Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2018 19:48:03 GMT
( from the article, “Subversion,” in Le Chardonnet, June 2009) Archbishop Lefebvre: model against subversion
Providentially, Archbishop Lefebvre knew how to respond to subversion within the Church thanks to personal assets: - a tried virtue which sheltered him from a careerist spirit - a solid spirit of faith which protected him from the “songs of the mermaids” of modernism - a clear, simple, strong preaching which marked minds and avoided confusion or the misappropriation of his words - a long experience with the Roman Curia which immunized him against the snares of Vatican diplomacy - a tenacity and a Christian optimism which kept him from all defeatism or irenicism* - a practical sense which allowed him to effectively fight against disorder These effective measures were the adequate response to subversion: - against the destruction of the clerical elite, the solid formation of true priests and the foundation of schools and colleges - against the fragmentation of individuals (priests and faithful), the creation of the Society and the establishment of priories and associations grouping together isolated forces Let us finally add that at the height of this crisis of authority that the Church experienced, his personal sanctity as well as his competence made him – against his will - the providential leader capable of uniting Catholic resistance, and bringing to this order, a proud fortification erected against subversion. Source: laportelatine.org/district/prieure/stnicol/Chardonnet/Chard249.pdf * " irenicism" in Christian theology refers to attempts to unify Christian apologetical systems by using reason as an essential attribute. (from Wikipedia)
|
|