Menzingen throws more Egg on Face
May 2, 2018 5:42:47 GMT
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2018 5:42:47 GMT
In another blatant affront, Fr. Michel Simoulin, fsspx wrote another article on the heels of his last crusade to go conciliar with the same agenda of 2012 -- lie to their followers in plain terms. At least he gives disclosure what they are doing twisted as it is.
In reading just the first few paragraphs, one wonders why Menzingen allows this liberal trash to be disseminated publicly and yet they punish their faithful priests who are truly sons of the Church.
This is another program to dull the catholic senses instilling a mind set of schizophrenia!
[Emphasis mine and blue with my remarks.]
In reading just the first few paragraphs, one wonders why Menzingen allows this liberal trash to be disseminated publicly and yet they punish their faithful priests who are truly sons of the Church.
This is another program to dull the catholic senses instilling a mind set of schizophrenia!
[Emphasis mine and blue with my remarks.]
Source - Tradinews
[Father Michel Simoulin, fsspx - The Seignadou] Chernobyl
SOURCE - The Seignadou - May 2018
Comparison is not right. In April 2017, we received the document by which Mgr Planet grants to the priests of the Fraternity the faculty of celebrating marriages in his diocese. What did you have to do? if I believe some good advisers, it should have returned his text! We did not do it because it would have meant a rejection of his authority.
Last December, I celebrated in a parish of another diocese a marriage with the delegation received from the bishop and the priest ... I prepared the spouses myself and established the file that I transmitted to the diocese ... I received the consents of the spouses and celebrated the Mass in the presence of the parish priest who registered the marriage in the parish registers ... The most interesting is that, in 1984, I had received the consent of the parents of the fiancée in another parish, under the same conditions! Incorrigible recidivist, I do not repent! On the contrary, I am ready to start again!
In fact, at this wedding, at no time was I subjected to any "conciliar" influence whatsoever, and it seems to me that I did not suffer any contamination of it, nor to have submitted the spouses to any contamination whatsoever! I am the same after, as before, always faithful to the wise counsel of Mgr. Lefebvre who, between us, spoke more often of the official Church than of the conciliar Church. He did not like that term. [Wrong! before was adamantly expressed to follow Eternal Rome and Her perennial teaching through the valid and legal 1917 Code of Canon law; after Fr. Simoulin, you accept the conciliar teaching of marriage and follow its ecumenical designed 1983 Code of Canon law. But the game for you is to say otherwise, to make both the one and the same, clever, but lacking the spirit of God. ]
It is true that when a nuclear explosion occurs, no one can be safe, big or small, strong or weak, healthy or sick ... all are affected: pulverized or contaminated! But if we compare the Second Vatican Council to such an explosion, should we not avoid some exaggeration in the image used? (sic) Because it does not go in the spiritual order as in the material or physical order! Thanks to God, the life of the spirit does not meet the same criteria as the life of the body. [Of course it does; and more. The soul can be just as sick and really dead (in sin) while the body is healthy and alive! Read the Catholic Catechism what is the nature and workings of the soul; o'liberal priest.] And it is precisely that during the conciliar explosion, some were neither pulverized nor contaminated: the contamination was not universal! [sic] When it acts on the body, no one can protect itself from it! But when it comes to souls, its effect is not inevitable, and well-born souls, well armed with traditional "antibodies", who feed on them, live on them and protect themselves with caution, have nothing to to fear this conciliar radioactivity! [What presumption and pride!] Thus certain bishops whom we know well have resisted and even transmitted to us the antibodies which have preserved us and still preserve us from yielding to the conciliar facilities. [Who? Name one still alive.]
No doubt the danger exists, and we know many confreres, friendly congregations, faithful who have been seduced, and have been contaminated. But how did that happen? Weariness of the fight? discouragement? ambition ? misunderstanding of our position of loyalty to Rome in accordance with the declaration of 21 November 1974? Deus scit! [Why is it with him when he introduces a progressive way to go forward he invokes the past as being the same when it is diametrically opposed in spirit and law?]
While we must be careful, but I still say that we should not be afraid of this radioactivity [Say that standing in front of a lion. If that is ok, then why does 1 Peter 5 says the devil is like the same and one SHOULD be afraid? Presumption again?!] against which we protect ourselves thanks to Archbishop Lefebvre for almost 50 years without being reached! Deo Gratias!
What reassures me is that Monseigneur himself has not been spared by such reproaches. I remember a pamphlet written on July 1, 1980 entitled: "RALLIONS US: THE EXAMPLE COMES FROM ABOVE". The article was signed (at the time, the franchise still existed!) And the easiest will be to read it or read again:
"On Monday, June 30, 1980, the knell rings at Notre-Dame des Anges church in Tourcoing (North). These are the funerals of Mrs. Monique LEFEBVRE, beloved of the famous prelate Monseigneur LEFEBVRE.
The clergy come out of the sacristy and go home to the deceased. With the exception of choirboys, there is in the procession a priest in "Taizé outfit", that is to say with a white dawn, without cord, - but with a hood. For the occasion, he spent a violet stole of modern cut. Behind him, the celebrant - with a purple chasuble. Certainly, black, the color of mourning is no longer done in the post-conciliar church: we must evacuate what reminds us of death and the afterlife. And, oh surprise! arrives the prelate of Ecône, black cassock, surplice of lace, camail and purple cap, pectoral cross. He is surrounded by two men of his, the abbots SIMOULIN and FERRIE in cassocks and surplices. [NB I had just been ordained to the subdiaconate on June 27]. Really curious, we were not used to seeing Monsignor in so progressive a company and moreover in a church reserved for the new rite; the village halls and hangars were more familiar to him.
It is to the sound of the Requiem in Latin that the procession goes up the central nave. The local clergy moved to the microphones, the three guests climbed into the carved stalls, two steps away from the table turned proudly facing the people. The ritual begins. We receive you in the name of the God of Hope, a member of the family comes to read a text, we sing a Kyrie, an Alleluia precedes the Gospel. The prelate, very dignified, follows the course of a ceremony that should not be in his missal. It is signed on the forehead, the lips, the chest, proof of its participation in the modernist cult.
The sermon, in which the priest tuts the deceased, teaches us a great deal about his earthly life. It does not touch the eternity or rather, assures us of a serene future. Purgatory, Hell, Paradise, where did you go? After an offering in which about five hundred people come to kiss Christ and lay down an obole for future Masses, we attend the famous universal prayer. A young girl, apparently from the family, comes to us to read some intentions, one of which was particularly crisp and almost like this: "Pray for the unity of the Church in the diversity of expressions". A refrain punctuated the intentions. With the beginning of the Offertory, the prelate removes his cap and prepares to attend the following events. After a beautiful Latin Sanctus, begins a very French consecration. The three people in the stalls kneel at the approach of the sacrifice, the altar boys and the priest "Taizé way" can not do less; the faithful remain standing. The words of the consecration arrive after a few short sentences, the priest only makes a slight inclination of the head, the lady responsible for blackmail the faithful comes to offer us a chorus. It is only before the Pater that Monseigneur and the two abbots get up again. So they attended actively and collected at a new mass called Paul VI.
Time is running out, at communion, a good sister is given a ciborium to activate the distribution. Everyone standing, but you have the choice between the hand or the language. A few more words, a prayer and the first part ends. It was then that Monseigneur, assisted by his two faithful abbots, came back with purple caps on his back, bent over his head. He will make the absentee according to the Catholic rite. Finally, a little song in honor of the Virgin "The Lord did wonders for me" and the "in paradise" to prove that we love traditions and Latin.
Monseigneur had to attend a Mass of Luther, even for the funeral of his beautiful heart, should he participate actively?
What should the young priests, ordained for the maintenance of the Holy Mass, think of seeing the patron spinning in the shop opposite? For a prelate, for a person whose moral responsibilities are enormous, for an example to thousands of Catholics, can there be particular cases?
And tomorrow the simple believer will be able to go to both the synaxis and the Holy Sacrifice since ... the example comes from above. "
As for us, we came out of the ceremony as we were when we entered, and Monseigneur does not seem to me to have been contaminated! I would even say that this kind of ceremony can only immunize you even more against any conciliar contamination! In the car that brought us back, Monseigneur was joking about his sister Jeanne, a religious nun, asking her: "So, Jeanne, when did you convert?" (while giving us a wicked nod!)
I will not say more, and that will be my ultimate conclusion! May the Immaculate Heart of our Good Mother keep us all united and faithful to the spirit of our founder.
"We adhere with all our heart, with all our soul, to Catholic Rome, guardian of the Catholic faith and the traditions necessary for the maintenance of this faith, to eternal Rome, mistress of wisdom and truth.
On the other hand, we refuse and have always refused to follow the Rome of neo-modernist and neo-Protestant tendency, which manifested itself clearly in the Second Vatican Council and after the Council in all the reforms that resulted from it. "
[Father Michel Simoulin, fsspx - The Seignadou] Chernobyl
SOURCE - The Seignadou - May 2018
Comparison is not right. In April 2017, we received the document by which Mgr Planet grants to the priests of the Fraternity the faculty of celebrating marriages in his diocese. What did you have to do? if I believe some good advisers, it should have returned his text! We did not do it because it would have meant a rejection of his authority.
Last December, I celebrated in a parish of another diocese a marriage with the delegation received from the bishop and the priest ... I prepared the spouses myself and established the file that I transmitted to the diocese ... I received the consents of the spouses and celebrated the Mass in the presence of the parish priest who registered the marriage in the parish registers ... The most interesting is that, in 1984, I had received the consent of the parents of the fiancée in another parish, under the same conditions! Incorrigible recidivist, I do not repent! On the contrary, I am ready to start again!
In fact, at this wedding, at no time was I subjected to any "conciliar" influence whatsoever, and it seems to me that I did not suffer any contamination of it, nor to have submitted the spouses to any contamination whatsoever! I am the same after, as before, always faithful to the wise counsel of Mgr. Lefebvre who, between us, spoke more often of the official Church than of the conciliar Church. He did not like that term. [Wrong! before was adamantly expressed to follow Eternal Rome and Her perennial teaching through the valid and legal 1917 Code of Canon law; after Fr. Simoulin, you accept the conciliar teaching of marriage and follow its ecumenical designed 1983 Code of Canon law. But the game for you is to say otherwise, to make both the one and the same, clever, but lacking the spirit of God. ]
It is true that when a nuclear explosion occurs, no one can be safe, big or small, strong or weak, healthy or sick ... all are affected: pulverized or contaminated! But if we compare the Second Vatican Council to such an explosion, should we not avoid some exaggeration in the image used? (sic) Because it does not go in the spiritual order as in the material or physical order! Thanks to God, the life of the spirit does not meet the same criteria as the life of the body. [Of course it does; and more. The soul can be just as sick and really dead (in sin) while the body is healthy and alive! Read the Catholic Catechism what is the nature and workings of the soul; o'liberal priest.] And it is precisely that during the conciliar explosion, some were neither pulverized nor contaminated: the contamination was not universal! [sic] When it acts on the body, no one can protect itself from it! But when it comes to souls, its effect is not inevitable, and well-born souls, well armed with traditional "antibodies", who feed on them, live on them and protect themselves with caution, have nothing to to fear this conciliar radioactivity! [What presumption and pride!] Thus certain bishops whom we know well have resisted and even transmitted to us the antibodies which have preserved us and still preserve us from yielding to the conciliar facilities. [Who? Name one still alive.]
No doubt the danger exists, and we know many confreres, friendly congregations, faithful who have been seduced, and have been contaminated. But how did that happen? Weariness of the fight? discouragement? ambition ? misunderstanding of our position of loyalty to Rome in accordance with the declaration of 21 November 1974? Deus scit! [Why is it with him when he introduces a progressive way to go forward he invokes the past as being the same when it is diametrically opposed in spirit and law?]
While we must be careful, but I still say that we should not be afraid of this radioactivity [Say that standing in front of a lion. If that is ok, then why does 1 Peter 5 says the devil is like the same and one SHOULD be afraid? Presumption again?!] against which we protect ourselves thanks to Archbishop Lefebvre for almost 50 years without being reached! Deo Gratias!
What reassures me is that Monseigneur himself has not been spared by such reproaches. I remember a pamphlet written on July 1, 1980 entitled: "RALLIONS US: THE EXAMPLE COMES FROM ABOVE". The article was signed (at the time, the franchise still existed!) And the easiest will be to read it or read again:
"On Monday, June 30, 1980, the knell rings at Notre-Dame des Anges church in Tourcoing (North). These are the funerals of Mrs. Monique LEFEBVRE, beloved of the famous prelate Monseigneur LEFEBVRE.
The clergy come out of the sacristy and go home to the deceased. With the exception of choirboys, there is in the procession a priest in "Taizé outfit", that is to say with a white dawn, without cord, - but with a hood. For the occasion, he spent a violet stole of modern cut. Behind him, the celebrant - with a purple chasuble. Certainly, black, the color of mourning is no longer done in the post-conciliar church: we must evacuate what reminds us of death and the afterlife. And, oh surprise! arrives the prelate of Ecône, black cassock, surplice of lace, camail and purple cap, pectoral cross. He is surrounded by two men of his, the abbots SIMOULIN and FERRIE in cassocks and surplices. [NB I had just been ordained to the subdiaconate on June 27]. Really curious, we were not used to seeing Monsignor in so progressive a company and moreover in a church reserved for the new rite; the village halls and hangars were more familiar to him.
It is to the sound of the Requiem in Latin that the procession goes up the central nave. The local clergy moved to the microphones, the three guests climbed into the carved stalls, two steps away from the table turned proudly facing the people. The ritual begins. We receive you in the name of the God of Hope, a member of the family comes to read a text, we sing a Kyrie, an Alleluia precedes the Gospel. The prelate, very dignified, follows the course of a ceremony that should not be in his missal. It is signed on the forehead, the lips, the chest, proof of its participation in the modernist cult.
The sermon, in which the priest tuts the deceased, teaches us a great deal about his earthly life. It does not touch the eternity or rather, assures us of a serene future. Purgatory, Hell, Paradise, where did you go? After an offering in which about five hundred people come to kiss Christ and lay down an obole for future Masses, we attend the famous universal prayer. A young girl, apparently from the family, comes to us to read some intentions, one of which was particularly crisp and almost like this: "Pray for the unity of the Church in the diversity of expressions". A refrain punctuated the intentions. With the beginning of the Offertory, the prelate removes his cap and prepares to attend the following events. After a beautiful Latin Sanctus, begins a very French consecration. The three people in the stalls kneel at the approach of the sacrifice, the altar boys and the priest "Taizé way" can not do less; the faithful remain standing. The words of the consecration arrive after a few short sentences, the priest only makes a slight inclination of the head, the lady responsible for blackmail the faithful comes to offer us a chorus. It is only before the Pater that Monseigneur and the two abbots get up again. So they attended actively and collected at a new mass called Paul VI.
Time is running out, at communion, a good sister is given a ciborium to activate the distribution. Everyone standing, but you have the choice between the hand or the language. A few more words, a prayer and the first part ends. It was then that Monseigneur, assisted by his two faithful abbots, came back with purple caps on his back, bent over his head. He will make the absentee according to the Catholic rite. Finally, a little song in honor of the Virgin "The Lord did wonders for me" and the "in paradise" to prove that we love traditions and Latin.
Monseigneur had to attend a Mass of Luther, even for the funeral of his beautiful heart, should he participate actively?
What should the young priests, ordained for the maintenance of the Holy Mass, think of seeing the patron spinning in the shop opposite? For a prelate, for a person whose moral responsibilities are enormous, for an example to thousands of Catholics, can there be particular cases?
And tomorrow the simple believer will be able to go to both the synaxis and the Holy Sacrifice since ... the example comes from above. "
As for us, we came out of the ceremony as we were when we entered, and Monseigneur does not seem to me to have been contaminated! I would even say that this kind of ceremony can only immunize you even more against any conciliar contamination! In the car that brought us back, Monseigneur was joking about his sister Jeanne, a religious nun, asking her: "So, Jeanne, when did you convert?" (while giving us a wicked nod!)
I will not say more, and that will be my ultimate conclusion! May the Immaculate Heart of our Good Mother keep us all united and faithful to the spirit of our founder.
"We adhere with all our heart, with all our soul, to Catholic Rome, guardian of the Catholic faith and the traditions necessary for the maintenance of this faith, to eternal Rome, mistress of wisdom and truth.
On the other hand, we refuse and have always refused to follow the Rome of neo-modernist and neo-Protestant tendency, which manifested itself clearly in the Second Vatican Council and after the Council in all the reforms that resulted from it. "