Eleison Comments #570: Rome Prepares - > More Hypocrisy?
Jun 16, 2018 23:15:43 GMT
Post by Admin on Jun 16, 2018 23:15:43 GMT
Bishop Williamson Eleison Comments - June 16, 2018
Rome Prepares?
Number DLXX (570)
How can someone pretend there is no fight
For the Faith? What else can be our present plight?
In the context of the crisis engulfing the Catholic Church for the last half-century since Vatican II (1962–1965), two recent moves of the Church authorities in Rome can seem surprising, because both moves seem to favour that Catholic Tradition which Pope Francis gives so many indications of wishing to uproot once and for all. Is the Big Bad Wolf really wanting to be nice to the Little Red Riding Hood of the Society of St Pius X, or are these another two wily moves to trap her in his Conciliar lair? Is Rome also preparing for the Society’s General Chapter in mid-July?
The first of the two moves was in mid-February of this year when the Ecclesia Dei Commission, launched in Rome in 1988 to slow down Catholic Tradition because it was threatening to speed up, granted to the semi-Traditional Fraternity of St Peter the use of the highly Traditional liturgical rites of Holy Week. These are the rites that were used for centuries and centuries prior to that reform of the liturgy by Cardinal Bugnini in the 1950’s which paved the way for the New Mass in the 1960’s. As rites for Holy Week the old rites are becoming more and more popular with Catholics who repudiate the New Mass, because the new rites contain so many features of that modernist liturgy which Paul VI would impose by deceitful trickery on the Universal Church in 1969. Is Rome at last backing away from the New Mass?
Hardly. As the famous line of Virgil runs, “Whatever it may be, I do not trust the Greeks, even when they bear gifts.” This gift to Tradition can easily have been designed by Rome to persuade all kinds of Little Red Riding Hoods, especially participants in the General Chapter of July, that the Big Bad Wolf is not so bad after all. The Chapter is important to Rome – that bastion of the Faith erected by the Archbishop must be dismantled, because by Archbishop Lefebvre’s true fight for the Faith it was a real road-block for the onward march of the New World Order, out of all proportion to the Society’s size. The fight has been severely weakened since his death, but Rome must fear the Chapter reviving it. Rome wants either another liberal as Superior General, or a compromise candidate will do, but not a fighter for the Faith!
The other surprising move of Rome was on May 16, when a well-known Vatican journalist, Andrea Tornielli, highlighted an extract from a recently appeared book written by a Roman official on Pope Paul VI (1963–1978). The extract is a detailed account of the September 1976 conversation held between the Pope and Archbishop Lefebvre, within two months of the Mass celebrated by the Archbishop in front of a huge crowd in Lisle, France. That Mass marked the beginning of the Traditional movement, so the Pope wanted to rein in the Archbishop. The conversation lasting a little over half an hour was noted down by the Romans at that time, and it was described somewhat differ ently by the Archbishop afterwards, but the Romans kept the contents to themselves for the last 42 years. Why publish them now?
The answer must lie in the “somewhat differently.” The admirable Internet site from Latin America, Non possumus, has published the details now released by the Romans and the Archbishop’s own account of the conversation alongside one another. Readers of Non possumus can check for themselves how the Romans have whitewashed the blindness of Paul VI and their own villainy. Outstanding example: Paul VI accused the Archbishop of making his seminarians swear an oath against the Pope, which was absolutely untrue. The Archbishop declared his readiness to swear on a crucifix that the Pope had accused him of such an oath. A Roman spokesman then officially denied that there had been any mention of any such oath.
Kyrie eleison.
+++
As the famous line of Virgil runs, “Whatever it may be, I do not trust the Greeks, even when they bear gifts.” This gift to Tradition can easily have been designed by Rome to persuade all kinds of Little Red Riding Hoods ... that the Big Bad Wolf is not so bad after all.
Funny how 'Greeks bearing gifts' aka Rome making seemingly traditional concessions didn't seem to bother His Excellency back in 2007 and 2009:
Many may recall in 2007 the majority of the neo-sspx members, including and explicitly the four sspx bishops, accepting with a chanted TE DEUM Benedict XVI's blasphemous Motu Proprio placing the sacrifice of the Son of God in the Official Tridentine Mass of the Catholic Church to become secondary in their eyes as the "extraordinary mass"; and the conciliar religion's novus ordo protestant supper of Baal as the "ordinary mass" being the 'superior' to the former.
The rhetoric of these sspx bishops betrayal try to soften us, saying:
[...]
Even if Bishop Williamson and others may believe that there are erroneous contradictions in the conciliar document - they still praise it any way- while it disfigures Christ and his true church even more. As like Vatican II council being erroneous, people still accept it because it has 'traditional' sounding words to in, when in fact, it is a conciliar trap to blaspheme God all the more.
So with Bishop Williamson, and the other five 'traditional' bishops chanting the TE DEUM, he continues to openly and erroneously believe that the conciliar church is the catholic church.
In 2009, it happened again!
The majority of the neo-sspx members, including and explicitly the four sspx bishops, accepting with a chanted TE DEUM Benedict XVI's blasphemous 'lifting of the excommunications". Such acceptance gives credence to the conciliarists and crucifixion to tradition.
Recall the words of Bishop Williamson who explicitly praised the pope and the world with a signed Letter his official acceptance for the false and scandalous 'lifting of the excommunications':
Take note, he also offered a 'mass' for them in thanksgiving! What a betrayal.
So where does this place him from 2007/2009 to 2016 on these issues? Did Bishop Williamson ever recant such a scandal(s)? No! He did not.
Instead, BW chose to form another lie and contradiction in narration for his new 'traditional' world to 'over look' such things, and say:
Why the double standard?
cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/williamsonexit-favoring-conciliar-structure.4156/
The rhetoric of these sspx bishops betrayal try to soften us, saying:
"well...the Pope has declared that the old Mass was never abrogated, which is a tremendous admission on Rome’s part. Also, objectively, individual priests all over the world can now pick up the old Missal and practise the true Mass, at least in private, without fear of being “disobedient,” which opens the way to a flow of true grace, as incalculable as it may also remain – private." (Bishop Williamson, Motu Proprio – III).
Even if Bishop Williamson and others may believe that there are erroneous contradictions in the conciliar document - they still praise it any way- while it disfigures Christ and his true church even more. As like Vatican II council being erroneous, people still accept it because it has 'traditional' sounding words to in, when in fact, it is a conciliar trap to blaspheme God all the more.
So with Bishop Williamson, and the other five 'traditional' bishops chanting the TE DEUM, he continues to openly and erroneously believe that the conciliar church is the catholic church.
In 2009, it happened again!
The majority of the neo-sspx members, including and explicitly the four sspx bishops, accepting with a chanted TE DEUM Benedict XVI's blasphemous 'lifting of the excommunications". Such acceptance gives credence to the conciliarists and crucifixion to tradition.
Recall the words of Bishop Williamson who explicitly praised the pope and the world with a signed Letter his official acceptance for the false and scandalous 'lifting of the excommunications':
"Please also accept, and convey to the Holy Father, my sincere personal thanks for the document signed last Wednesday and made public on Saturday. Most humbly I will offer a Mass for both of you." (Bishop Williamson, January 28, 2009) rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2009/01/apology-letter-of-bishop-richard.html
Take note, he also offered a 'mass' for them in thanksgiving! What a betrayal.
So where does this place him from 2007/2009 to 2016 on these issues? Did Bishop Williamson ever recant such a scandal(s)? No! He did not.
Instead, BW chose to form another lie and contradiction in narration for his new 'traditional' world to 'over look' such things, and say:
"Recalling how Bishop Fellay presented as two gifts of the Mother of God both in 2007 the dubious liberation of the true rite of Mass by Summorum Pontificum and in 2009 the “lifting” of the non-existent “excommunications,”" (newest Elesion comments, Brexit - Spexit?)
Why the double standard?
cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/williamsonexit-favoring-conciliar-structure.4156/
