France, or perhaps inspired by the prophetic novel "Le Camp des Saints" by his compatriot Jean Raspail. His definition of the Great Replacement is simple "There is a group of people, and in the course of a generation there ends up being a different group of people."





Squared hypocrisy

Well, actually when the Great Replacement is not denied, it is celebrated, even by the same means that deny it. Intellectual honesty was never his strong point. The New York Times again , but this time applauding the replacement:
The New York Times editorialists cannot decide even if the Great Replacement is a conspiracy theory, or is it real and must be celebrated.

Beyond the big media and its double standards, hatred of Christianity, Europe and its derivatives extends to a diverse spectrum of people. And when they expand they show the hilacha. For example:





What will this diverse group of subjects have in common?

On the one hand, those who mention and oppose the replacement are branded as conspirators. On the other hand it is celebrated that the replacement is happening as something good, desirable and fair. They were? Who to believe? The arrogant liberals who deny the replacement, or the left-handed and other resentful people who celebrate it? In vino veritas, and in the names too: Mohamed occupies first place for the first time in the twenty most popular names in France. The Name of the Prophet was the first name given in England and Wales in 2015. Mohammed was the first male name of Oslo in 2014. In Berlin in 2018, the name most given to children was Mohammed. In the US things are not much better .

Et you , UN?

And what will the United Nations say to all this? Considering that the UN definitions of genocide include "deliberately inflicting on a group calculated living conditions in order to cause their total or partial physical destruction", they will surely oppose replacement as any genocide. Do not? Not precisely…

At the beginning of 2017, the Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs published a report entitled “Replacement Migrations: A Solution to the Reduction and Aging of Populations?". The term “replacement migrations” is used to define the level of international migration necessary in each country to avoid the decline and aging of the population that results from low fertility and mortality rates.



Action and reaction

This invasion has caused huge problems in European nations . Not only economic and cultural. In England, massive rapes of English girls by Muslim gangs in Rotherham , Rochdale and Telford occurred (and occur). Scandals that both the government and the English press have tried to cover, reaching up to imprisoned parents of raped girls accusing them of "racists."

These abuses have generated such rage among the native population, that the media have hidden or presented negatively when they were forced to report them. However, people have expressed themselves clearly at the polls . In Western Europe, the election of Salvini in Italy , Brexit , the high percentages that Le Pen receives in France, Alternative for Germany, the Democrats of Sweden and the Forum for Democracy in the Netherlands, among others. Not to mention in Eastern Europe where governments defending local culture and religion and contrary to moral degeneration and mass Muslim immigration have settled in Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic. The triumphs of Trump and Bolsonaro are another manifestation of the same phenomenon in the Americas.

There have also been isolated but violent reactions from desperate people to the outrage and complicity they see within their own governments. The attacks in Norway (Utoya, 2011), and more recently in New Zealand (Christchurch) and the US (El Paso) come to the case [2] .

French young people peacefully demonstrate in opposition to France being replaced. But the state fines them and tries to put them in prison. Source


The popular Hungarian leader, Viktor Orbán, who certainly fulfills the supreme role of the statesman in providing against preventable evils, is perfectly aware of the Great Replacement and has already put several mechanisms in place to preserve Hungary. In the recent international meeting on demography in Budapest (which the media hid or denigrated), which was attended by leaders of the region and delegations from many countries, Orbán said:
Hungary's response to the Great Replacement is a strong pro-family policy, the opposite of fostering mass immigration of incompatible and hostile people to the local culture and religion that anti-Christian elites are implementing in Western Europe. Birth in Hungary is already increasing thanks to the policies of his government. Other countries in Eastern Europe are on the same path, which infuriates abortionist anti-Christian globalists, who despite all their shame seem to hate well-understood diversity.

The reason why it is necessary to preserve the diversity and identity of each nation is reminded of the extraordinary Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in his acceptance speech for the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1970:

An inconvenient question (and racist)

But if certain countries such as Israel and Saudi Arabia can be defined by a very specific ethnic-religious majority, not at all "diverse", and boast about it, why can't European countries aspire to the same? Why are these countries, and only these , demanded to open their doors to mass immigration? Why have Saudi Arabia and the rich Gulf countries not received any Muslim immigrants from Syria and other countries in the region?

The much promoted "diversity" is a euphemism for the replacement and destruction of Europe. Opposing this forced "diversity" is cataloged as "hate language." But Cardinal Sarah is right: God does not change his mind ... and as Cardinal Burke recalls, a world government is neither fair nor legitimate, to the point that the Lord of the nations has always shown his disgust in the face of babble attempts to form a new world order.

It's just like that ... God opposes homogenizing globalization, so ... not to lose hope.

Don't be told ...

- Enrique de Zwart

9/5/2019

[1] The number of executed in France in the political-cultural purges after the second war is around 50 thousand. Today the so-called "antifa", groups of criminals financed by billionaires such as Soros, play a similar role intimidating and attacking anyone who opposes the globalizing interests of their financiers.

[2] The attacks on the right have so far been few. Apart from the multiple attacks by Muslim terrorists, there have also been several attacks by leftist extremists that are not brought to the forefront by the media. Recently, in Dayton, Ohio, that although it happened a few days after the attack in El Paso received much less attention, because the attacker, being a sympathizer of the Democratic party , had the "wrong" profile.