Fulton Sheen is anti-SSPX

Matt, thanks for your comments.  In the latter days Bishop Sheen was all Vatican II as you say, and promoted modernism, which we do not support.  However, the particular conferences and sermons from him in the earlier years are orthodox.  Which is why we have them for edification.  If the standard was to throw out all content what is of God in a person's fidelity because his latter years were of digression, by what heritage does the Church have to show the power of God's grace through sinners?

For example,  Bishop Fellay today is a liberal seeking modernism which we do not support.  However, his prior content was orthodox and is worthy to listen to.  The same with Bishop Williamson.  Today he seeks a liberal agenda.  Do we print his stuff today full of errors?  No.  Only his past which was solid with orthodoxy.  Then, he was a Dino; today, he is a liberal mouse.

So if a person, priest, bishop is faithful for decades unto God and succumbs to self in the latter, does the good they do prior not have merit?

Judas did good work and manifested miracles our Lord allowed the apostles to make, are the works of Judas prior to his betrayal not good anymore?  Should the miracles be retracted and the lame return to be lame?  Should those goods of God through Judas not be recorded and praised for the grace through him of that time he manifested a great faith to perform those miracles?

So it is in this balance recognizing what God is doing; not what men do.

With that said, it is the prior Catholic work we recognize of Bishop Sheen; not his person, and not his latter years.  Hopefully he found the mercy of God at the end of his life and saved his soul.

What a great and enlightening answer, thank you.